Sharing and Riding: How the Dockless Bike Sharing Scheme in China Shapes the City

Over the last three years, the dockless bike sharing scheme has become prevalent in the context of the boom in the sharing economy, the wide use of mobile online payment, the increasing environmental awareness and the inherent market demand. This research takes Beijing as a case study, investigates the users’ characteristics, their behaviour change, and perceptions of dockless bike sharing scheme by the quantitative survey, and then analyzes the reasons behind it and how it has changed the residents’ life in Beijing. This new kind of dockless shared bikes, with great advantages of accessibility, flexibility, efficiency and affordability, helps to solve the ‘last mile’ problem, reduce the travel time, and seems to be very environmentally-friendly and sustainable. However, with the help of interview and document analysis, this research finds that the shared bikes are not the effective alternative for the frequent car-users. Nevertheless, it also has numerous negative consequences such as ‘zombie’ bikes blocking the sidewalks and vandalism to the bikes. The public is also worried about their quality and safety, especially the issues of ‘right of way’. How to coordinate and solve these problems is not only related to the future direction of the dockless bike sharing scheme but also to the vital interests of the general public. Therefore, it is important to emphasize that governments, enterprises, and the public participate in multi-party cooperation and build synergic governance networks to carry forward the advantages and avoid the negative effects of the new bike sharing system.

[1]  Feng Zhijun,et al.  Putting a circular economy into practice in China , 2007 .

[2]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Sustainable bike-sharing systems: characteristics and commonalities across cases in urban China , 2015 .

[3]  Shengxiao Li,et al.  Bicycle-metro integration in a growing city: The determinants of cycling as a transfer mode in metro station areas in Beijing , 2017 .

[4]  Michael Cahill,et al.  Transport, Environment and Society , 2010 .

[5]  Yi Ruan,et al.  Government׳s role in disruptive innovation and industry emergence: The case of the electric bike in China , 2014 .

[6]  Yu-Jun Zheng,et al.  The impact of a public bicycle-sharing system on urban public transport networks , 2018 .

[7]  Simon Washington,et al.  Bike Share: A Synthesis of the Literature , 2013 .

[8]  Longbo Huang,et al.  Rebalancing Dockless Bike Sharing Systems , 2018, ArXiv.

[9]  Maarten Kroesen,et al.  Promoting Cycling for Transport: Research Needs and Challenges , 2014 .

[10]  Wen-I Lin,et al.  Are you being shared? Mobility, data and social relations in Shanghai’s Public Bike Sharing 2.0 sector , 2018 .

[11]  Elliot K. Fishman,et al.  Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature , 2016 .

[12]  Andy S. Choi,et al.  Transport transitions in Copenhagen: Comparing the cost of cars and bicycles , 2015 .

[13]  Shan Chang,et al.  Innovative Bike-Sharing in China: Solving Faulty Bike-Sharing Recycling Problem , 2018, Journal of Advanced Transportation.

[14]  Wen Cheng,et al.  Solving the Last Mile Problem: Ensure the Success of Public Bicycle System in Beijing , 2012 .

[15]  Yongping Zhang,et al.  Environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big data-based analysis , 2018, Applied Energy.

[16]  Yun Gao China's response to climate change issues after Paris Climate Change Conference , 2016 .

[17]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Bicycle Evolution in China: From the 1900s to the Present , 2014 .

[18]  Finbarr Brereton,et al.  The economic contribution of public bike-share to the sustainability and efficient functioning of cities , 2017 .