[Considerations for normalisation of RT-qPCR in oncology].

Gene expression analysis has many applications in the management of cancer, including diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic care. In this context, the reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) has become the "gold standard" for mRNA quantification. However, this technique involves several critical steps such as RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, quantitative PCR, and analysis, which all can be source of variation. To obtain biologically meaningful results, data normalisation is required to correct sample-to-sample variations that may be introduced during this multistage process. Normalisation can be carried out against a housekeeping gene, total RNA mass, or cell number. Careful choice of the normalization method is crucial, as any variation in the reference will introduce errors in the quantification of mRNA transcripts. By reviewing the different methods available and their related problems, the aim of this article is to provide recommendations for the set up of an appropriate normalisation strategy for RT-qPCR data in oncology.

[1]  Atsushi Ono,et al.  "Per cell" normalization method for mRNA measurement by quantitative PCR and microarrays , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[2]  Thomas Ragg,et al.  The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements , 2006, BMC Molecular Biology.

[3]  S A Bustin,et al.  Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. , 2002, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[4]  Tania Nolan,et al.  Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. , 2004, Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT.

[5]  Martin R. Johnson,et al.  Housekeeping gene variability in normal and carcinomatous colorectal and liver tissues: applications in pharmacogenomic gene expression studies. , 2002, Analytical biochemistry.

[6]  O. Berthier‐Vergnes,et al.  Ribosomal 18S RNA prevails over glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and beta-actin genes as internal standard for quantitative comparison of mRNA levels in invasive and noninvasive human melanoma cell subpopulations. , 2001, Analytical biochemistry.

[7]  M. Solanas,et al.  Unsuitability of using ribosomal RNA as loading control for Northern blot analyses related to the imbalance between messenger and ribosomal RNA content in rat mammary tumors. , 2001, Analytical biochemistry.

[8]  F. Berthold,et al.  Reliable transcript quantification by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in primary neuroblastoma using normalization to averaged expression levels of the control genes HPRT1 and SDHA. , 2005, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[9]  Claus Lindbjerg Andersen,et al.  Normalization of Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR Data: A Model-Based Variance Estimation Approach to Identify Genes Suited for Normalization, Applied to Bladder and Colon Cancer Data Sets , 2004, Cancer Research.

[10]  F. Speleman,et al.  Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes , 2002, Genome Biology.

[11]  N S Williams,et al.  Detection of cytokeratins 19/20 and guanylyl cyclase C in peripheral blood of colorectal cancer patients , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  R. Grobholz,et al.  Standardization strategy for quantitative PCR in human seminoma and normal testis. , 2005, Journal of biotechnology.

[13]  S A Bustin,et al.  Quantitative real-time RT-PCR--a perspective. , 2005, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[14]  J. Beaulieu,et al.  Normalizing genes for quantitative RT-PCR in differentiating human intestinal epithelial cells and adenocarcinomas of the colon. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[15]  M. Pfaffl,et al.  Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper – Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations , 2004, Biotechnology Letters.

[16]  S. Bustin.  Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. , 2000, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[17]  I. Lossos,et al.  Optimization of quantitative real-time RT-PCR parameters for the study of lymphoid malignancies , 2003, Leukemia.

[18]  Russell G Foster,et al.  Experimental validation of novel and conventional approaches to quantitative real-time PCR data analysis. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  Tania Nolan,et al.  SPUD: a quantitative PCR assay for the detection of inhibitors in nucleic acid preparations. , 2006, Analytical biochemistry.

[20]  L. Andrejka,et al.  Mitochondrial ATP Synthase 6 as an Endogenous Control in the Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Clinical Cancer Samples , 2000, Molecular Diagnosis.

[21]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[22]  S. Walker,et al.  Quantitative RT-PCR : Pitfalls and Potential , 1999 .

[23]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Effect of experimental treatment on housekeeping gene expression: validation by real-time, quantitative RT-PCR. , 2000, Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods.

[24]  R. Barber,et al.  GAPDH as a housekeeping gene: analysis of GAPDH mRNA expression in a panel of 72 human tissues. , 2005, Physiological genomics.

[25]  Weihong Liu,et al.  A new quantitative method of real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay based on simulation of polymerase chain reaction kinetics. , 2002, Analytical biochemistry.

[26]  M. Rajeevan,et al.  DNA and RNA references for qRT-PCR assays in exfoliated cervical cells. , 2006, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[27]  J. Goepel,et al.  Investigation of the expression of housekeeping genes in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1993, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[28]  Mario Pazzagli,et al.  Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction: normalization to rRNA or single housekeeping genes is inappropriate for human tissue biopsies. , 2002, Analytical biochemistry.

[29]  S. Bustin,et al.  Quantification strategies in real-time PCR , 2008 .

[30]  W. Siegert,et al.  Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[31]  K. Kreuzer,et al.  Quantitative analysis of beta-actin, beta-2-microglobulin and porphobilinogen deaminase mRNA and their comparison as control transcripts for RT-PCR. , 2002, Molecular and cellular probes.

[32]  J. Aerts,et al.  Selection of appropriate control genes to assess expression of tumor antigens using real-time RT-PCR. , 2004, BioTechniques.

[33]  L. Marco,et al.  Selection of suitable reference genes for accurate normalization of gene expression profile studies in non-small cell lung cancer , 2006, BMC Cancer.

[34]  Ton Feuth,et al.  Normalization of gene expression measurements in tumor tissues: comparison of 13 endogenous control genes , 2005, Laboratory Investigation.

[35]  S. Lightfoot,et al.  Quantitation comparison of total RNA using the Agilent , 2002 .

[36]  B. Tilton,et al.  Housekeeping gene variability in normal and cancerous colorectal, pancreatic, esophageal, gastric and hepatic tissues. , 2005, Molecular and cellular probes.

[37]  M. Sirover.  New nuclear functions of the glycolytic protein, glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase, in mammalian cells , 2005, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[38]  Charles Auffray,et al.  Towards standardization of RNA quality assessment using user-independent classifiers of microcapillary electrophoresis traces , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  D. W. Liu,et al.  Choice of endogenous control for gene expression in nonsmall cell lung cancer , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.

[40]  M. Pfaffl,et al.  A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  Andreas Nitsche,et al.  Gene expression studies in prostate cancer tissue: which reference gene should be selected for normalization? , 2005, Journal of Molecular Medicine.