Recognition memory for sentences from spatial descriptions: A test of the episodic construction trace hypothesis

Many researchers believe that when people read spatial descriptions, they construct mental models of the configurations described. Payne (1993) proposed that reading a spatial description produces a memory of the operations used to construct a mental model, anepisodic construction trace. The episodic construction trace hypothesis predicts that memory for a spatial description will be influenced by the degree of overlap between the construction processes required by the original description and the construction processes prompted by an item in a recognition test. The two experiments reported here show that readers of spatial descriptions are more likely to accept sentences in a recognition test that are consistent with the operations used to construct a mental model than to accept sentences that are inconsistent. Consistency with the episodic construction trace leads to both correct recognition of verbatim sentences from the original description and false recognition of sentences that were not present in the original descriptions.

[1]  G. Radvansky,et al.  Mental model organization. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Implicit learning of complex structures: active adaptation and selective processing in acquisition and application , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Tudor S. G. Jones,et al.  Theories of Memory , 1925 .

[5]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension , 1993 .

[6]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  The mental representation of spatial descriptions , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[7]  T. Baguley,et al.  Long-Term Memory for Spatial and Temporal Mental Models Includes Construction Processes and Model Structure , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  B. Tversky,et al.  Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions , 1992 .

[9]  Charles R. Fletcher,et al.  Levels of representation in memory for discourse. , 1994 .

[10]  M. Conway,et al.  Pictures, images, and recollective experience. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  J. Gardiner,et al.  Forgetting in recognition memory with and without recollective experience , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[12]  A. Garnham.  Mental models as representations of discourse and text , 1989 .

[13]  H L Roediger,et al.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[14]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[15]  A. Garnham.  Mental models as representations of text , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[16]  R. Java.  States of awareness following word stem completion , 1994 .

[17]  G. Radvansky,et al.  Mental models and the fan effect. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Limits in perception , 1984 .

[19]  Stephen J. Payne,et al.  Memory for mental models of spatial descriptions: An episodic-construction-trace hypothesis , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Mental Models as Representations of Discourse and Text , 1990 .

[21]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis ☆ , 1990 .

[22]  I. Hunter,et al.  The solving of three-term series problems. , 1957, British journal of psychology.

[23]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[24]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[25]  G. Bower,et al.  Mental Models and Narrative Comprehension: Some Qualifications , 1993 .

[26]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[27]  L. Jacoby.  A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[28]  J. Bransford,et al.  Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach ☆ ☆☆ , 1972 .

[29]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Spatial Descriptions and Referential Continuity , 1982 .

[30]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. , 1969 .

[31]  Charles R. Fletcher,et al.  Surface forms, textbases, and situation models: Recognition memory for three types of textual information , 1990 .

[32]  W. Donaldson,et al.  The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[33]  H. H. Clark.  SPACE, TIME, SEMANTICS, AND THE CHILD , 1973 .

[34]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Incidentally, things in general are particularly determined: An episodic-processing account of implicit learning , 1993 .

[35]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Propositional reasoning by model. , 1992, Psychological review.

[36]  M. Conway.  Cognitive models of memory , 1997 .

[37]  B. Tversky.  Spatial mental models , 1991 .

[38]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Some Perceptual Limitations on Talking About Space , 1984 .

[39]  E. Tulving.  Memory and consciousness. , 1985 .

[40]  Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al.  Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: measuring recollection , 1993 .

[41]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[42]  M. Johnson,et al.  Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[43]  A. Glenberg,et al.  The representation of space in mental models derived from text , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[44]  G. Bower,et al.  Mental models in narrative comprehension. , 1990, Science.

[45]  F. Moore.  Cognitive development and the acquisition of language , 1973 .