Scientists' data reuse behaviors: A multilevel analysis

This study explores the factors that influence the data reuse behaviors of scientists and identifies the generalized patterns that occur in data reuse across various disciplines. This research employed an integrated theoretical framework combining institutional theory and the theory of planned behavior. The combined theoretical framework can apply the institutional theory at the individual level and extend the theory of planned behavior by including relevant contexts. This study utilized a survey method to test the proposed research model and hypotheses. Study participants were recruited from the Community of Science's (CoS) Scholar Database, and a total of 1,528 scientists responded to the survey. A multilevel analysis method was used to analyze the 1,237 qualified responses. This research showed that scientists' data reuse intentions are influenced by both disciplinary level factors (availability of data repositories) and individual level factors (perceived usefulness, perceived concern, and the availability of internal resources). This study has practical implications for promoting data reuse practices. Three main areas that need to be improved are identified: Educating scientists, providing internal supports, and providing external resources and supports such as data repositories.

[1]  Lei Wu,et al.  Managing scientific data as public assets: Data sharing practices and policies among full‐time government employees , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Melissa H. Cragin,et al.  Scientific Data Collections and Distributed Collective Practice , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[3]  S. Fransen,et al.  An empirical inquiry , 2018 .

[4]  Ming-Chi Lee,et al.  Predicting and explaining the adoption of online trading: An empirical study in Taiwan , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  Feng-Yang Kuo,et al.  Predicting knowledge sharing practices through intention: A test of competing models , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Nancy A. Van House,et al.  Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: sharing environmental planning data sets , 1998, CSCW '98.

[7]  Mary Shaw,et al.  Games Programs Play: Obstacles to Data Reuse , 2006 .

[8]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Managing fixity and fluidity in data repositories , 2012, iConference '12.

[9]  M. Daniels.  Data Reuse in Museum Contexts: Experiences of Archaeologists and Botanists. , 2014 .

[10]  Cameron Lawrence,et al.  Institutions and Organizations (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[11]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Social scientists' satisfaction with data reuse , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Cary P Gross,et al.  The importance of clinical trial data sharing: toward more open science. , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[13]  Pamela S. Tolbert.  Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Sources of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education. , 1985 .

[14]  T. Ramayah,et al.  An Empirical Inquiry on Knowledge Sharing Among Academicians in Higher Learning Institutions , 2013 .

[15]  Abigail Goben,et al.  Do You Have an Institutional Data Policy? A Review of the Current Landscape of Library Data Services and Institutional Data Policies , 2015 .

[16]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Beyond trust and reliability: reusing data in collaborative cancer epidemiology research , 2013, CSCW.

[17]  K. Klein,et al.  Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis , 1994 .

[18]  Ann Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond the Data Deluge: A Research Agenda for Large-Scale Data Sharing and Reuse , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[19]  M FanielIxchel,et al.  Reusing Scientific Data , 2010 .

[20]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Data reuse and sensemaking among novice social scientists , 2012, ASIST.

[21]  Ayoung Yoon.  End users’ trust in data repositories: definition and influences on trust development , 2014 .

[22]  Besiki Stvilia,et al.  Prioritization of data quality dimensions and skills requirements in genome annotation work , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  P. A. Martin.  More replication studies needed. , 1995, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[25]  Marc Berg,et al.  The contextual nature of medical information , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[26]  D. Littler,et al.  Consumer perceptions of risk and uncertainty and the implications for behaviour towards innovative retail services: The case of Internet Banking , 2006 .

[27]  Zahra Tohidinia,et al.  Knowledge sharing behaviour and its predictors , 2010, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[28]  Suzie Allard,et al.  Academic Libraries and Research Data Services , 2012 .

[29]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Leadership: The multiple-level approaches , 1995 .

[31]  Michael Witt,et al.  Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Incorporating collaboratory concepts into informatics in support of translational interdisciplinary biomedical research , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[33]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Trust in Digital Repositories , 2013, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[34]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[35]  Jinfang Niu,et al.  Overcoming inadequate documentation , 2009, ASIST.

[36]  Bryn Nelson.  Data sharing: Empty archives , 2009, Nature.

[37]  Elizabeth D. Dalton,et al.  Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide , 2015, PloS one.

[38]  Ayoung Yoon.  "Making a square fit into a circle": Researchers' experiences reusing qualitative data , 2014, ASIST.

[39]  Nai-Chang Cheng,et al.  Programmer perceptions of knowledge-sharing behavior under social cognitive theory , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[40]  Hichang Cho,et al.  Testing an integrative theoretical model of knowledge-sharing behavior in the context of Wikipedia , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  Ann Zimmerman,et al.  Not by metadata alone: the use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse , 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[42]  Graham Pryor,et al.  Multi-scale Data Sharing in the Life Sciences: Some Lessons for Policy Makers , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[43]  Ixchel M. Faniel,et al.  Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues’ Data , 2010, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[44]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  A comparative study of data reuse among quantitative social scientists and archaeologists , 2013 .

[45]  V Szabo,et al.  Secondary analysis of qualitative data. , 1997, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[46]  C. Borgman,et al.  If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology , 2013, PloS one.

[47]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  The conundrum of sharing research data , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[48]  Andrew C. Simpson,et al.  Collaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND Case Study , 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[49]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[50]  N. House.  Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information , 2002 .

[51]  A. Vickers.  Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials , 2006, Trials.

[52]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[53]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research , 2000 .

[54]  Eric G Campbell,et al.  Data-sharing and data-withholding in genetics and the life sciences: results of a national survey of technology transfer officers. , 2003, Journal of health care law & policy.

[55]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics , 2008 .

[56]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization , 2011 .

[57]  I. Ajzen,et al.  The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior , 2005 .

[58]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Data at work: supporting sharing in science and engineering , 2003, GROUP.

[59]  M. Hagger,et al.  Integrating the theory of planned behaviour and self-determination theory in health behaviour: a meta-analysis. , 2009, British journal of health psychology.

[60]  D. Hofmann.  An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models , 1997 .

[61]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[62]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[63]  Carina Lansing,et al.  Capturing and supporting contexts for scientific data sharing via the biological sciences collaboratory , 2004, CSCW.

[64]  Ayoung Yoon.  Visible Evidence of Invisible Quality Dimensions and the Role of Data Management , 2016 .

[65]  Jared Lyle,et al.  The Enduring Value of Social Science Research: The Use and Reuse of Primary Research Data , 2010, iPRES.

[66]  Ayoung Yoon,et al.  Data reusers' trust development , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[67]  Angus Whyte,et al.  Open Science in Practice: Researcher Perspectives and Participation , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[68]  J. Calder.  Survey research methods , 1998, Medical education.

[69]  M. Appelbaum,et al.  Some issues of conducting secondary analyses , 1991 .

[70]  Devan Ray Donaldson,et al.  Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositories , 2012 .

[71]  Lynn Yarmey,et al.  Data Stewardship: Environmental Data Curation and a Web-of-Repositories , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[72]  E. Berger,et al.  Ensuring the integrity, accessibility, and stewardship of research data in the digital age , 2009 .

[73]  Youngseek Kim,et al.  Institutional and individual factors affecting scientists' data‐sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[74]  Feng-Yang Kuo,et al.  A study of the intention-action gap in knowledge sharing practices , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[75]  W. Powell.  Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis , 1991 .

[76]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[77]  Ben Anderson,et al.  What Are Data? The Many Kinds of Data and Their Implications for Data Re-Use , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[78]  Ayoung Yoon,et al.  Data Reuse and Users’ Trust Judgments: Toward Trusted Data Curation , 2015 .

[79]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .