BACKGROUND
Monitoring of urine pH, often done in the patient s home, is essential for proper clinical treatment and management of conditions such as urolithiasis.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement in pH readings between a standard laboratory method and methods readily available for home monitoring. The influence of refrigerated storage on urine pH was also examined.
METHODS
Urine samples were obtained by cystocentesis from 40 clinically healthy cats, and pH was measured within 2 hours of collection. Each sample was evaluated using pH paper, urinalysis reagent strip, 2 brands of portable pH meters (Chek-Mite, Corning, Corning, NY, USA; and Checker 1, Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA), and a standard laboratory benchtop pH meter. Urine samples were refrigerated, and a second pH reading was obtained with the laboratory benchtop meter after 24 hours. The degree of agreement was assessed among the different methods, with the laboratory benchtop pH meter as the reference method.
RESULTS
The closest agreement was obtained with the Chek-Mite portable pH meter and least agreement with the Checker 1 portable pH meter, which had a constant negative bias of 0.31 units due to expiration of the electrode. As expected, pH paper and reagent strips had poor and intermediate agreement, respectively. The reagent strip method had a negative bias of 0.12 units when compared with the benchtop pH meter and wide disagreement at the low pH end. The reagent strip did not agree strongly with the reference method; only 50% of values were within 0.25 pH units of each other. The difference in pH between 0 hours (6.57 +/- 0.54) and 24 hours of refrigeration (6.61 +/- 0.53) was not considered clinically significant.
CONCLUSION
Portable pH meters are excellent for monitoring urine pH at home as long as attention is given to electrode maintenance. Urine can be collected at home and kept refrigerated, and pH may be measured reliably within 24 hours using the reference method or a portable pH meter.
[1]
J. Naylor,et al.
A comparison of pH determination methods in food animal practice.
,
2001,
The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.
[2]
C. Buffington,et al.
Agreement between two methods for measuring urine pH in cats and dogs.
,
1998,
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
[3]
C. Buffington,et al.
Intermittent alkaline urine in a cat fed an acidifying diet.
,
1996,
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
[4]
A. L. Jensen,et al.
Comparing laboratory tests using the difference plot method.
,
1993,
Veterinary clinical pathology.
[5]
E. R. Skoch,et al.
Influence of diet on urine pH and the Feline urological syndrome
,
1991
.
[6]
D. Wilson,et al.
The Ames Clinitek 200/Multistix 9 urinalysis method compared with manual and microscopic methods.
,
1987,
Clinical chemistry.
[7]
G. P. James,et al.
Accuracy and precision of urinary pH determinations using two commercially available dipsticks.
,
1978,
American journal of clinical pathology.