Die radiologische Verlaufskontrolle von primären Hüft- und Knieendoprothesen – Empfehlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Endoprothetik (AE)

Grundsätzlich ist zu beachten, dass gemäß den gesetzlichen Bestimmungen (Strahlenschutzverordnung, StrlSchV) alle Untersuchungen mit der Anwendung von Röntgenstrahlen am Menschen nur dann erlaubt sind, wenn eine Ärztin oder ein Arzt mit der erforderlichen Fachkunde im Strahlenschutz hierfür die rechtfertigende Indikation patientenindividuell gestellt hat. Das bedeutet, dass die vorliegende Empfehlung nicht verbindlich sein kann, sondern der jeweilige Untersuchende immer im Einzelfall die rechtfertigende Indikation prüfen muss. Im Folgenden soll erläutert werden, wann auch bei beschwerdearmen bzw. beschwerdefreien Patientinnen und Patienten radiologische Verlaufskontrollen nach primären Hüftund Knieendoprothesen durch wissenschaftlich bekannte Versagensmechanismen und Versagenszeitpunkte sinnvoll sind und die rechtfertigende Indikation damit gegeben wäre.

[1]  Jörg Lützner,et al.  Analysis of Total Knee Arthroplasty revision causes , 2018, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[2]  B. Levine,et al.  Cementless vs Cemented Tibial Fixation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  D. Howie,et al.  Proximal translation of > 1 mm within the first two years of revision total hip arthroplasty correctly predicts whether or not an acetabular component is loose in 80% of cases: A CASE‐CONTROL STUDY WITH CONFIRMED INTRA‐OPERATIVE OUTCOMES , 2017, The bone & joint journal.

[4]  D. Howie,et al.  The diagnostic performance of radiographic criteria to detect aseptic acetabular component loosening after revision total hip arthroplasty , 2017, The bone & joint journal.

[5]  K. Nilsson,et al.  Trabecular metal tibial knee component still stable at 10 years , 2016, Acta orthopaedica.

[6]  T. Bruckner,et al.  Early Migration Predicts Aseptic Loosening of Cementless Femoral Stems: A Long-term Study , 2016, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  F. Vanhoenacker,et al.  Postoperative radiograph of the hip arthroplasty: what the radiologist should know , 2015, Insights into Imaging.

[8]  C. Perka,et al.  Current failure mechanisms after knee arthroplasty have changed: polyethylene wear is less common in revision surgery. , 2015, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Kwang-Won Lee,et al.  Cemented versus cementless fixation of a tibial component in LCS mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a single surgeon. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years? , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  A. Haleem,et al.  Early corrosion-related failure of the rejuvenate modular total hip replacement. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  W. Hozack,et al.  Modular taper junction corrosion and failure: how to approach a recalled total hip arthroplasty implant. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  A. Eskelinen,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty with an uncemented trabecular metal tibial component: a registry-based analysis. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  T. Link,et al.  Monitoring and risk of progression of osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. , 2012, Instructional course lectures.

[15]  Bart L Kaptein,et al.  Good diagnostic performance of early migration as a predictor of late aseptic loosening of acetabular cups: results from ten years of follow-up with Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  Paul C. Celestre,et al.  Disappointing short-term results with the DePuy ASR XL metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  Kevin Ong,et al.  The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  P. Beaulé,et al.  Aseptic stem loosening in primary THA: migration analysis of cemented and cementless fixation , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[19]  A. Björkman,et al.  Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[20]  Sally C. York,et al.  Long-term follow-up care recommendations after total hip and knee arthroplasty: results of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons' member survey. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  E. Valstar,et al.  Hydroxyapatite augmentation of the porous coating improves fixation of tibial components. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.