Imaging Surrogates of Tumor Response to Therapy: Anatomic and Functional Biomarkers*

This article addresses the current status of quantitative imaging as a surrogate biomarker for the assessment of tumor response to therapy with non–small cell lung cancer as an example. In addition, the article discusses the limitations of conventional response criteria in the new era of molecular-targeted agents for cancer treatment; the increasing need for more accurate and early response-assessment methods, particularly for volumetric CT; new tumor-specific radiotracers and molecular imaging technologies; and the future applications of molecular imaging with PET for studying various features of cancer metabolism, endocrine status, hypoxia, and oncofetal and differentiation antigens.

[1]  R. D. Hunter,et al.  WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment , 1980 .

[2]  S. Larson,et al.  Patient-specific dosimetry for 131I thyroid cancer therapy using 124I PET and 3-dimensional-internal dosimetry (3D-ID) software. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  David A Mankoff,et al.  PET imaging of cellular proliferation. , 2005, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[4]  D. Haber,et al.  Molecular predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  Gig Mageras,et al.  Reproducibility of intratumor distribution of (18)F-fluoromisonidazole in head and neck cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  I. Tannock,et al.  Influence of measurement error on assessment of response to anticancer chemotherapy: proposal for new criteria of tumor response. , 1984, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  David L. Schwartz,et al.  Tumor Hypoxia Imaging with [F-18] Fluoromisonidazole Positron Emission Tomography in Head and Neck Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[9]  Falko Fend,et al.  Early Response Assessment Using 3′-Deoxy-3′-[18F]Fluorothymidine-Positron Emission Tomography in High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  John L. Humm,et al.  Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis. , 1999, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[11]  R L Wahl,et al.  Does FDG uptake measure proliferative activity of human cancer cells? In vitro comparison with DNA flow cytometry and tritiated thymidine uptake. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  William Pao,et al.  Prospective Assessment of Discontinuation and Reinitiation of Erlotinib or Gefitinib in Patients with Acquired Resistance to Erlotinib or Gefitinib Followed by the Addition of Everolimus , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  David W Townsend,et al.  Time Course of Early Response to Chemotherapy in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  J. Hanley,et al.  The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer , 1976, Cancer.

[15]  Michael E Phelps,et al.  Evaluation of thoracic tumors with 18F-fluorothymidine and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. , 2006, Chest.

[16]  Danny Rischin,et al.  Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  H. Tonami,et al.  Fluorine-18-FDG PET imaging is negative in bronchioloalveolar lung carcinoma. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  W. Oyen,et al.  Prognostic Value of Different Metabolic Measurements with Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Two-Center Study , 2007, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[19]  A. Shields,et al.  PET imaging with 18F-FLT and thymidine analogs: promise and pitfalls. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  R. Blasberg,et al.  and Other Imaging Probes , 2008 .

[21]  R. Deberardinis,et al.  The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. , 2008, Cell metabolism.

[22]  P. Cutler,et al.  Preclinical evaluation of fluorine-18-labeled androgen receptor ligands in baboons. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  PET Imaging with 18 F-FLT and Thymidine Analogs: Promise and Pitfalls , 2003 .

[24]  H. Minn,et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose imaging: a method to assess the proliferative activity of human cancer in vivo. Comparison with DNA flow cytometry in head and neck tumors. , 1988, Cancer.

[25]  R L Wahl,et al.  Lung cancer: reproducibility of quantitative measurements for evaluating 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake at PET. , 1995, Radiology.

[26]  Neal Rosen,et al.  Imaging the pharmacodynamics of HER2 degradation in response to Hsp90 inhibitors , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Evaluating variability in tumor measurements from same-day repeat CT scans of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. , 2009, Radiology.

[28]  M Mazumdar,et al.  Measuring tumor response and shape change on CT: esophageal cancer as a paradigm. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[29]  Richard Laforest,et al.  Assessing Tumor Hypoxia in Cervical Cancer by PET with 60Cu-Labeled Diacetyl-Bis(N4-Methylthiosemicarbazone) , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  M. Goodman,et al.  Improved synthesis of anti-[18F]FACBC: improved preparation of labeling precursor and automated radiosynthesis. , 2003, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[31]  Haesun Choi,et al.  Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  S M Larson,et al.  Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding , 1997, Cancer.

[33]  Otto Muzik,et al.  Imaging proliferation in vivo with [F-18]FLT and positron emission tomography , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[34]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  Monitoring cancer treatment with PET/CT: does it make a difference? , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[35]  M. Welch,et al.  16β-((18F)Fluoro)estrogens: Systematic Investigation of a New Series of Fluorine-18-Labeled Estrogens as Potential Imaging Agents for Estrogen-Receptor-Positive Breast Tumors. , 1993 .

[36]  Ralph J Deberardinis,et al.  Brick by brick: metabolism and tumor cell growth. , 2008, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[37]  Kathryn Trinkaus,et al.  PET-based estradiol challenge as a predictive biomarker of response to endocrine therapy in women with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[38]  U. G. Dailey Cancer,Facts and Figures about. , 2022, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[39]  M. Palmer,et al.  WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment , 1982, British Journal of Cancer.

[40]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Monitoring response to therapy in cancer using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose and positron emission tomography: an overview of different analytical methods , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  J R Griffiths,et al.  Clinical studies. , 2005, Advances in pharmacology.

[42]  Heikki Joensuu,et al.  Florodeoxyglucose imaging: A method to assess the proliferative activity of human cancer in vivo. Comparison with DNA flow cytometry in head and neck tumors , 1988 .

[43]  H. Groen,et al.  Is 18F-3'-fluoro-3'-deoxy-L-thymidine useful for the staging and restaging of non-small cell lung cancer? , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[44]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Monitoring Tumor Glucose Utilization by Positron Emission Tomography for the Prediction of Treatment Response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase Inhibitors , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[45]  C. Dooms,et al.  Positron-emission tomography in prognostic and therapeutic assessment of lung cancer: systematic review. , 2004, The Lancet. Oncology.

[46]  Haesun Choi Critical issues in response evaluation on computed tomography: Lessons from the gastrointestinal stromal tumor model , 2005, Current oncology reports.

[47]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Lung cancer: computerized quantification of tumor response--initial results. , 2006, Radiology.

[48]  A. Wolf,et al.  A shielded synthesis system for production of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose. , 1981, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[49]  A. Miller,et al.  Reporting results of cancer treatment , 1981, Cancer.

[50]  L. H. Gray,et al.  The Histological Structure of Some Human Lung Cancers and the Possible Implications for Radiotherapy , 1955, British Journal of Cancer.

[51]  W. Oyen,et al.  Chemotherapy Response Evaluation with 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[52]  Guoying Liu,et al.  Expanding the use of magnetic resonance in the assessment of tumor response to therapy: workshop report. , 2005, Cancer research.

[53]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[54]  Chronic Disease Division Cancer facts and figures , 2010 .

[55]  R. Blasberg,et al.  Imaging of HSV-tk Reporter Gene Expression: Comparison Between [18F]FEAU, [18F]FFEAU, and Other Imaging Probes , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[56]  O. Warburg [Origin of cancer cells]. , 1956, Oncologia.

[57]  Y. Erdi,et al.  PET-based radiation dosimetry in man of 18F-fluorodihydrotestosterone, a new radiotracer for imaging prostate cancer. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[58]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial End Points: “RECIST”ing a Step Backwards , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[59]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[60]  L M Hamberg,et al.  The dose uptake ratio as an index of glucose metabolism: useful parameter or oversimplification? , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[61]  S. Larson,et al.  Imaging transgene expression with radionuclide imaging technologies. , 2000, Neoplasia.

[62]  Joel Karp,et al.  Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[63]  A. Shields,et al.  Radiosynthesis of 3'-deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine: [(18)F]FLT for imaging of cellular proliferation in vivo. , 2000, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[64]  Lawrence H Schwartz,et al.  18F-FDG PET as a candidate for "qualified biomarker": functional assessment of treatment response in oncology. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[65]  J. Humm,et al.  Preoperative characterisation of clear-cell renal carcinoma using iodine-124-labelled antibody chimeric G250 (124I-cG250) and PET in patients with renal masses: a phase I trial. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[66]  B. Långström,et al.  The preparation of 11C-methyl iodide and its use in the synthesis of 11C-methyl-L-methionine. , 1976, The International journal of applied radiation and isotopes.

[67]  S. Larson,et al.  Early tumor response to Hsp90 therapy using HER2 PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[68]  J. Bigby Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine , 1988 .

[69]  J Nucl Med , 2010 .

[70]  M. Christian,et al.  [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. , 2000, Bulletin du cancer.

[71]  K. Krohn,et al.  Characterization of radiolabeled fluoromisonidazole as a probe for hypoxic cells. , 1987, Radiation research.

[72]  S. Larson,et al.  3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography is a sensitive method for imaging the response of BRAF-dependent tumors to MEK inhibition. , 2007, Cancer research.

[73]  Mark Muzi,et al.  Kinetic analysis of 3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine PET studies: validation studies in patients with lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[74]  K. Herholz,et al.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[75]  Y. Erdi,et al.  Tumor Localization of 16β-18F-Fluoro-5α-Dihydrotestosterone Versus 18F-FDG in Patients with Progressive, Metastatic Prostate Cancer , 2004 .

[76]  E. Yorke,et al.  SU‐FF‐J‐83: Inaccuracy of Fixed Threshold Segmentation for PET , 2006 .

[77]  J. Humm,et al.  Imaging herpes virus thymidine kinase gene transfer and expression by positron emission tomography. , 1998, Cancer research.

[78]  Mark Muzi,et al.  In vivo validation of 3'deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine ([(18)F]FLT) as a proliferation imaging tracer in humans: correlation of [(18)F]FLT uptake by positron emission tomography with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry in human lung tumors. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[79]  R. Vallance,et al.  Neoplasms of the lung. , 1978, British medical journal.

[80]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[81]  P. Vaupel,et al.  Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome , 2007, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[82]  C. Dence,et al.  Positron tomographic assessment of androgen receptors in prostatic carcinoma , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[83]  K. Herholz,et al.  FDG transport and phosphorylation in human gliomas measured with dynamic PET , 1992, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.