The Relationship between Ethical Sensitivity, High Ability and Gender in Higher Education Students

Abstract This study examined the ethical sensitivity of high-ability undergraduate students (n=731) in the Netherlands who completed the 28-item Ethical Sensitivity Scale Questionnaire (ESSQ) developed by Tirri & Nokelainen (2007; 2011). The ESSQ is based on Narvaez’ (2001) operationalization of ethical sensitivity in seven dimensions. The following research question was explored and subjected to a Mann-Whitney U Test: Are there any differences in ethical sensitivity between (1) academically average and high-ability students, and (2) male and female students? The self-assessed ethical sensitivity of high-ability students was higher than that of their average-ability peers. Furthermore, female students scored higher on ‘taking the perspectives of others’. These results imply that programs for high-ability students incorporating ethical issues could build upon characteristics of this group.

[1]  Laboratories for Educational Innovation: Honors Programs in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[2]  L. Silverman.  The moral sensitivity of gifted children and the evolution of society , 1994 .

[3]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  D. Narvaez.  High Achieving Students and Moral Judgment , 1993 .

[5]  M. Jacobsen.  Moral Leadership, Effective Leadership, and Intellectual Giftedness: Problems, Parallels, and Possibilities , 2009 .

[6]  K. Tirri.  Combining Excellence and Ethics: Implications for Moral Education for the Gifted , 2010 .

[7]  J. Helms,et al.  Treating Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficients as Data in Counseling Research , 2006 .

[8]  Kirsi Tirri,et al.  The Moral Concerns and Orientations of Sixth- and Ninth-Grade Students , 2003 .

[9]  Fredrik Björklund,et al.  Differences in the justification of choices in moral dilemmas: effects of gender, time pressure and dilemma seriousness. , 2003, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[10]  M. Roxas,et al.  The Importance of gender Across Cultures in Ethical Decision-making , 2004 .

[11]  Glyn M. Rimmington,et al.  Developing Global Awareness and Responsible World Citizenship With Global Learning , 2008 .

[12]  B. Tuckman.  Conducting Educational Research , 1972 .

[13]  A. Passow.  Educating Gifted Persons Who Are Caring and Concerned. , 1988 .

[14]  P. Nokelainen,et al.  Identification of multiple intelligences with the Multiple Intelligence Profiling Questionnaire III , 2008 .

[15]  P. Nokelainen,et al.  Role of motivation in the moral and religious judgment of mathematically gifted adolescents , 2010 .

[16]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. , 1999, Journal of Educational Psychology.

[17]  R. Engel,et al.  Innovations in Undergraduate Research and Honors Education Proceedings of the Second Schreyer National Conference , 2004 .

[18]  James R. Rest,et al.  Beyond the Promise: A Perspective on Research in Moral Education , 1999 .

[19]  An assessment of moral development in gifted adolescents , 1994 .

[20]  M. Keestra.  Vliegles voor de uil van Minerva? - Hoger onderwijs als voorbereiding op arbeidsmarkt en burgerschap , 2007 .

[21]  P. Nokelainen,et al.  Comparison of Academically Average and Gifted Students' Self-Rated Ethical Sensitivity , 2007 .

[22]  Mousa Alnabhan.  How does Moral Judgement Change with Age and Giftedness? , 2011 .

[23]  D. V. Lovecky.  Moral Sensitivity in Young Gifted Children , 2009 .

[24]  Gilman W. Whiting,et al.  Cultural Competence: Preparing Gifted Students for a Diverse Society , 2008 .

[25]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development , 2009 .

[26]  L. Drayer,et al.  Mission, Performance Indicators, and Assessment in U. S. Honors: A View from the Netherlands , 2012 .

[27]  P. Olszewski-Kubilius,et al.  The Civic Leadership Institute: A Service-Learning Program for Academically Gifted Youth , 2008 .

[28]  How Personality and Gender May Relate to Individual Attitudes Toward Caring for and About Others , 2009 .

[29]  Alice W. Terry,et al.  Service Learning: Fostering a Cycle of Caring in Our Gifted Youth , 2003 .

[30]  J. Plucker,et al.  We Recruit Them, But Then What? The Educational and Psychological Experiences of Academically Talented Undergraduates , 2004 .

[31]  Cheryl Achterberg,et al.  What is an Honors Student , 2005 .

[32]  Petri Nokelainen,et al.  Measuring Multiple Intelligences and Moral Sensitivities in Education , 2011 .

[33]  M. Matthews.  Leadership Education for Gifted and Talented Youth: A Review of the Literature , 2004 .

[34]  Daryl M. Guffey,et al.  Gender differences in determining the ethical sensitivity of future accounting professionals , 1996 .

[35]  P. Nokelainen,et al.  Relationship of gender and academic achievement to Finnish students’ intercultural sensitivity , 2009 .

[36]  P. Olszewski-Kubilius,et al.  The Emotional Intelligence, Moral Judgment, and Leadership of Academically Gifted Adolescents , 2006 .

[37]  C. Gilligan.  In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and of morality. , 1977 .

[38]  Barbara Clark,et al.  Growing up gifted : developing the potential of children at home and at school / Barbara Clark , 1979 .

[39]  Linda Jarvin,et al.  Explorations in Giftedness , 2010 .