Target and non-target effects on the invertebrate community of Vip cotton, a new insecticidal transgenic

A new transgenic cotton producing the Vegetative Insecticidal Protein (Vip) is being developed to control Lepidopteran pests, especially Helicoverpa larvae. Before its introduction its efficacy against Helicoverpa larvae under field conditions needs to be confirmed, and any non-target effects it may have on the arthropod community need to be identified. We conducted field trials to compare the arthropod community in unsprayed conventional (Sicala 40) and Vip (Coker 312 Vip3A, event 102) cotton using visual searches, beatsheets, and suction samplers at 2 sites in Australia. At both sites, Vip controlled Helicoverpa larvae leading to much higher boll counts. There were no major differences in either species richness or diversity of the beneficial and non-target communities between Vip and conventional cotton, although cotton cultivar accounted for 2–7% of the variance in arthropod communities. There was no detrimental effect of Vip cotton on egg parasitoids. The number of predatory beetles and the pest mirid Creotiades dilutus (Stal) was higher in the Vip, although the increase in mirids was probably the result of more food (bolls) in the Vip crop. In a small plot experiment, we found higher numbers of whitefly in Vip, but this may be driven by differences in leaf hair between the cotton cultivars. Vip cotton appeared to have little effect on the arthropod community other than on Helicoverpa. As such it has the potential to be a useful tool in the management of Helicoverpa and may relieve resistance pressure on existing Bt cultivars (transgenic cotton containing genes for insecticidal Cry proteins), thereby increasing the durability of both technologies.

[1]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Communication , 1950 .

[2]  M. Koziel,et al.  Vip3A, a novel Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein with a wide spectrum of activities against lepidopteran insects. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Timothy J. Dennehy,et al.  Arthropod Abundance and Diversity in Bt and Non-Bt Cotton Fields , 2004 .

[4]  Matin Qaim,et al.  Bt Cotton in India: Field Trial Results and Economic Projections , 2003 .

[5]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .

[6]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[7]  M. Adang,et al.  Dual Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac and Cry2Aa Toxins in Heliothis virescens Suggests Multiple Mechanisms of Resistance , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[8]  Béla Tóthmérész,et al.  Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering , 1995 .

[9]  M. K. Lee,et al.  Brush border membrane binding properties of Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3A toxin to Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa zea midguts. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[10]  Michael L. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1997 .

[11]  S. Deutscher.  Integrated Pest Management Guidelines for Cotton Production Systems in Australia , 2005 .

[12]  F. S. Walters,et al.  The Mode of Action of the Bacillus thuringiensis Vegetative Insecticidal Protein Vip3A Differs from That of Cry1Ab δ-Endotoxin , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  Andrew K. Jones,et al.  Initial frequency of alleles for resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in field populations of Heliothis virescens. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  M. Kannan,et al.  Impact of insecticides on sucking pests and natural enemy complex of transgenic cotton , 2004 .

[15]  R. Luttrell,et al.  Cotton Pest Management: Part 1. A Worldwide Perspective , 1994 .

[16]  E. Natwick,et al.  Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) biotype B colonisation and leaf morphology relationships in upland cotton cultivars , 1999 .

[17]  M. Koziel,et al.  The Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein Vip3A lyses midgut epithelium cells of susceptible insects , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[18]  W. Donovan,et al.  Gene knockout demonstrates that vip3A contributes to the pathogenesis of Bacillus thuringiensis toward Agrotis ipsilon and Spodoptera exigua. , 2001, Journal of invertebrate pathology.

[19]  F. Perlak,et al.  Development and commercial use of Bollgard cotton in the USA--early promises versus today's reality. , 2001, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[20]  Paul J. Van den Brink,et al.  Principal response curves: Analysis of time‐dependent multivariate responses of biological community to stress , 1999 .

[21]  P. Room,et al.  SEASONAL OCCURRENCE OF INSECTS OTHER THAN HELIOTHIS SPP. FEEDING ON COTTON IN THE NAMOI VALLEY OF NEW SOUTH WALES , 1977 .

[22]  D. Gerling,et al.  Biological control of Bemisia tabaci using predators and parasitoids , 2001 .

[23]  G. Dively,et al.  Impact of Transgenic VIP3A × Cry1Ab Lepidopteran-resistant Field Corn on the Nontarget Arthropod Community , 2005 .

[24]  S. Downes,et al.  Monitoring and adaptive resistance management in Australia for Bt-cotton: current status and future challenges. , 2007, Journal of invertebrate pathology.

[25]  Steven E. Naranjo,et al.  Long-Term Assessment of the Effects of Transgenic Bt Cotton on the Abundance of Nontarget Arthropod Natural Enemies , 2005 .

[26]  G. G. Kennedy,et al.  Genetic engineering in IPM: Bt cotton. , 2000 .

[27]  F. Ge,et al.  Diversity of Arthropod Communities in Transgenic Bt Cotton and Nontransgenic Cotton Agroecosystems , 2003 .

[28]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[29]  S. Naranjo.  Long-Term Assessment of the Effects of TransgenicBtCotton on the Abundance of Nontarget Arthropod Natural Enemies , 2005 .

[30]  M. Whitehouse,et al.  A Comparison of Arthropod Communities in Transgenic Bt and Conventional Cotton in Australia , 2005 .

[31]  E. H. Simpson.  Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[32]  L. Masson,et al.  One gene in diamondback moth confers resistance to four Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  G. D. Buntin,et al.  Effect of Bacillus thuringiensis Transgenic Corn for Lepidopteran Control on Nontarget Arthropods , 2005 .

[34]  Gary P. Fitt,et al.  Implementation and Impact of Transgenic Bt Cottons in Australia , 2004 .