The role of size in firms' training: evidence from Spain

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse why small firms provide less training to their employees than their larger counterparts. The hypothesis is that large firms are endowed with certain firm characteristics that require more training and with some that allow them to obtain larger returns from this investment. Design/methodology/approach - The paper analyses the individual contribution of these characteristics to explain the gap between small and large firms in the probability of providing training and its extent using the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition. Findings - Small firms face greater obstacles in accessing training and the main reasons for that are related to their technological activity and the geographic scope of the market in which they operate. Together, these variables explain about half of the training gap in both the participation and the quantity decisions. Practical implications - The limited access to training of small firms prevents them from becoming more competitive by using a tool that would permit a better adoption of new technology and access to foreign markets. Originality/value - The paper exploits the data on training expenditure and relates this investment with other firms' strategies, such as innovation or internationalization. It also suggests estimating this type of data by means of a two-part model.

[1]  Yi Liu,et al.  The relationship between HRM, technology innovation and performance in China , 2006 .

[2]  John M. Barron,et al.  Gender Differences in Training, Capital, and Wages , 1993 .

[3]  David A. Belsley,et al.  Regression Analysis and its Application: A Data-Oriented Approach.@@@Applied Linear Regression.@@@Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1981 .

[4]  A. Blinder.  Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates , 1973 .

[5]  P. O'Connell,et al.  Company training and low‐skill consumer‐service jobs in Ireland , 2004 .

[6]  T. D. Wallace,et al.  A Test of the Mean Square Error Criterion for Restrictions in Linear Regression , 1968 .

[7]  T. Korpi,et al.  Training and industrial restructuring: Structural change and labour mobility in West Germany and Sweden , 2004 .

[8]  Edward C. Norton,et al.  Choosing Between and Interpreting the Heckit and Two-Part Models for Corner Solutions , 2003, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[9]  Myeong-Su Yun.  Decomposing Differences in the First Moment , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Walter Y. Oi,et al.  HETEROGENEOUS FIRMS AND THE ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTION , 1983 .

[11]  Erik Strøjer Madsen,et al.  R&D and productivity in Danish firms: some empirical evidence , 2004 .

[12]  Corporate Tournaments, Human Capital Acquisition, and the Firm Size-Wage Relation , 2001 .

[13]  J. G. Cragg.  Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods , 1971 .

[14]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  Beyond the Incidence of Training: Evidence from a National Employers Survey , 1995 .

[15]  Ronald L. Oaxaca,et al.  On discrimination and the decomposition of wage differentials , 1994 .

[16]  Carlos Peraita.  Firm-sponsored training in regulated labour markets: evidence from Spain , 2005 .

[17]  L. Lynch.  The Economics of Youth Training in the United States , 1993 .

[18]  M. Hashimoto.  Bonus Payments, on-the-Job Training, and Lifetime Employment in Japan , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  Barbara Mueller,et al.  Why Has the Share of Training Firms Declined in Switzerland? , 2007 .

[20]  Rosina Moreno,et al.  Decomposing Differences in Total Factor Productivity Across Firm Size , 2007 .

[21]  Elena Huergo,et al.  How Does Probability of Innovation Change with Firm Age? , 2004 .

[22]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  Technology Use, Training and Plant-Specific Knowledge in Manufacturing Establishments , 1995 .

[23]  Zheng Wang,et al.  On-the-Job Training, Establishment Size, and Firm Size: Evidence for Economies of Scale in the Production of Human Capital , 1999 .

[24]  Alfonso Alba-Ramírez.  Formal Training, Temporary Contracts, Productivity and Wages in Spain , 2009 .

[25]  Shihti Yu,et al.  On the choice between sample selection and two-part models , 1996 .

[26]  E. Strobl,et al.  Do Government Subsidies Stimulate Training Expenditure? Microeconometric Evidence from Plant Level Data , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[27]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[28]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[29]  R. Blundell,et al.  Human capital investment: the returns from education and training to the individual, the firm and the economy , 2005 .

[30]  David S. Evans,et al.  Why Do Smaller Firms Pay Less , 1989 .

[31]  A. Ugidos,et al.  More on Identification in Detailed Wage Decompositions , 2002, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[32]  H. Oosterbeek.  A decomposition of training probabilities , 1996 .

[33]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  Beyond the Incidence of Employer-Provided Training , 1998 .

[34]  R. Oaxaca.  Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets , 1973 .

[35]  Carlos García‐Serrano,et al.  Firm-provided training and temporary contracts , 2005 .

[36]  A. Bartel.  Formal Employee Training Programs and Their Impact on Labor Produc- Tivity: Evidence from a Human Resources Survey , 1989 .

[37]  D. Guilkey,et al.  Estimation and testing in the random effects probit model , 1993 .

[38]  Mike Rigby.  Training in Spain: an evaluation of the continuous training agreements (1993 – 2001) with particular reference to SMEs , 2004 .

[39]  P. Osterman.  Skill, Training, and Work Organization in American Establishments , 1995 .

[40]  Salvador Barrios,et al.  Explaining Firms' Export Behaviour: R&D, Spillovers and the Destination Market , 2003 .

[41]  A. Holtmann,et al.  Employer Size and On-the-Job Training Decisions , 1991 .

[42]  Innovation, investment and productivity: evidence from Spanish firms , 2004 .