Domain-specific market segmentation using a latent class mixture modelling approach and wine-related lifestyle (WRL) algorithm

Purpose Since the publication of Van Raaij and Verhallen’s seminal work in European Journal of Marketing in 1994, identifying the domain-specific market segmentation approach as one of the most feasible for segmenting markets, there has been surprisingly limited development in this field, with the food domain as the only exception. This study aims to develop a methodological approach using latent class mixture modelling as contribution in the domain-specific market segmentation field. Design/methodology/approach This study captures the AIO lifestyle perspective using a domain-specific 80-item algorithm which has the wine (product) domain as its focus. A sample size of 811 consumers is used from data collected by means of the CATI approach. Findings The authors use four criteria for model selection: comparison of the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) statistic, comparison of classification error, verification of the interpretation of the derived segments and, finally, use of the conditional bootstrap procedure to test whether the selected model provides a significant improvement over the previous model. The five-segment model option yields a minimum BIC, the classification error measure is minimal and is easier to interpret than the other models. Segment descriptions for the five identified lifestyle-based segments are developed. Research limitations/implications Segmentation by traditional k-means clustering has proven to be less useful than the more innovative alternative of mixture regression modelling; therefore, the authors identify segments in the market on the basis of individuals’ domain-specific lifestyle characteristics using a latent class mixture modelling approach. Practical implications Following the attainment of a clear and robust market segmentation structure, the simultaneous analysis of the lifestyles, demographics and behaviours of consumers as nexus of the domain-specific segmentation approach, provides rich and valid information accurately informing the market segment descriptions. Originality/value The authors make a substantive contribution by developing a methodological approach using latent class mixture modelling; the first of its kind in the area of domain-specific segmentation. Next, they use the discriminant and/or predictive validity of the 80-scale items to predict cluster membership using the WRL algorithm. Finally, the authors describe the identified market segments in detail and outline the practical implications.

[1]  Susan H. C. Tai,et al.  Research note:The psychographic segmentation of the female market in Greater China , 1998 .

[2]  L. Kahle,et al.  Food-Related Lifestyle: Development of a Cross-Culturally Valid Instrument for Market Surveillance , 2014 .

[3]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Concomitant Variable Latent Class Models for Conjoint Analysis , 1994 .

[4]  Paurav Shukla,et al.  The moderating influence of socio‐demographic factors on the relationship between consumer psychographics and the attitude towards private label brands , 2013 .

[5]  David Bennison,et al.  Making sense of market segmentation: a fashion retailing case , 2007 .

[6]  S. Sands,et al.  Segmenting consumer reactions to social network marketing , 2014 .

[7]  H. Bozdogan Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions , 1987 .

[8]  Natalie Mizik,et al.  Modeling coexisting business scenarios with time-series panel data: A dynamics-based segmentation approach , 2012 .

[9]  W. F. V. Raaij,et al.  Domain‐specific Market Segmentation , 1994 .

[10]  Jaehoon Lee,et al.  Ignoring Clustering in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Some Consequences for Model Fit and Standardized Parameter Estimates , 2014, Multivariate behavioral research.

[11]  Cheng-Hsi Fang,et al.  Food-Related Lifestyle Segments in Taiwan: Application of the Food-Related Lifestyle Instrument , 2009 .

[12]  Wendell R. Smith Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing Strategies , 1956 .

[13]  J. Bruwer,et al.  An Empirical Confirmation of Wine‐Related Lifestyle Segments in the Australian Wine Market , 2003 .

[14]  M. Uncles,et al.  A taxonomy of differences between consumers for market segmentation , 2002 .

[15]  John Roberts,et al.  From academic research to marketing practice: Exploring the marketing science value chain , 2014, How to Get Published in the Best Marketing Journals.

[16]  Friedrich Leisch,et al.  Evaluation of structure and reproducibility of cluster solutions using the bootstrap , 2010 .

[17]  S. Hunt,et al.  Market Segmentation Strategy, Competitive Advantage, and Public Policy: Grounding Segmentation Strategy in Resource-Advantage Theory , 2004 .

[18]  Sally Galbraith,et al.  A Study of Clustered Data and Approaches to Its Analysis , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Latent class metric conjoint analysis , 1992 .

[20]  Bettina Grün,et al.  Increasing sample size compensates for data problems in segmentation studies , 2016 .

[21]  Qun Liu,et al.  Comparison of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in selection of stock–recruitment relationships , 2006 .

[22]  Taehyun Kim,et al.  External validity of market segmentation methods , 2011 .

[23]  Ana María Magaz González,et al.  The construct “lifestyle” in market segmentation , 2002 .

[24]  Leigh Morris,et al.  A class of its own: latent class segmentation and its implications for qualitative segmentation research , 2003 .

[25]  J. Bruwer,et al.  Wine-Related Lifestyle (WRL) Market Segmentation: Demographic and Behavioural Factors , 2007 .

[26]  K. Grunert,et al.  Cross-cultural validity of the food-related lifestyles instrument (FRL) within Western Europe , 2004, Appetite.

[27]  Hai Hu,et al.  Application of Linear Discriminant Analysis in Dimensionality Reduction for Hand Motion Classification , 2012 .

[28]  T. Powers,et al.  Generation Y values and lifestyle segments , 2013 .

[29]  Sara Dolnicar,et al.  Beyond “Commonsense Segmentation”: A Systematics of Segmentation Approaches in Tourism , 2004 .

[30]  Chin‐Feng Lin,et al.  Segmenting customer brand preference: demographic or psychographic , 2002 .

[31]  Bettina Grün,et al.  Required Sample Sizes for Data-Driven Market Segmentation Analyses in Tourism , 2014 .

[32]  P. Vyncke Lifestyle Segmentation , 2002 .

[33]  M. Wedel,et al.  A fuzzy clusterwise regression approach to benefit segmentation , 1989 .

[34]  C. Chi,et al.  Examining the structural relationships of destination image, tourist satisfaction and destination loyalty: An integrated approach , 2008 .

[35]  Rizal Ahmad Benefit segmentation: a potentially useful technique of segmenting and targeting older consumers , 2003 .

[36]  Eva Martínez,et al.  The effect of consumer's psychographic variables upon deal-proneness , 2006 .

[37]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Is food-related lifestyle (FRL) able to reveal food consumption patterns in non-Western cultural environments? Its adaptation and application in urban China , 2011, Appetite.

[38]  Amit Bhatnagar,et al.  A latent class segmentation analysis of e-shoppers , 2004 .

[39]  J. Bruwer,et al.  Segmentation of the Australian Wine Market Using a Wine-Related Lifestyle Approach , 2002 .

[40]  Robin Wensley,et al.  Marketing knowledge and the value of segmentation , 2002 .

[41]  Bettina Grün,et al.  Challenging “Factor–Cluster Segmentation” , 2008, Journal of Travel Research.