Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review

As passive structural control systems begin to see an increased acceptance within the earthquake engineering community, strong research efforts have been shifted towards the development of semi-active structural control systems. To place semi-active control systems within a proper frame of reference, this paper begins with a qualitative description and comparison of passive, active, and semi-active control systems for protecting structures subjected to earthquake induced ground motion. A detailed literature review of semi-active control systems is then provided which provides references to both theoretical and experimental research but concentrates on describing the results of experimental work. Specifically, the review focuses on descriptions of the dynamic behavior and distinguishing features of various systems which have been experimentally tested both at the component level and within small-scale structural models. The semi-active systems which are reviewed include stiffness control devices, electrorheological dampers, magnetorheological dampers, friction control devices, fluid viscous dampers, tuned mass dampers and tuned liquid dampers. The review clearly demonstrates that semi-active control devices have the potential for improving the seismic behavior of full-scale civil structures.

[1]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Development and Experimental Study of Semi-Active Fluid Damping Devices for Seismic Protection of Structures , 1995 .

[2]  Masato Abe,et al.  SEMI-ACTIVE TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR SEISMIC PROTECTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES , 1996 .

[3]  S.J. Dyke,et al.  A comparison of semi-active control strategies for the MR damper , 1997, Proceedings Intelligent Information Systems. IIS'97.

[4]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Dynamical Model of a Magnetorheological Damper , 1996 .

[5]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  On the current status of magnetorheological dampers: seismic protection of full-scale structures , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[6]  Haluk Aktan,et al.  Experimental Implementation of Hybrid Control , 1996 .

[7]  M. C. Constantinou,et al.  Experimental Study of Seismic Response of Structures with Semi-Active Damping Control Systems , 1996 .

[8]  Robert D. Hanson,et al.  Electrorheological Dampers, Part II: Testing and Modeling , 1996 .

[9]  Y. Wen Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems , 1976 .

[10]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Control of seismically excited building structures using variable damper systems , 1996 .

[11]  M. Rabins,et al.  Semi‐Active versus Passive or Active Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Control , 1983 .

[12]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODEL FOR MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS , 1997 .

[13]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Experimental study of seismic response of buildings with supplemental fluid dampers , 1993 .

[14]  B. F. Spencer,et al.  Active Structural Control: Theory and Practice , 1992 .

[15]  A. Ebrahimpour,et al.  SemiActive Structural Control: A Low Cost Fix for An Infrastructure at Risk , 1994 .

[16]  Zexiang Li,et al.  Control of seismic-excited buildings using active variable stiffness systems , 1996 .

[17]  Haluk Aktan,et al.  Actively regulated friction slip braces , 1991 .

[18]  T. T. Soong,et al.  An Overview of Active Structural Control under Seismic Loads , 1991 .

[19]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Earthquake-Resistant Design with Rubber , 1993 .

[20]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Acceleration Feedback Control of MDOF Structures , 1996 .

[21]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Nonparametric Models for Characterization and Response Control of a Controllable Fluid Damper , 1997 .

[22]  Kazuhiko Kawashima,et al.  Hybrid control of seismic‐excited bridge structures , 1995 .

[23]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Large-Scale ER-Damper for Seismic Protection of Bridges , 1997 .

[24]  David C. Nemir,et al.  Semiactive Motion Control Using Variable Stiffness , 1994 .

[25]  Dean Karnopp,et al.  Design Principles for Vibration Control Systems Using Semi-Active Dampers , 1990 .

[26]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Friction‐Controllable Sliding Isolation System , 1993 .

[27]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Role of Control-Structure Interaction in Protective System Design , 1995 .

[28]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Structural Control with Electrorheological Dampers: Viscoplastic Behavior and Anticipation , 1996 .

[29]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  An Experimental Study of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Hazard Mitigation , 1997 .

[30]  Robert D. Hanson,et al.  Characterization of an ER Active Member , 1994 .

[31]  Irving H. Shames Elastic and inelastic stress analysis , 1991 .

[32]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Full‐Scale Implementation of Active Control. I: Design and Simulation , 1991 .

[33]  Dean Karnopp,et al.  Vibration Control Using Semi-Active Force Generators , 1974 .

[34]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction , 1996 .

[35]  Maria Qing Feng APPLICATION OF HYBRID SLIDING ISOLATION SYSTEM TO BUILDINGS , 1993 .

[36]  Robert D. Hanson,et al.  Electrorheological Dampers, Part I: Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[37]  Sami F. Masri,et al.  Modeling the oscillatory dynamic behaviour of electrorheological materials in shear , 1992 .

[38]  Michael D. Symans,et al.  Experimental Testing and Analtical Modeling of Semi-Active Fluid Dampers for Seismic Protection , 1997 .

[39]  M. C. Constantinou,et al.  Semi-active fluid damping control systems for seismic hazard mitigation , 1997 .

[40]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Seismic testing of a building structure with a semi-active fluid damper control system , 1997 .

[41]  Kazuhiko Yamada,et al.  Evaluation of an active variable-damping structure , 1994 .

[42]  P. Antsaklis,et al.  Modeling the Response of ER Damper: Phenomenology and Emulation , 1996 .

[43]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Analysis and Design of ER Damper for Seismic Protection of Structures , 1996 .

[44]  Satish Nagarajaiah Semi-Active Control of Structures , 1997 .

[45]  Takuji Kobori,et al.  Seismic response controlled structure with Active Variable Stiffness system , 1993 .

[46]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Seismic response of structures with supplemental damping , 1993 .

[47]  Kazuhiko Yamada,et al.  Control algorithm for estimating future responses of active variable stiffness structure , 1995 .

[48]  Jiahao Lin,et al.  An Introduction to Seismic Isolation , 1993 .

[49]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Structural Control: Basic Concepts and Applications , 1996 .

[50]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  Experimental and Analytical Study of a Hybrid Isolation System Using Friction Controllable Sliding Bearings , 1992 .

[51]  Zhong Liang,et al.  Real-Time Structural Parameter Modification (RSPM): Development of Innervated Structures , 1995 .

[52]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Passive and Active Structural Vibration Control in Civil Engineering , 1994, CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences.

[53]  Nicos Makris,et al.  RIGIDITY–PLASTICITY–VISCOSITY: CAN ELECTRORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS PROTECT BASE‐ISOLATED STRUCTURES FROM NEAR‐SOURCE GROUND MOTIONS? , 1997 .

[54]  Nicos Makris,et al.  An Electrorheological Damper with Annular Duct , 1996 .

[55]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Electrorheological fluid damper for seismic protection of structures , 1995, Smart Structures.

[56]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Passive Energy Dissipation Systems for Structural Design and Retrofit , 1998 .