Sparse Process Flexibility Structure via Constraint Sampling

Consider the linear optimization problem Z(b) = max{ ∑n i=1 cixi : Ax≤ b; xi ≥ 0, i = 1, . . . , n}, where ci ≥ 0, b ≥ 0, and A is a m × n matrix. If n > m, it is well known that there is an optimal solution x∗ with the property that |{i : xi > 0}| ≤m. In particular, there is no loss in optimality if we discard up to n−m of the variables, retaining only the m variables needed to support the optimal solution x∗. In this paper, we study a generalization of this phenomenon when b is random. We identify a class of condition under which only a sparse support set of variables (much smaller than n) is needed so that the expected value of the optimal solution will be within a factor of (1− ) from Eb(Z(b)). This problem is motivated by the process flexibility problem studied by Jordan and Graves (1995). They showed that by adding a small number of links to the process flexibility structure of a dedicated production system, they can dramatically enhance the ability of the system to match demand with production capacity. This observation has been empirically verified in numerous computational studies, in a variety of production and service systems. Our approach provides a theoretical justification to this phenomenon under appropriate conditions. We also discuss applications of this approach to a class of transshipment problem.

[1]  Enver Yücesan,et al.  The Multi-Location Transshipment Problem , 2004 .

[2]  Morris A. Cohen,et al.  Pooling in two-location inventory systems with non-negligible replenishment lead times , 1992 .

[3]  George B. Dantzig,et al.  Linear Programming Under Uncertainty , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Design Principles for Effective Transshipment Networks , 2005 .

[5]  Seyed M. R. Iravani,et al.  Structural Flexibility: A New Perspective on the Design of Manufacturing and Service Operations , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Andrew E. B. Lim,et al.  Relative Entropy, Exponential Utility, and Robust Dynamic Pricing , 2007, Oper. Res..

[7]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  Process Flexibility in Supply Chains , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Giuseppe Carlo Calafiore,et al.  Uncertain convex programs: randomized solutions and confidence levels , 2005, Math. Program..

[9]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  Stochastic Programming : Convex Approximation and Modified Linear Decision Rule , 2005 .

[10]  Fikri Karaesmen,et al.  Characterizing the performance of process flexibility structures , 2007, Oper. Res. Lett..

[11]  Lawrence W. Robinson,et al.  Optimal and Approximate Policies in Multiperiod, Multilocation Inventory Models with Transshipments , 1990, Oper. Res..

[12]  Benjamin Van Roy,et al.  On Constraint Sampling in the Linear Programming Approach to Approximate Dynamic Programming , 2004, Math. Oper. Res..

[13]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Benefits of Skill Chaining in Production Lines with Cross-Trained Workers: An Extended Abstract , 2002, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[14]  Arkadi Nemirovski,et al.  Robust Convex Optimization , 1998, Math. Oper. Res..

[15]  William C. Jordan,et al.  Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility , 1995 .