Interventions to promote collaboration between nurses and doctors.

BACKGROUND Lack of nurse-doctor collaboration contributes to problems in quality and efficiency of patient care. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions designed to improve nurse-doctor collaboration. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group specialised register and database of studies awaiting assessment, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, MEDLINE, and reference lists of articles up to the end of October 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials, controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time series of interventions to improve collaboration between nursing and medical professionals sharing patient care in primary or hospital care settings. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS One reviewer assessed the eligibility of potentially relevant studies, extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies; a second reviewer undertook duplicate assessments on the eligibility of some articles and data abstraction on all included studies. MAIN RESULTS Two trials involving 1945 people were included. One six month trial involving 1102 admissions evaluated daily, structured, team ward rounds, in which nurses, doctors and other professionals made care decisions jointly. There was shortened average length of hospital stay (LOS) from 6.06 to 5.46 days, and reduced hospital charges from US$ 8090 to 6681. There were no differences in mortality rates or the type of care to which patients were discharged. Another three month trial involving 843 admissions compared two female wards and evaluated a four times per week round. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control wards in total average length of stay for all patients (11.7 days in intervention ward versus 11.6 in the control ward). Excluding patients who died in hospital revealed shortened length of stay in the intervention ward (intervention ward 10.5 days, control ward 11.9). Mortality rates were not significantly different. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS Increasing collaboration improved outcomes of importance to patients and to health care managers. These gains were moderate and affected health care processes rather than outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm these findings. The logistic challenge presented by the complexity of the interventions and the need for large sample sizes due to the likely modest impact and rarity of outcome events may best be met by multi-centre studies. Before launching such studies qualitative research is needed to identify barriers to collaboration. Interventions other than nurse-doctor ward rounds and team meetings should also be tested.

[1]  Y. Yodfat A new method of teamwork in family medicine in Israel with the participation of nurses as physician's assistants. , 1972, American journal of public health.

[2]  C. Taylor Rethinking nursing's basic competencies. , 1995, Journal of nursing care quality.

[3]  B. Engström A study of changes in the information routines in a neurological ward. , 1986, International journal of nursing studies.

[4]  L. Rubenstein,et al.  Organizing an academic nursing home. Impacts on institutionalized elderly. , 1986, JAMA.

[5]  J. Greenwell,et al.  Medicine and Nursing: Professions in a Changing Health Service. , 1994 .

[6]  B. Svarstad,et al.  The Impact of Regular Multidisciplinary Team Interventions on Psychotropic Prescribing in Swedish Nursing Homes , 1998, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[7]  D. Labarthe,et al.  The Mayo Three-Community Hypertension Control Program. I. Design and initial screening results. , 1979, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[8]  Haddock Ks Collaborative discharge planning: nursing and social services. , 1994 .

[9]  R. Salamonsen,et al.  Effectiveness of nursing involvement in bedside monitoring and control of coagulation status after cardiac surgery. , 1992, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[10]  C. Lightdale,et al.  Video endoscopy by nurse practitioners: a model for colorectal cancer screening. , 1988, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[11]  P. McGrath,et al.  Medical care by nurses in an internal medicine clinic. Analysis of quality and its cost. , 1975, JAMA.

[12]  P. Schultz,et al.  Primary Health Care Provided to the Elderly by a Nurse Practitioner/Physician Team: Analysis of Cost Effectiveness † , 1977, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[13]  Raphael Kaplinsky,et al.  Europe's Next Step: Organisational Innovation, Competition and Employment , 1995 .

[14]  J. Mayberry,et al.  Patients' Satisfaction Survey: A Review of In-Patient Attitudes Towards Care During a 12 Month Period , 1993, Journal of the Royal Society of Health.

[15]  D. Reuben,et al.  MODELS OF GERIATRIC PRACTICE: Progress Toward a Restraint‐Free Environment in a Large Academic Nursing Facility , 1995, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[16]  R. Fortinsky,et al.  A randomized trial of care in a hospital medical unit especially designed to improve the functional outcomes of acutely ill older patients. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  S. Inouye,et al.  A Controlled Trial of a Nursing‐Centered Intervention in Hospitalized Elderly Medical Patients: The Yale Geriatric Care Program , 1993, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  R. Jones Improving terminal care at home: can district nurses act as catalysts? , 1995, European journal of cancer care.