Electric vehicle drivers' reported interactions with the public: Driving stereotype change?

Image and symbolic meanings of cars play a key role in their desirability and in consumers’ purchasing behaviour. Drivers in the United Kingdom Technology Strategy Board funded Ultra Low Carbon Vehicle trial were interviewed regarding their interactions with the general (non-EV driving) public. EV drivers’ accounts suggest that EVs are particularly susceptible to stereotyping, but that the stereotyping is in a state of flux. Three different categories of meaning emerged. A Traditional, affective-based negative stereotype exists, despite reflecting outdated associations with milk floats and older EV models. However, the current period of widespread EV trialling in the UK sees the emergence of additional EV stereotypes. Drivers encountered categories of meaning that were Ambivalent: cognitively-based, ambivalence showed people to hold negative views and reservations but also to reveal a willingness to assess the current capabilities of EVs. Finally, drivers encountered people holding Positive meanings of EVs. Greater contact with drivers of contemporary EVs helped to develop these further. Based on a combination of affect, cognition and behaviour, it shows a segment of non-EV drivers to be engaged with the new technology and to see EVs as well developed now and also as cars of the future. We discuss the key factors underpinning each of the categories of meaning and indicate the ramifications for the likely future success of EV uptake.

[1]  R. Elliott,et al.  Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. , 1999, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[2]  Linda Steg,et al.  INSTRUMENTAL-REASONED AND SYMBOLIC-AFFECTIVE MOTIVES FOR USING A MOTOR CAR , 2001 .

[3]  A. Giorgi,et al.  A Qualitative Effort to Describe Experience Scientifically Review ofThe descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach , 2009, History & Philosophy of Psychology.

[4]  John C. Turner,et al.  Stereotyping and Social Reality , 1994 .

[5]  Joseph J. Corn,et al.  Taking the Wheel: Women and the Coming of the Motor Age , 1991 .

[6]  Charles Abraham,et al.  Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: A qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations , 2012 .

[7]  Thomas S Turrentine,et al.  Effects of Vehicle Image in Gasoline-Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2005 .

[8]  Jillian Anable,et al.  An evidence-based review of public attitudes to climate change and transport behaviour - final report , 2006 .

[9]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[10]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[11]  Thomas S Turrentine,et al.  Symbolism and the Adoption of Fuel-Cell Vehicles , 2007 .

[12]  Linda Steg,et al.  Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use , 2005 .

[13]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Testing Electric Vehicle Demand in `Hybrid Households' Using a Reflexive Survey , 1996 .

[14]  Ilan Salomon,et al.  Why did the chicken cross the road, and what's funny about it? The role of transportation cartoons in social experiences , 2011 .

[15]  Thomas S Turrentine,et al.  Driving Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Reports from U.S. Drivers of HEVs converted to PHEVs, circa 2006-07 , 2008 .

[16]  R. Yin Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[17]  Reid R. Heffner,et al.  Symbolism in California’s Early Market for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007 .

[18]  Jonathan A. Smith Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods , 2006, QMiP Bulletin.

[19]  Don R Scott,et al.  The self‐concept and image congruence hypothesis , 1998 .

[20]  I. Parker Qualitative Psychology: Introducing Radical Research , 2004 .

[21]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Going Green to Be Seen : Status , Reputation , and Conspicuous Conservation , 2010 .

[22]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[23]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: A discrete-choice stated preference pilot project , 1993 .

[24]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Interpersonal Influence within Car Buyers' Social Networks: Applying Five Perspectives to Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle Drivers , 2012 .

[25]  S. Potter,et al.  The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: exploring the consumer attitude–action gap , 2007 .

[26]  Saalem Sadeque,et al.  Why do people buy hybrid cars , 2010 .

[27]  Steven E. Sexton,et al.  Conspicuous conservation: The Prius halo and willingness to pay for environmental bona fides , 2014 .

[28]  Tom Wengraf Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods , 2001 .

[29]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[30]  Mikael Hård,et al.  Cultural Politics in Action: Developing User Scripts in Relation to the Electric Vehicle , 2002 .

[31]  Bradley Flamm,et al.  Constraints to green vehicle ownership: A focus group study , 2012 .

[32]  Stephen Skippon,et al.  Responses to battery electric vehicles: UK consumer attitudes and attributions of symbolic meaning following direct experience to reduce psychological distance , 2011 .

[33]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Interpretative phenomenological analysis. , 2008, Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (2nd ed.)..

[34]  E. Grubb,et al.  Perception of Self, Generalized Stereotypes, and Brand Selection , 1968 .

[35]  M. Pierre,et al.  Driving an electric vehicle. A sociological analysis on pioneer users , 2011 .

[36]  J. Anable,et al.  AN EVIDENCE BASE REVIEW OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES TO CLIMATE CHANGE AND TRANSPORT BEHAVIOUR , 2006 .

[37]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[38]  H. Tajfel Social stereotypes and social groups. , 2001 .