Population Growth, Urban Expansion, and Private Forestry in Western Oregon

Private forestlands in the United States face increasing pressures from growing populations, resulting in greater numbers of people living in closer proximity to forests. What often is called the "wildland/urban interface" is characterized by expansion of residential and other developed land uses onto forested landscapes in a manner that threatens forestlands as productive socioeconomic and ecological resources. Prevailing hypotheses suggest that such forestlands can become less productive, because forest owners reduce investments in forest management. We develop empirical models describing forest stocking, thinning, harvest, and tree planting in western Oregon, as functions of stand and site characteristics, ownership, and building densities. We use the models to examine the potential impacts of population growth and urban expansion, as described by increasing building densities, on the likelihood that forest owners maintain forest stocking, precommercial thin, harvest, and plant trees following harvest. Empirical results support the general conclusion that population growth and urban expansion are correlated with reduced forest management and investment on private forest- lands in western Oregon (USA). Results have potential implications for both economic outputs and ecological conditions, as well as for wildfire risks at the wildland/urban interface. FOR. SCI. 50(1):33-43.

[1]  N. Sampson,et al.  Forest fragmentation: implications for sustainable private forests. , 2000 .

[2]  Raymond M. Sheffield,et al.  The effects of population growth on timber management and inventories in Virginia , 1999 .

[3]  D. Azuma,et al.  Timber resource statistics for eastern Oregon, 1999. , 2004 .

[4]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[5]  D. Dennis A probit analysis of the harvest decision using pooled time-series and cross-sectional data , 1990 .

[6]  D. M. Holthausen,et al.  The behavior of nonindustrial private forest landowners , 1989 .

[7]  David L. Evans,et al.  The Effect of Urban Sprawl on Timber Harvesting: A Look at Two Southern States , 1998 .

[8]  Sayeed R. Mehmood,et al.  Forest Parcelization in the United States: A Study of Contributing Factors , 2001, Journal of Forestry.

[9]  David N. Wear,et al.  Production Economics of Private Forestry: A Comparison of Industrial and Nonindustrial Forest Owners , 1993 .

[10]  Jeffrey D. Kline,et al.  Modeling the spatially dynamic distribution of humans in the Oregon (USA) Coast Range , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  J. Kline,et al.  Forest owner incentives to protect riparian habitat , 2000 .

[12]  David L. Evans,et al.  Urbanization's impact on timber harvesting in the south central United States. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  M. Andrews,et al.  The Effects of Suburbanization on Agriculture , 1988 .

[14]  A. E. Luloff,et al.  The Exurbanization of America's Forests: Research in Rural Social Science , 2000, Journal of Forestry.

[15]  Rebecca L. Johnson,et al.  Fostering the Production of Nontimber Services Among Forest Owners with Heterogeneous Objectives , 2000, Forest Science.

[16]  J. Kuuluvainen,et al.  Landowner Objectives and Nonindustrial Private Timber Supply , 1996, Forest Science.

[17]  Dale e. Lehman,et al.  A behavioral model of timber supply , 1988 .

[18]  W. McGinnis,et al.  County portraits of Oregon and Northern California. , 1996 .

[19]  D. Dennis An economic analysis of harvest behavior: integrating forest and ownership characteristics , 1989 .