The Application of the Heuristic-Systematic Processing Model to Treatment Decision Making about Prostate Cancer

The study investigated the utility of the Heuristic-Systematic Processing Model as a framework for the investigation of patient decision making. A total of 111 men recently diagnosed with localized prostate cancer were assessed using Verbal Protocol Analysis and self-report measures. Study variables included men’s use of nonsystematic and systematic information processing, desire for involvement in decision making, and the individual differences of health locus of control, tolerance of ambiguity, and decision-related uncertainty. Most men (68%) preferred that decision making be shared equally between them and their doctor. Men’s use of the expert opinion heuristic was related to men’s verbal reports of decisional uncertainty and having a positive orientation to their doctor and medical care; a desire for greater involvement in decision making was predicted by a high internal locus of health control. Trends were observed for systematic information processing to increase when the heuristic strategy used was negatively affect laden and when men were uncertain about the probabilities for cure and side effects. There was a trend for decreased systematic processing when the expert opinion heuristic was used. Findings were consistent with the Heuristic-Systematic Processing Model and suggest that this model has utility for future research in applied decision making about health.

[1]  Stefano Occhipinti,et al.  Decision Making About Treatment of Hypothetical Prostate Cancer , 2002 .

[2]  C. Schneider,et al.  How underlying patient beliefs can affect physician-patient communication about prostate-specific antigen testing. , 2002, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[3]  T R Morgan,et al.  Information and decision-making preferences of men with prostate cancer. , 1995, Oncology nursing forum.

[4]  J. Baron,et al.  The Role of Physicians’ Recommendations in Medical Treatment Decisions , 2002, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  R. Gardiner,et al.  Making decisions about treatment for localized prostate cancer , 2002, BJU international.

[6]  A. O'Connor.  Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[7]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Propositional reasoning by model. , 1992, Psychological review.

[8]  D Kahneman,et al.  On the reality of cognitive illusions. , 1996, Psychological review.

[9]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications , 1995 .

[10]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[11]  B. Germino,et al.  Prostate cancer treatment decisions: a focus group exploration. , 1998, Oncology nursing forum.

[12]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Selective Use of Heunrstic and Systematic Processing Under Defense Motivation , 1997 .

[13]  H. Llewellyn-Thomas,et al.  Cancer Patients' Decision Making and Trial-entry Preferences , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[14]  Mazur Dj,et al.  Patient preferences for management of localized prostate cancer. , 1996 .

[15]  R. Scott Tindale,et al.  Heuristics and Biases in Applied Settings , 1994 .

[16]  R. Gardiner,et al.  Prospective study of men's psychological and decision-related adjustment after treatment for localized prostate cancer. , 2004, Urology.

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Disjunction Effect in Choice under Uncertainty , 1992 .

[18]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information , 1995 .

[19]  S. Shiloh.  Heuristics and Biases in Health Decision Making , 1994 .

[20]  C. Iselin,et al.  Treatment options, selection, and satisfaction among african american and white men with prostate carcinoma in north carolina , 1998, Cancer.

[21]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  S. Whitney.  A New Model of Medical Decisions: Exploring the Limits of Shared Decision Making , 2003, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[23]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Behavioral Law and Economics: Reluctance to Vaccinate: Omission Bias and Ambiguity , 1990 .

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  O'Rourke Me,et al.  PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENT DECISIONS : A FOCUS GROUP EXPLORATION , 1998 .

[26]  L. Degner,et al.  Empowerment of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. , 1997, Cancer nursing.

[27]  G. Davison,et al.  Think-aloud approaches to cognitive assessment and the articulated thoughts in simulated situations paradigm. , 1997, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[28]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[29]  Jr. A. P. Mac Donald,et al.  Revised Scale for Ambiguity Tolerance: Reliability and Validity , 1970 .

[30]  Lesley Fallowfield,et al.  No news is not good news: Information preferences of patients with cancer , 1995, Psycho-oncology.

[31]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[32]  Kenneth A. Wallston,et al.  Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales , 1978, Health education monographs.

[33]  G. Gigerenzer.  On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: A Reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996) , 1996 .

[34]  W. Hippel,et al.  Mapping cognitive structures and processes through verbal content: the thought-listing technique. , 1997, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[35]  D A Redelmeier,et al.  Understanding patients' decisions. Cognitive and emotional perspectives. , 1993, JAMA.

[36]  R. Dales,et al.  Framing effects on expectations, decisions, and side effects experienced: the case of influenza immunization. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[37]  Peter Tugwell,et al.  Randomized Trial of a Portable, Self-administered Decision Aid for Postmenopausal Women Considering Long-term Preventive Hormone Therapy , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[38]  R. Ranyard,et al.  A conversation-based process tracing method for use with naturalistic decisions: an evaluation study. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[39]  D. Hickam,et al.  Patient preferences for management of localized prostate cancer. , 1996, The Western journal of medicine.

[40]  M. O'rourke,et al.  Narrowing the options: the process of deciding on prostate cancer treatment. , 1999, Cancer investigation.

[41]  L. Degner,et al.  Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[42]  P Tugwell,et al.  A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. , 1998, Patient education and counseling.

[43]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Thinking too Much or too Little? The Effects of Introspection on the Decision-Making Process , 1999 .

[44]  S. Thompson,et al.  Preferences for involvement in medical decision-making: situational and demographic influences. , 1993, Patient education and counseling.

[45]  S. Ratneshwar,et al.  The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion , 1997 .

[46]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[48]  D H Hickam,et al.  How Patients' Preferences for Risk Information Influence Treatment Choice in a Case of High Risk and High Therapeutic Uncertainty , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.