Conservation in insular parks: Simulation models of factors affecting the movement of animals across park boundaries

Abstract Many parks represent insular areas of habitat and the movement of animals across park boundaries can be critical to park wildlife populations. I use computer simulation models in order to analyse factors affecting the movement and density of animals in patches of habitat (Buechner, 1987b; Stamps et al. , 1987; in press). The results suggest that the perimeter: area ratios and edge permeability of parks, the appearance and stopping patterns and habitat preferences of moving animals, and the relative size of dispersal sinks and source pools can all potentially influence the direction and magnitude of the movement of animals across the park boundaries. The results suggest that scientists interested in park and reserve design n to consider other factors than just the size of potential sites, particularly park perimeter: area ratios. The simulations also suggests a strategy for solving some types of conservation and control problems by manipulating sinks or pools: (1) identify which factors can be practically altered in a given situation, (2) evaluate those factors to estimate their current levels, and (3) focus on the factor which is nearest the lower end of its range of values.

[1]  C. Schonewald-Cox,et al.  The boundary model: A geographical analysis of design and conservation of nature reserves , 1986 .

[2]  E. Connor,et al.  Is there a best shape for nature reserves , 1985 .

[3]  Margaret Game,et al.  Best shape for nature reserves , 1980, Nature.

[4]  D. Simberloff,et al.  What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves , 1986 .

[5]  Carolyn Harrison,et al.  The Archipelago Approach to Conservation: Inspiring but Unproven@@@The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. , 1984 .

[6]  C. Margules,et al.  Modern biogeographic theory: Are there any lessons for nature reserve design? , 1982 .

[7]  M. Buechner.  A Geometric Model of Vertebrate Dispersal: Tests and Implications , 1987 .

[8]  David S. Wilcove,et al.  Nest Predation in Forest Tracts and the Decline of Migratory Songbirds , 1985 .

[9]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  The Effects of Edge Permeability and Habitat Geometry on Emigration from Patches of Habitat , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[10]  Wildlife and the National Park Service , 1987 .

[11]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  The Effects of Habitat Geometry on Territorial Defense Costs: Intruder Pressure in Bounded Habitats , 1987 .

[12]  H. G. Cumming,et al.  Wildlife Ecology and Management , 1985 .

[13]  C. S. Robbins,et al.  Effects of forest fragmentation on avifauna of the eastern deciduous forest , 1981 .

[14]  M. Shaffer.  Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation , 1981 .

[15]  J. Hestbeck.  Population Regulation of Cyclic Mammals: The Social Fence Hypothesis , 1982 .

[16]  Daniel H. Janzen,et al.  No Park Is an Island: Increase in Interference from Outside as Park Size Decreases , 1983 .

[17]  P. White,et al.  After preservation: Philisophical and practical problems of change☆ , 1980 .

[18]  Paul Opdam,et al.  Bird communities in small woods in an agricultural landscape: Effects of area and isolation , 1984 .

[19]  W. Newmark,et al.  Legal and biotic boundaries of western North American national parks: A problem of congruence , 1985 .