Instructional design using an in-house built teaching assistant robot to enhance elementary school English-as-a-foreign-language learning

This paper presents a design for a cutting-edge English program in which elementary school learners of English as a foreign language in Taiwan had lively interactions with a teaching assistant robot. Three dimensions involved in the design included (1) a pleasant and interactive classroom environment as the learning context, (2) a teaching assistant robot designed and built by the researchers as instructional technology (instructional tool/medium), and (3) the need for improved motivation and learning outcomes and positive learning experiences of the students as the core research problem. This Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) led to better pedagogical effects on learning and teaching by (1) employing a vivid, enjoyable teaching approach; (2) adopting practical, interesting learning materials; and (3) creating a natural, enjoyable learning context. Both quantitative and qualitative findings of this study indicate that the students' English learning experiences were enhanced, as were their motivation and learning outcomes as a result of this HRI. This paper, instead of merely suggesting design criteria for robots, provides a set of instructional design guidelines that other researchers can follow to create an innovative and enjoyable English classroom that employs an interactive robot as an assistant for enhancing English acquisition while simultaneously reducing the pressure and teaching load of the English instructors.

[1]  Sonya S. Kwak,et al.  DESIGN FACTORS FOR EXTERNAL FORM OF ROBOTS AS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHING ASSISTANTS , 2008 .

[2]  Alissa Nicole Antle,et al.  Are tangibles more fun?: comparing children's enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces , 2008, TEI.

[3]  Sungjin Lee,et al.  Cognitive Effects of Robot-Assisted Language Learning on Oral Skills , 2010 .

[4]  Amy F Brandon,et al.  Constructivism Theory Analysis and Application to Curricula , 2010, Nursing education perspectives.

[5]  Megan M. McClelland,et al.  Self-regulation and academic achievement in elementary school children. , 2011, New directions for child and adolescent development.

[6]  Michael Marek,et al.  Enhancing learner motivation to study English via videoconferencing with a native speaker , 2008 .

[7]  Jeonghye Han,et al.  Analysis on Children's Tolerance to Weak Recognition of Storytelling Robots , 2009, J. Convergence Inf. Technol..

[8]  Norman L. Kauffmann,et al.  Students Abroad: Strangers at Home : Education for a Global Society , 1992 .

[9]  Frank Klassner,et al.  A case study of LEGO Mindstorms'#8482; suitability for artificial intelligence and robotics courses at the college level , 2002, SIGCSE '02.

[10]  Marie-Laure Ryan.  Narrative across media : the languages of storytelling , 2004 .

[11]  Jorma Enkenberg,et al.  Instructional design and emerging teaching models in higher education , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Po-Yao Chao,et al.  Exploring the Possibility of Using Humanoid Robots as Instructional Tools for Teaching a Second Language in Primary School , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[13]  Yavuz Akbulut.  Implications of Two Well-Known Models For Instructional Designers In Distance Education:Dick-Carey Versus Morrison-Ross-Kemp , 2007 .

[14]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Communication robots for elementary schools , 2005 .

[15]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  A joyful classroom learning system with robot learning companion for children to learn mathematics m , 2011 .

[16]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Integrating book, digital content and robot for enhancing elementary school students' learning of English , 2011 .

[17]  Batia Laufer,et al.  What Lexical Information Do L2 Learners Select in a CALL Dictionary and How Does It Affect Word Retention , 2000 .

[18]  Michael Marek,et al.  The Impact of Teleconferencing with Native English Speakers on English Learning by Taiwanese Students. , 2009 .

[19]  Jong-Won Kim.  The Effectiveness of Robot Pronunciation Training for Second Language Acquisition by Children: Segmental and Suprasegmental Feature Analysis Approaches. , 2011 .

[20]  Z. Dörnyei.  Researching complex dynamic systems: ‘Retrodictive qualitative modelling’ in the language classroom , 2011, Language Teaching.

[21]  Elisabeth M. Elliott,et al.  Total physical response and Russian multi- and unidirectional verbs of motion: A case study in acquisition , 2009 .

[22]  Jeonghye Han.  Robot-Aided Learning and r-Learning Services , 2010 .

[23]  Jozef Colpaert,et al.  Elicitation of language learners' personal goals as design concepts , 2010 .

[24]  Chih-Wei Chang,et al.  Robot as a Storytelling Partner in the English Classroom - Preliminary Discussion , 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007).

[25]  Jerry B. Weinberg,et al.  Robotics in education: Low-cost platforms for teaching integrated systems , 2003, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[26]  James J. Asher,et al.  Learning Another Language Through Actions: The Complete Teacher's Guidebook , 1988 .

[27]  Sonya S. Kwak,et al.  A Study on External Form Design Factors for Robots as Elementary School Teaching Assistants , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[28]  Arif Sirinterlikci,et al.  Active Learning through Toy Design and Development. , 2009 .

[29]  Kieran Egan,et al.  Teaching as Story Telling: An Alternative Approach to Teaching and Curriculum in the Elementary School , 1989 .

[30]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  One Mouse per Child: interpersonal computer for individual arithmetic practice , 2012, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[31]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Collaborative robotic instruction: A graph teaching experience , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Aya Matsuda,et al.  English as an international language: A curriculum blueprint , 2011 .

[33]  Dongho Kim,et al.  r-Learning services for elementary school students with a teaching assistant robot , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[34]  Cagri Tugrul Mart.  How to Sustain Students' Motivation in a Learning Environment. , 2011 .

[35]  Michael Marek,et al.  Environmental factors affecting computer assisted language learning success: a Complex Dynamic Systems conceptual model , 2014 .

[36]  I-Chung Ke,et al.  From EFL to English as an international and scientific language: analysing Taiwan's high-school English textbooks in the period 1952–2009 , 2012 .

[37]  Yuan Kong,et al.  A Brief Discussion on Motivation and Ways to Motivate Students in English Language Learning , 2009 .

[38]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[39]  Chih-Wei Chang,et al.  Improving the authentic learning experience by integrating robots into the mixed-reality environment , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[40]  Sandra J. Savignon,et al.  Teaching English as Communication: a global perspective , 2003 .

[41]  Jeonghye Han,et al.  Comparative Study on the Educational Use of Home Robots for Children , 2008, J. Inf. Process. Syst..

[42]  Gwendolyn Cartledge,et al.  Instructional Accommodations for Children with Special Needs in Inclusive Settings , 2010 .

[43]  R. Clément,et al.  Aptitude, Attitude and Motivation in Second Language Proficiency: A Test Of Clément's Model , 1985 .