Tests of age-independent competition indices for individual trees in natural hardwood stands

Lorimer, C.G., 1983. Tests of age-independent competition indices for individual trees in natural hardwood stands. For. Ecol. Manage., 6: 343--360. Recent studies have demonstrated that simple indices of competition that incorporate competitor size and inter-tree distances generally perform as well in predicting individual tree growth as more complex approaches of assessing spatial pattern. A major limitation of diameter-distance indices, however, is that their numerical values decrease in a given stand over time even when the stocking level remains constant. In this paper two modifications are proposed which make the index essentially independent of age, thus necessitating only one competition-grow th regression for each species on a given site and allowing comparisons between different stands. Tests of" several index designs in three evenaged temperate hardwood stands indicated that the correlation between competition and growth is optimal over a wide range of competition radii and that the inclusion of intertree distances is of little value despite considerable small-scale variability in the stocking level around individual trees. Highest correlations were obtained when competitors were defined to be only those trees of equal or higher crown class than the subject tree. In these hardwood stands a comparison of the size of a subject tree to that of the competitors was necessary for reasonable correlations with growth. These correlations varied greatly among species even within a single stand and appear to be related to the shade tolerance of the species. For general use the index (F.Dy)/D l is recommended, where Dy is the diameter of competitor j and D i is the diameter of subject tree i. This index can be computed rapidly in the field and does not require mapping of stem positions.

[1]  Samuel F. Ginrich.  Measuring and Evaluating Stocking and Stand Density in Upland Hardwood Forests in the Central States , 1967 .

[2]  Carl H. Tubbs,et al.  Stocking and structure for maximum growth in sugar maple selection stands. , 1981 .

[3]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  The Use of Distance Measures in Phytosociological Sampling , 1956 .

[4]  J. Jarvis,et al.  A Preliminary Study to Assess Competition in a White Spruce - Trembling Aspen Stand , 1963 .

[5]  J. A. Moore,et al.  A New Index Representing Individual Tree Competitive Status , 1973 .

[6]  H. Clay Smith.  Height of Tallest Saplings in 10-year-old Appalachian Hardwood Clearcuts , 1977 .

[7]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Canopy-Understory Interaction and the Internal Dynamics of Mature Hardwood and Hemlock-Hardwood Forests , 1981 .

[8]  F. S. Baker.  A Revised Tolerance Table , 1949 .

[9]  J. Opie.  Predictability of Individual Tree Growth Using Various Definitions of Competing Basal Area , 1968 .

[10]  R. M. Newnham.  The development of a stand model for Douglas fir , 1964 .

[11]  I. Bella,et al.  A New Competition Model for Individual Trees , 1971 .

[12]  J. Krajícek,et al.  Crown competition-a measure of density. , 1961 .

[13]  J. Y. H. Lin.  Growing space index and stand simulation of young Western Hemlock in Oregon. , 1970 .

[14]  Richard F. Daniels,et al.  Simple Competition Indices and Their Correlation with Annual Loblolly Pine Tree Growth , 1976 .

[15]  R. Ellis.  Response of crop trees of sugar maple, white ash, and black cherry to release and fertilization , 1979 .

[16]  G. J. Hamilton,et al.  The Dependence of Volume Increment of Individual Trees on Dominance, Crown Dimensions, and Competition , 1969 .