LiDAR measurements of canopy structure predict spatial distribution of a tropical mature forest primate

Abstract The three-dimensional spatial configuration of forest habitats affects the capacity of arboreal vertebrates to move, access food, and avoid predation. However, vegetation sampling over large areas from a sufficient density of field plots to quantify fine-grained heterogeneity in canopy structure is logistically difficult, labor-intensive, time-consuming and costly, particularly in remote areas of tropical forests. We used airborne waveform light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data acquired over the southeastern Peruvian Amazon in combination with detailed field data on a population of bald-faced saki monkeys ( Pithecia irrorata ) to assess the utility of LiDAR-derived indices of canopy structure in describing parameters of preferred forest types for this arboreal primate. Forest structure parameters represented by LiDAR measurements were significantly different between home range areas used by sakis and those that were not used. Home range areas used by sakis represented a predictable subset of available forest areas, generally those containing the tallest and most uniform canopies. Differences observed within a 335-ha focal area occupied by five previously habituated and systematically followed study groups were consistent across the wider study landscape (6,400 ha): sakis were missing from areas of low-statured, heterogeneous canopies, but they occupied adjacent areas dominated by taller and less variable canopies. These findings provide novel insights into the relationship between vegetation structure and habitat use by a tropical arboreal vertebrate and demonstrate that high-resolution, three-dimensional remote sensing measurements can be useful in predicting habitat occupancy and selection by forest canopy species.

[1]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Bird Species Diversity , 1961 .

[2]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Combined effects of climate and land‐use change on the future of humid tropical forests , 2010 .

[3]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  Modelling relationships between birds and vegetation structure using airborne LiDAR data: a review with case studies from agricultural and woodland environments , 2005 .

[4]  Andrew Thomas Hudak,et al.  LiDAR Utility for Natural Resource Managers , 2009, Remote. Sens..

[5]  S. Goetz,et al.  Laser remote sensing of canopy habitat heterogeneity as a predictor of bird species richness in an eastern temperate forest, USA , 2006 .

[6]  D. Youlatos Multivariate analysis of organismal and habitat parameters in two neotropical primate communities. , 2004, American journal of physical anthropology.

[7]  M. Groom,et al.  How do frugivores track resources? Insights from spatial analyses of bird foraging in a tropical forest , 2004, Oecologia.

[8]  J. Barlow,et al.  Ecological responses to el Niño-induced surface fires in central Brazilian Amazonia: management implications for flammable tropical forests. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Carnegie Airborne Observatory: in-flight fusion of hyperspectral imaging and waveform light detection and ranging for three-dimensional studies of ecosystems , 2007 .

[10]  Nathaniel E Seavy,et al.  Riparian bird response to vegetation structure: a multiscale analysis using LiDAR measurements of canopy height. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[11]  E. Heymann,et al.  Primates of the Río Curaray, Northern Peruvian Amazon , 2002, International Journal of Primatology.

[12]  B. Nelson,et al.  Fire favours expansion of bamboo-dominated forests in the south-west Amazon , 2010, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[13]  B. Cade,et al.  Estimating effects of limiting factors with regression quantiles , 1999 .

[14]  S. Goetz,et al.  Lidar remote sensing variables predict breeding habitat of a Neotropical migrant bird. , 2010, Ecology.

[15]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Elephants in space and time , 2005 .

[16]  C. Potter,et al.  Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire , 1999, Nature.

[17]  P. Garber Foraging Strategies Among Living Primates , 1987 .

[18]  J. Terborgh,et al.  The Phenology of Tropical Forests: Adaptive Significance and Consequences for Primary Consumers* , 1993 .

[19]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Long-term effects of fragmentation and fragment properties on bird species richness in Hawaiian forests , 2010 .

[20]  M. D. Warner Assessing habitat utilization by neotropical primates: A new approach , 2007, Primates.

[21]  G. Powell,et al.  Regional-scale heterogeneity in primate community structure at multiple undisturbed forest sites across south-eastern Peru , 2011, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[22]  A. Gentry,et al.  Tropical Forest Structure and the Distribution of Gliding and Prehensile-Tailed Vertebrates , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[23]  R. Happel Ecology of Pithecia hirsuta in Peru , 1982 .

[24]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  Modelling relationships between organisms and vegetation structure using airborne LiDAR data , 2005 .

[25]  Suzanne Palminteri Determinants of primate distribution and abundance in south-western Amazonia, with a focus on bald-faced saki monkeys (Pithecia irrorata) , 2010 .

[26]  C. Peres Structure and spatial organization of an Amazonian terra firme forest primate community , 1993, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[27]  Shelley A. Hinsley,et al.  Quantifying woodland structure and habitat quality for birds using airborne laser scanning , 2002 .

[28]  C. Peres,et al.  Foraging ecology and use of space in wild golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia) , 1997, American journal of primatology.

[29]  W. Kinzey New World Primate Field Studies: What's in it for Anthropology? , 1986 .

[30]  S. Walker The Evolution of Positional Behavior in the Saki-Uakaris (Pithecia, Chiropotes, and Cacajao) , 1996 .

[31]  M. Boyce,et al.  WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 2005 .

[32]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[33]  G. Powell,et al.  Advantages of granivory in seasonal environments: feeding ecology of an arboreal seed predator in Amazonian forests , 2012 .

[34]  G. Powell,et al.  High-resolution forest carbon stocks and emissions in the Amazon , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  C. Peres Notes on the ecology of buffy saki monkeys (Pithecia albicans, Gray 1860): A canopy seed‐predator , 1993, American journal of primatology.

[36]  C. Peres,et al.  Primate assemblage structure in amazonian flooded and unflooded forests , 2005, American journal of primatology.

[37]  L. Vierling,et al.  Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling , 2008 .

[38]  Douglas H. Johnson THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[39]  G. Asner,et al.  A universal airborne LiDAR approach for tropical forest carbon mapping , 2011, Oecologia.

[40]  Habitat Selection and Use of Space by Bald-Faced Sakis (Pithecia irrorata) in Southwestern Amazonia: Lessons from a Multiyear, Multigroup Study , 2012, International Journal of Primatology.

[41]  Shelley A. Hinsley,et al.  Cover: Predicting habitat quality for Great Tits (Parus major) with airborne laser scanning data , 2004 .

[42]  B. Cade,et al.  A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists , 2003 .

[43]  M. Christman,et al.  The use of degraded and shade cocoa forests by Endangered golden-headed lion tamarins Leontopithecus chrysomelas , 2004, Oryx.

[44]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.