Exploration of critical resources and capabilities of design firms for delivering green building projects: Empirical studies in Singapore

Abstract Green Building (GB) has attracted more attention in recent years and many studies have been conducted in project delivery of GB. In Singapore, the compulsory requirement of Green Mark, one certification for GB, drives the rapid development of GB Market. The purpose of this research is to identify the critical resources and capabilities of design firms that should be cultivated in order to help their projects achieve higher ratings of Green Mark effectively. Firstly, potential important organizational factors were explored through literature review. Then, these factors are ranked based on data collected in a questionnaire survey. “Experience and knowledge in GB”, “organizational green culture” “innovation capability” were found more important than other factors. Finally, the findings were tested by using a qualitative case study approach and two case companies in Singapore were investigated. The results of case studies not only validated the findings obtained from quantitative analysis, but also provided more in-depth additional reasons for the identified factors.

[1]  Hong-Tau Lee,et al.  Performance evaluation model for project managers using managerial practices , 2007 .

[2]  Wing-yan Thomas Man,et al.  Entrepreneurial competencies and the performance of small and medium enterprises in the Hong Kong services sector , 2001 .

[3]  Po-Han Chen,et al.  Critical Project Management Factors of AEC Firms for Delivering Green Building Projects in Singapore , 2011 .

[4]  Michael J. Garvin,et al.  An open framework for corporate strategy in construction , 2004 .

[5]  Zeynep Sözen Size, technology and aspects of structure in contractor firms in Turkey , 1985 .

[6]  Jorge A Vanegas,et al.  Road map and principles for built environment sustainability. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  BALANCING STRATEGY AND TACTICS IN PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION. , 1987 .

[8]  William G. Egelhoff Strategy and Structure in Multinational Corporations: An Information- Processing Approach , 1982 .

[9]  Yuen Jen Cheah Fundamental analysis and conceptual model for corporate strategy in global engineering and construction markets , 2002 .

[10]  J. Pinto,et al.  Critical factors in project implementation: a comparison of construction and R&D projects , 1989 .

[11]  Andrea Rangone,et al.  A Resource-Based Approach to Strategy Analysis in Small-Medium Sized Enterprises , 1999 .

[12]  David R. Riley,et al.  Lean Processes for Sustainable Project Delivery , 2006 .

[13]  Guo Zhi. Liu,et al.  International strategic management of chinese construction firms. , 2007 .

[14]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[15]  Grant K. Kululanga,et al.  Measuring knowledge management for construction organizations , 2001 .

[16]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[17]  Richard A. Swanson,et al.  HRD theory, real or imagined? , 1999 .

[18]  Jian. Kang,et al.  Strategic analysis of large local construction companies in China. , 2006 .

[19]  David R. Riley,et al.  Constructability Practices to Manage Sustainable Building Knowledge , 2006 .

[20]  Florence Yean Yng Ling,et al.  Framework for project managers to manage construction safety , 2005 .

[21]  David Rechenthin,et al.  Project safety as a sustainable competitive advantage. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[22]  Bon-Gang Hwang,et al.  Project management knowledge and skills for green construction: Overcoming challenges , 2013 .

[23]  Michael J. Horman,et al.  Key Processes in the Building Delivery of Green Hospitals , 2009 .

[24]  Christina M. Scott-Young,et al.  Project success and project team management: Evidence from capital projects in the process industries , 2008 .

[25]  Birger Wernerfelt,et al.  The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence , 1991 .

[26]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Effects of cooperative procurement procedures on construction project performance: A conceptual framework , 2011 .

[27]  David R. Riley,et al.  Piloting Evaluation Metrics for Sustainable High-Performance Building Project Delivery , 2010 .

[28]  J. Ford,et al.  Size, Technology, Environment and the Structure of Organizations , 1977 .

[29]  Xiaohua Lin,et al.  Organizational structure, context, customer orientation, and performance: lessons from Chinese state‐owned enterprises , 2003 .

[30]  M. T. Birgonul,et al.  Impact of corporate strengths/weaknesses on project management competencies , 2009 .