Diversity partitioning without statistical independence of alpha and beta.

Diversity partitioning has become a popular method for analyzing patterns of alpha and beta diversity. A recent evaluation of the method emphasized a distinction between additive and multiplicative partitioning and further advocated the use of multiplicative partitioning based on a presumed independence between alpha and beta. Concurrently, additive partitioning was criticized for producing dependent alpha and beta estimates. Until now, the issue of statistical independence of alpha and beta (in either type of partitioning) has not been thoroughly examined, partly due to confusion about the meaning of statistical independence. Here, we adopted a probability-based definition of statistical independence that is essentially identical to the definition found in any statistics textbook. We used a data simulation approach to show that alpha and beta diversity are not statistically independent in either additive or multiplicative partitioning. However, the extent of the dependence is not so great that it cannot be overcome by using appropriate statistical techniques to control it. Both additive and multiplicative partitioning are statistically valid and logically sound approaches to analyzing diversity patterns.

[1]  P. Edwards,et al.  Quantifying habitat specificity to assess the contribution of a patch to species richness at a landscape scale , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  C. Ricotta Computing additive beta-diversity from presence and absence scores: a critique and alternative parameters. , 2008, Theoretical population biology.

[3]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[4]  A. Shmida,et al.  Measuring beta diversity with presence-absence data , 1984 .

[5]  L. Jost Entropy and diversity , 2006 .

[6]  C. Ricotta On hierarchical diversity decomposition , 2005 .

[7]  T. O. Crist,et al.  Additive partitioning of rarefaction curves and species-area relationships: unifying alpha-, beta- and gamma-diversity with sample size and habitat area. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[8]  Gabriela Hofer,et al.  Effects of topographic variability on the scaling of plant species richness in gradient dominated landscapes , 2008 .

[9]  T. O. Crist,et al.  The alpha–beta–regional relationship: providing new insights into local–regional patterns of species richness and scale dependence of diversity components , 2002 .

[10]  H. Tijms Understanding Probability: Chance Rules in Everyday Life , 2004 .

[11]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  Chance in Biology: Using Probability to Explore Nature , 2000 .

[12]  L. Jost Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. , 2007, Ecology.

[13]  C. Ricotta On beta diversity decomposition: trouble shared is not trouble halved. , 2010, Ecology.