Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.

DNA evidence recovered from a scene or collected in relation to a case is generally declared as a mixture when more than two alleles are observed at several loci. However, in principle, all DNA profiles may be considered to be potentially mixtures, even those that show not more than two alleles at any locus. When using a likelihood ratio approach to the interpretation of mixed DNA profiles it is necessary to postulate the number of potential contributors. However, this number is never known with certainty. The possibility of a, say three-person mixture, presenting four or fewer peaks at each locus of the CODIS set was explored by Paoletti et al. [D.R. Paoletti, T.E. Doom, C.M. Krane, M.L. Raymer, D.E. Krane, Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures, J. Forensic Sci. 50 (2005) 1361-1366]. In this work we extend this analysis to consider the profiler plus and SGM plus multiplices. We begin the assessment of the risk associated with current practice in the calculation of LR's. We open the discussion of possible ways to surmount this ambiguity.

[1]  Carissa M Krane,et al.  Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  M. P. Baur,et al.  Likelihood ratios for mixed stains when the number of donors cannot be agreed , 2005, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[3]  Julia Mortera,et al.  Bounding the number of contributors to mixed DNA stains. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[4]  D. Balding Weight-of-Evidence for Forensic DNA Profiles , 2005 .

[5]  B. Weir,et al.  Interpreting DNA mixtures. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  P. Gill,et al.  PENDULUM--a guideline-based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[7]  J M Curran,et al.  Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  J Buckleton,et al.  Interpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak areas. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[9]  J A Lambert,et al.  Taking account of peak areas when interpreting mixed DNA profiles. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  J Buckleton,et al.  An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[11]  J. Buckleton,et al.  Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation , 2004 .

[12]  J. Whitaker,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling. , 1998, Forensic science international.