Injury severity of pedestrian crashes in Singapore

Singapore is a highly urbanized city-state country where walking is an important mode of travel. Pedestrians form about 25 per cent of road fatalities every year, making them one of the most vulnerable road user groups in Singapore. Engineering measures like provision of overhead pedestrian crossings and raised zebra crossings tend to address pedestrian safety in general, but there may be occasions where pedestrians are particularly vulnerable so that targeted interventions are more appropriate. The objective of this study is to identify factors and situations that affect the injury severity of pedestrians involved in traffic crashes. Six years of crash data from 2003 to 2008 containing around four thousands pedestrian crashes at roadway segments were analyzed. Injury severity of pedestriansmrecorded as slight injury, major injury and fatalmwere modeled as a function of roadway characteristics, traffic features, environmental factors and pedestrian demographics by an ordered probit model. Results suggest that the injury severity of pedestrians involved in crashes during night time is higher indicating that pedestrian visibility during night is a key issue in pedestrian safety. The likelihood of fatal or serious injuries is higher for crashes on roads with high speed limit, center and median lane of multi-lane roads, school zones, roads with two-way divided traffic type, and when pedestrians cross the roads. Elderly pedestrians appear to be involved in fatal and serious injury crashes more when they attempt to cross the road without using nearby crossing facilities. Specific countermeasures are recommended based on the findings of this study.

[1]  Hoong Chor Chin,et al.  An analysis of motorcycle injury and vehicle damage severity using ordered probit models. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[2]  Ali S Al-Ghamdi,et al.  Pedestrian-vehicle crashes and analytical techniques for stratified contingency tables. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  L. Paulozzi,et al.  United States pedestrian fatality rates by vehicle type , 2005, Injury Prevention.

[4]  Hampton C Gabler,et al.  The fatality and injury risk of light truck impacts with pedestrians in the United States. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  J Luoma,et al.  Effects of retroreflector positioning on nighttime recognition of pedestrians. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Ashim Kumar Debnath,et al.  Sustainable, safe, smart—three key elements of Singapore’s evolving transport policies , 2013 .

[7]  South America,et al.  Passenger Transport Mode Shares in World Cities , 2011 .

[8]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  A clustering regression approach: A comprehensive injury severity analysis of pedestrian-vehicle cr , 2013 .

[9]  Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson,et al.  Age and pedestrian injury severity in motor-vehicle crashes: a heteroskedastic logit analysis. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Shakil Mohammad Rifaat,et al.  Effect of street pattern on the severity of crashes involving vulnerable road users. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of vehicle-pedestrian crashes at intersections in Florida. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Patricia C Dischinger,et al.  Pedestrian injuries and vehicle type in Maryland, 1995-1999. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  N N Sze,et al.  Diagnostic analysis of the logistic model for pedestrian injury severity in traffic crashes. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  B S Roudsari,et al.  Pedestrian crashes: higher injury severity and mortality rate for light truck vehicles compared with passenger vehicles , 2004, Injury Prevention.