The effect of visual display properties and gain presentation mode on the perceived naturalness of virtual walking speeds

Individuals tend to find realistic walking speeds too slow when relying on treadmill walking or Walking-In-Place (WIP) techniques for virtual travel. This paper details three studies investigating the effects of visual display properties and gain presentation mode on the perceived naturalness of virtual walking speeds: The first study compared three different degrees of peripheral occlusion; the second study compared three different degrees of perceptual distortion produced by varying the geometric field of view (GFOV); and the third study compared three different ways of presenting visual gains. All three studies compared treadmill walking and WIP locomotion. The first study revealed no significant main effects of peripheral occlusion. The second study revealed a significant main effect of GFOV, suggesting that the GFOV size may be inversely proportional to the degree of underestimation of the visual speed. The third study found a significant main effect of gain presentation mode. Allowing participants to interactively adjust the gain led to a smaller range of perceptually natural gains and this approach was significantly faster. However, the efficiency may come at the expense of confidence. Generally the lower and upper bounds of the perceptually natural speeds were higher for treadmill walking than WIP. However, not all differences were statistically significant.

[1]  Klaus H. Hinrichs,et al.  Natural Perspective Projections for Head-Mounted Displays , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[2]  Stefania Serafin,et al.  Establishing the Range of Perceptually Natural Visual Walking Speeds for Virtual Walking-In-Place Locomotion , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  W. Ehrenstein,et al.  Psychophysical Methods , 1999 .

[4]  Frank Steinicke,et al.  Human Walking in Virtual Environments: Perception, Technology, and Applications , 2013 .

[5]  Franck Multon,et al.  Human Walking in Virtual Environments: perception, technology and applications , 2013 .

[6]  Julian Williams,et al.  The implementation of a novel walking interface within an immersive display , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[7]  Stefania Serafin,et al.  The Perceived Naturalness of Virtual Locomotion Methods Devoid of Explicit Leg Movements , 2013, MIG.

[8]  Betsy Williams Sanders,et al.  Evaluation of walking in place on a Wii balance board to explore a virtual environment , 2011, TAP.

[9]  Andrew Parkes,et al.  Geometric field of view manipulations affect perceived speed in driving simulators , 2009 .

[10]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[11]  B. Stevens,et al.  Blurring the boundaries: the perception of visual gain in treadmill-mediated virtual environments , 2011 .

[12]  Betty J. Mohler,et al.  Calibration of locomotion resulting from visual motion in a treadmill-based virtual environment , 2007, TAP.

[13]  Ronald R. Mourant,et al.  Optic flow and geometric field of view in a driving simulator display , 2007, Displays.

[14]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Stepping-Driven Locomotion Interfaces , 2013 .

[15]  Thomas Banton,et al.  The Perception of Walking Speed in a Virtual Environment , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[16]  Gerd Bruder,et al.  Estimation of Detection Thresholds for Redirected Walking Techniques , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[17]  G. Gescheider.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[18]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  GUD WIP: Gait-Understanding-Driven Walking-In-Place , 2010, 2010 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR).

[19]  Stefania Serafin,et al.  Participatory Amplitude Level Adjustment of Gesture Controlled Upper Body Garment Sound in Immersive Virtual Reality , 2014 .

[20]  Joaquim A. Jorge,et al.  A New Approach to Walking in Place , 2013, INTERACT.

[21]  Mel Slater,et al.  Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality , 1995, TCHI.

[22]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Matching actual treadmill walking speed and visually perceived walking speed in a projection virtual environment , 2010, APGV '10.

[23]  N. Prins.  Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction , 2009 .

[24]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  LLCM-WIP: Low-Latency, Continuous-Motion Walking-in-Place , 2008, 2008 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces.

[25]  Mel Slater,et al.  Steps and ladders in virtual reality , 1994 .

[26]  Eric D. Ragan,et al.  Questioning naturalism in 3D user interfaces , 2012, CACM.

[27]  Stefania Serafin,et al.  Tapping-In-Place: Increasing the naturalness of immersive walking-in-place locomotion through novel gestural input , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[28]  William B. Thompson,et al.  HMD calibration and its effects on distance judgments , 2008, APGV '08.

[29]  J. Edward Swan,et al.  Peripheral Stimulation and its Effect on Perceived Spatial Scale in Virtual Environments , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[30]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  The perception of linear self-motion , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[31]  Francis K. H. Quek,et al.  Sensor-fusion walking-in-place interaction technique using mobile devices , 2012, 2012 IEEE Virtual Reality Workshops (VRW).

[32]  Krista M. Gigone,et al.  Perception of visual speed while moving. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Adar Pelah,et al.  Reduction of perceived visual speed during walking: Effect dependent upon stimulus similarity to the visual consequences of locomotion , 2010 .

[34]  T. Oberg,et al.  Basic gait parameters: reference data for normal subjects, 10-79 years of age. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.