Coated prostheses are associated with prolonged inflammation in aortic surgery: a cost analysis.

This prospective study was conducted to compare inflammatory responses between patients receiving coated and uncoated vascular prostheses, and to examine their effect on length of stay and cost of patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy. Patients undergoing elective vascular reconstruction of an abdominal aortic aneurysm were assigned randomly to coated-graft or uncoated-graft groups (n = 20, for each group). Interleukin (IL)-6, granulocyte elastase, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and body temperature (BT) were prospectively recorded preoperatively and on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, 7, and 14. In-hospital stay and hospitalized costs were also analyzed. IL-6 and CRP concentrations in the coated-graft group were higher than those in the uncoated-graft group (P = 0.01 and 0.05). BT was more frequently elevated >37 degrees C at POD 14 in the coated-graft group than in the uncoated-graft group (P =0.03). Discharge was delayed, and overall hospitalization cost was higher in the coated-graft group than in the uncoated group (17.6 vs. 13.5 days, and 2 010 000 vs. 1 780 000 yen, P = 0.006 and P = 0.002, respectively). Coated vascular prosthesis demonstrated more profound inflammatory reaction than noncoated prosthesis, postoperatively.

[1]  E. Buffolo,et al.  Coronary stenting and inflammation: implications for further surgical and medical treatment. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  M. Akbulut,et al.  Predictive Value of C-reactive Protein in Patients with Unstable Angina Pectoris Undergoing Coronary Artery Stent Implantation , 2005, The Journal of international medical research.

[3]  M. Schlosser,et al.  Antibody response to collagen after functional implantation of different polyester vascular prostheses in pigs. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[4]  H. Dauerman,et al.  Endothelial dysfunction and inflammation after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  S. Shindo,et al.  Vascular prosthetic implantation is associated with prolonged inflammation following aortic aneurysm surgery , 2003, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[6]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  Inflammatory response after intervention assessed by serial C-reactive protein measurements correlates with restenosis in patients treated with coronary stenting. , 2003, American heart journal.

[7]  T. Katogi,et al.  Hemashield implantation in young patients with congenital cardiovascular lesions. , 2000, Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

[8]  R. Muraoka,et al.  Postoperative inflammatory reactions of impregnated Dacron grafts , 1999, Surgery Today.

[9]  W. Lang,et al.  Knitted double-velour Dacron prostheses in aortobifemoral position--long-term performance of different coating materials. , 1998, VASA. Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten.

[10]  H. Noda,et al.  Increased Serum Interleukin-8: Correlation with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Postoperative Multiple Organ Failure , 1998, World Journal of Surgery.

[11]  N. Browse,et al.  Prospective randomized trial of woven versus collagen‐impregnated knitted prosthetic Dacron grafts in aortoiliac surgery , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[12]  Y. Hasegawa,et al.  Management of postoperative fever in cardiovascular surgery. , 1998, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  M. Hara,et al.  Postoperative inflammatory reactions to sealed Dracon prostheses: a comparison of Gelseal and Hemashield. , 1997, Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery.

[14]  G. Schlag,et al.  Mediators of Injury and Inflammation , 1996, World Journal of Surgery.

[15]  D. Charlesworth,et al.  Albumin-coated vascular prostheses: A five-year follow-up. , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  J. Wallwork,et al.  Clinical experience with a collagen impregnated woven Dacron graft. , 1995, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  A. Nevelsteen,et al.  Early inflammatory response to gelatin- and collagen-sealed Dacron prostheses , 1995, Annals of vascular surgery.

[18]  A. Matsumoto,et al.  Unusual inflammatory responses around a collagen-impregnated vascular prosthesis. , 1993, Artificial organs.

[19]  A. Haverich,et al.  Comparative in vivo study on the healing qualities of four different presealed vascular prostheses. , 1993, Journal of vascular surgery.

[20]  G. L’italien,et al.  A laboratory model to quantitate the resistance of collagen vascular grafts to biodegradation. , 1991, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  S. Holtås,et al.  Immune response to collagen impregnated Dacron double velour grafts for aortic and aorto-femoral reconstructions. , 1990, European journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  R Guidoin,et al.  Collagen coatings as biological sealants for textile arterial prostheses. , 1989, Biomaterials.

[23]  R. Jonas,et al.  A new sealant for knitted Dacron prostheses: minimally cross-linked gelatin. , 1988, Journal of vascular surgery.

[24]  S. Scott,et al.  A collagen coated vascular prosthesis. , 1987, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[25]  J. S. Clarke,et al.  Heat-denatured albumin-coated Dacron vascular grafts: physical characteristics and in vivo performance. , 1986, Journal of vascular surgery.

[26]  R. Guidoin,et al.  Albumin coating of a knitted polyester arterial prosthesis: an alternative to preclotting. , 1984, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[27]  R Guidoin,et al.  An albumin-coated polyester arterial graft: in vivo assessment of biocompatibility and healing characteristics. , 1996, Biomaterials.