Integration of post-combustion capture and storage into a pulverized coal-fired power plant

Abstract Post-combustion CO 2 capture and storage (CCS) presents a promising strategy to capture, compress, transport and store CO 2 from a high volume–low pressure flue gas stream emitted from a fossil fuel-fired power plant. This work undertakes the simulation of CO 2 capture and compression integration into an 800 MW e supercritical coal-fired power plant using chemical process simulators. The focus is not only on the simulation of full load of flue gas stream into the CO 2 capture and compression, but also, on the impact of a partial load. The result reveals that the energy penalty of a low capture efficiency, for example, at 50% capture efficiency with 10% flue gas load is higher than for 90% flue gas load at the equivalent capture efficiency by about 440 kWh e /tonne CO 2 . The study also addresses the effect of CO 2 capture performance by different coal ranks. It is found that lignite pulverized coal (PC)-fired power plant has a higher energy requirement than subbituminous and bituminous PC-fired power plants by 40.1 and 98.6 MW e , respectively. In addition to the investigation of energy requirement, other significant parameters including energy penalty, plant efficiency, amine flow rate and extracted steam flow rate, are also presented. The study reveals that operating at partial load, for example at half load with 90% CO 2 capture efficiency, as compared with full load, reduces the energy penalty, plant efficiency drop, amine flow rate and extracted steam flow rate by 9.9%, 24.4%, 50.0% and 49.9%, respectively. In addition, the effect of steam extracted from different locations from a series of steam turbine with the objective to achieve the lowest possible energy penalty is evaluated. The simulation shows that a low extracted steam pressure from a series of steam turbines, for example at 300 kPa, minimizes the energy penalty by up to 25.3%.

[1]  H. M. Kvamsdal,et al.  Dynamic modeling and simulation of a CO2 absorber column for post-combustion CO2 capture , 2009 .

[2]  Stanley M. Walas,et al.  Chemical Process Equipment : Selection and Design , 1988 .

[3]  Luis M. Romeo,et al.  Designing a supercritical steam cycle to integrate the energy requirements of CO2 amine scrubbing , 2008 .

[4]  Xiao Luo,et al.  Comparison and validation of simulation codes against sixteen sets of data from four different pilot plants , 2009 .

[5]  Finn Andrew Tobiesen,et al.  Modeling of Blast Furnace CO 2 Capture Using Amine Absorbents , 2007 .

[6]  Walter R. Niessen,et al.  Combustion and Incineration Processes: Applications in Environmental Engineering, Third Edition , 2002 .

[7]  Don W. Green,et al.  Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 2007 .

[8]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Dynamic operation of amine scrubbing in response to electricity demand and pricing , 2009 .

[9]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Integrating MEA Regeneration with CO2 Compression and Peaking to Reduce CO2 Capture Costs , 2005 .

[10]  Sung Hyun Kim,et al.  Correlation and Prediction of the Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Alkanolamine and Mixed Alkanolamine Solutions , 2002 .

[11]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Identifying Cost-Effective CO2 Control Levels for Amine-Based CO2 Capture Systems , 2006 .

[12]  Jin-Won Park,et al.  Economic comparison between coal-fired and liquefied natural gas combined cycle power plants considering carbon tax: Korean case , 2008 .

[13]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Absorber model for CO2 capture by monoethanolamine - application to CASTOR pilot results , 2009 .

[14]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Maximising the effectiveness of post combustion CO2 capture systems , 2005 .

[15]  E. Kakaras,et al.  Computer simulation studies for the integration of an external dryer into a Greek lignite-fired power plant , 2002 .

[16]  Axel Meisen,et al.  Simulation of pilot plant and industrial CO2-MEA absorbers , 1993 .

[17]  B. Metz IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[18]  Meihong Wang,et al.  Dynamic modelling of CO2 absorption for post combustion capture in coal-fired power plants , 2009 .

[19]  G. Versteeg,et al.  CO2 capture from power plants. Part I: A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine , 2007 .

[20]  Amornvadee Veawab,et al.  Integration of CO2 capture unit using single- and blended-amines into supercritical coal-fired power plants: Implications for emission and energy management , 2007 .

[21]  Jj Dooley,et al.  An Assessment of the Commercial Availability of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Technologies as of June 2009 , 2009 .

[22]  I. G. Mason,et al.  Carbon capture and storage: Fundamental thermodynamics and current technology , 2009 .

[23]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  Optimization of carbon capture percentage for technical and economic impact of near-term CCS implementation at coal-fired power plants , 2009 .