A Comparison of ocular Artifact removal Methods for Block Design based Electroencephalography Experiments

Eye movements and their contribution to electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings as ocular artifacts (OAs) are well studied. Yet their existence is typically regarded as impeding analysis. A widely accepted bypass is artifact avoidance. OA processing is often reduced to rejecting contaminated data. To overcome loss of data and restriction of behavior, research groups have proposed various correction methods. State of the art approaches are data driven and typically require OAs to be uncorrelated with brain activity. This does not necessarily hold for visuomotor tasks. To prevent correlated signals, we examined a two block approach. In a first block, subjects performed saccades and blinks, according to a visually guided paradigm. We then fitted 5 artifact removal algorithms to this data. To test their stationarity regarding artifact attenuation and preservation of brain activity, we recorded a second block one hour later. We found that saccades and blinks could still be attenuated to chance level, while brain activity during rest trials could be retained.

[1]  C. Braun,et al.  Hand Movement Direction Decoded from MEG and EEG , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Trent J. Bradberry,et al.  Reconstructing Three-Dimensional Hand Movements from Noninvasive Electroencephalographic Signals , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Using a Noninvasive Decoding Method to Classify Rhythmic Movement Imaginations of the Arm in Two Planes , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg,et al.  Saccadic spike potentials in gamma-band EEG: Characterization, detection and suppression , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  Stephanie Brandl,et al.  Robust artifactual independent component classification for BCI practitioners , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Recipes for the linear analysis of EEG , 2005, NeuroImage.

[8]  R. Johansson,et al.  Eye–Hand Coordination during Learning of a Novel Visuomotor Task , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Seong-Whan Lee,et al.  Decoding Three-Dimensional Trajectory of Executed and Imagined Arm Movements From Electroencephalogram Signals , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  G R Müller-Putz,et al.  From classic motor imagery to complex movement intention decoding: The noninvasive Graz-BCI approach. , 2016, Progress in brain research.

[11]  Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al.  Evaluating decoding performance of upper limb imagined trajectories during center-out reaching tasks , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[12]  Begoña Garcia-Zapirain,et al.  EEG artifact removal—state-of-the-art and guidelines , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  Panagiotis D. Bamidis,et al.  REG-ICA: A hybrid methodology combining Blind Source Separation and regression techniques for the rejection of ocular artifacts , 2011, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[14]  P. König,et al.  Combining EEG and eye tracking: identification, characterization, and correction of eye movement artifacts in electroencephalographic data , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..