Can clean energy adoption and international trade contribute to the achievement of India’s 2070 carbon neutrality agenda? Evidence using quantile ARDL measures
暂无分享,去创建一个
Muntasir Murshed | Vishal Dagar | Haider Mahmood | M. Hossain | Soumen Rej | A. Bandyopadhyay | Pinki Bera | Narasingha Das
[1] Mohd Arshad Ansari. Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets curve for ASEAN: A comparison between ecological footprint and carbon dioxide emissions , 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
[2] U. Pata,et al. How effective are renewable energy, tourism, trade openness, and foreign direct investment on CO_2 emissions? An EKC analysis for ASEAN countries , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[3] E. Uche,et al. Re-examining the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) for India via the multiple threshold NARDL procedure , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[4] I. Ozturk,et al. Can energy productivity gains harness the carbon dioxide‐inhibiting agenda of the Next 11 countries? Implications for achieving sustainable development , 2022, Sustainable Development.
[5] Mohammad Razib Hossain,et al. Energy mix with technological innovation to abate carbon emission: fresh evidence from Mexico applying wavelet tools and spectral causality , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[6] N. Nwulu,et al. Can Energy Efficiency Help in Achieving Carbon-Neutrality Pledges? A Developing Country Perspective Using Dynamic ARDL Simulations , 2022, Sustainability.
[7] I. Ozturk,et al. The roles of energy efficiency improvement, renewable electricity production, and financial inclusion in stimulating environmental sustainability in the Next Eleven countries , 2022, Renewable Energy.
[8] Barnali Nag,et al. Investigating the role of capital formation to achieve carbon neutrality in India , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[9] F. Bekun,et al. Towards a clean production by exploring the nexus between agricultural ecosystem and environmental degradation using novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[10] F. Bekun,et al. Environmental consequences of foreign direct investment influx and conventional energy consumption: evidence from dynamic ARDL simulation for Turkey , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[11] M. H. Tarazkar,et al. Revisiting global energy efficiency and CO2 emission nexus: fresh evidence from the panel quantile regression model , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[12] Budiono,et al. Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis valid on CO2 emissions in Indonesia? , 2022, International Journal of Environmental Studies.
[13] G. Alam,et al. Does climate change stimulate household vulnerability and income diversity? Evidence from southern coastal region of Bangladesh , 2021, Heliyon.
[14] Soumen Rej,et al. Can nuclear energy fuel an environmentally sustainable economic growth? Revisiting the EKC hypothesis for India , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[15] Z. Rahman,et al. Measuring the simultaneous effects of electricity consumption and production on carbon dioxide emissions (CO2e) in China: New evidence from an EKC-based assessment , 2021 .
[16] A. Alola,et al. Environmental implication of coal and oil energy utilization in Turkey: is the EKC hypothesis related to energy? , 2021 .
[17] Usman Ali,et al. Dynamics of international trade, technology innovation and environmental sustainability: evidence from Asia by accounting for cross-sectional dependence , 2021 .
[18] P. Appiah-Konadu,et al. Electricity consumption and carbon dioxide emissions: The role of trade openness and manufacturing sub-sector output in Ghana , 2021 .
[19] C. Mensah,et al. Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa , 2021 .
[20] Recep Ulucak,et al. An empirical investigation of nuclear energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in India: Bridging IPAT and EKC hypotheses , 2020 .
[21] Kerui Du,et al. Does international trade promote CO2 emission performance? An empirical analysis based on a partially linear functional-coefficient panel data model , 2020 .
[22] Syed Rashid Ali,et al. Consumption of liquefied petroleum gas and the EKC hypothesis in South Asia: evidence from cross-sectionally dependent heterogeneous panel data with structural breaks , 2020 .
[23] S. Koc,et al. Testing validity of the EKC hypothesis in South Korea: role of renewable energy and trade openness , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[24] Kais Saidi,et al. The impact of renewable energy on carbon emissions and economic growth in 15 major renewable energy-consuming countries. , 2020, Environmental research.
[25] Lanouar Charfeddine,et al. Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: A panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis , 2019, Renewable Energy.
[26] Åsa Persson,et al. Governing borderless climate risks: moving beyond the territorial framing of adaptation , 2019, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
[27] Andrew K. Jorgenson,et al. Ecologically unequal exchange: A theory of global environmental in justice , 2019, Sociology Compass.
[28] J. Rogelj,et al. Unintentional unfairness when applying new greenhouse gas emissions metrics at country level , 2019 .
[29] Manoj Sharma,et al. Dynamic causality testing for EKC hypothesis, pollution haven hypothesis and international trade in India , 2018, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development.
[30] M. A. Baloch,et al. The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO2 emissions: an empirical analysis , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[31] Kalim Siddiqui. David Ricardo’s Comparative Advantage and Developing Countries: Myth and Reality , 2018, International Critical Thought.
[32] F. Andersson. International trade and carbon emissions: The role of Chinese institutional and policy reforms. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.
[33] Ali Ahmed,et al. The N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical evaluation using a panel quantile regression approach , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[34] Madhumita Bhattacharya,et al. The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions , 2017 .
[35] M. Azam,et al. Re-visiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Malaysia: Fresh evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach , 2017 .
[36] Xuyi Liu,et al. Does trade openness affect CO2 emissions: evidence from ten newly industrialized countries? , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[37] Korhan K. Gokmenoglu,et al. Testing the EKC hypothesis by considering trade openness, urbanization, and financial development: the case of Turkey , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[38] Umit Bulut,et al. The impacts of non-renewable and renewable energy on CO2 emissions in Turkey , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[39] Ozlem Ozdemir,et al. Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve , 2017 .
[40] Zakaria Zoundi. CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach , 2017 .
[41] Setareh Katircioglu. Investigating the Role of Oil Prices in the Conventional EKC Model: Evidence from Turkey , 2017 .
[42] S. Mitra,et al. The environmental Kuznets curve for carbon dioxide in India and China: Growth and pollution at crossroad , 2017 .
[43] Umit Bulut,et al. The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach , 2016 .
[44] S. B. Youssef,et al. Renewable Energy Consumption and Agriculture: Evidence for Cointegration and Granger causality for Tunisian Economy , 2017 .
[45] Slim Ben Youssef,et al. The role of renewable energy and agriculture in reducing CO2 emissions: evidence for North Africa countries , 2017 .
[46] Y. Shin,et al. Quantile cointegration in the autoregressive distributed-lag modeling framework , 2015 .
[47] Adnan Kasman,et al. CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: A panel data analysis , 2015 .
[48] S. Katircioğlu,et al. Testing the tourism-induced EKC hypothesis: The case of Singapore , 2014 .
[49] Angel Mena-Nieto,et al. System dynamics modeling for renewable energy and CO2 emissions: A case study of Ecuador , 2014 .
[50] Sahar Shafiei,et al. Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A comparative analysis , 2014 .
[51] Baolong Yuan,et al. International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: A case study of Chinas industrial sectors , 2014 .
[52] Y. Shin,et al. Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework , 2013 .
[53] Muhammad Nasir,et al. The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa , 2013 .
[54] Aviral Kumar Tiwari,et al. The environmental Kuzents Curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy , 2012 .
[55] Nicholas Apergis,et al. On the causal dynamics between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in developed and developing countries , 2011 .
[56] B. LeBaron,et al. A test for independence based on the correlation dimension , 1996 .
[57] N. Shafik. Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis , 1994 .
[58] G. Grossman,et al. Economic Growth and the Environment , 1994 .
[59] N. Shafik,et al. Economic Growth and Environmental Quality Time-Series and Cross-Country Evidence , 1992 .