With each new technology node, the corresponding overlay requirements become tighter. It has been shown that differences can exist between the pattern placement error of the relatively large frame in frame type overlay structures typically used for overlay measurement and control and real device structures. These differences can become a significant part of the total overlay budget. It is therefore necessary to identify the magnitude of these differences and establish whether they can be corrected. In order to investigate these differences in pattern placement error, an alternative metrology technique needed to be established which was capable of measuring the overlay of real device structures. In the first part of this paper we show that CD SEM Overlay Metrology offers comparable precision to that of the more traditional measurement of large frame in frame type overlay structures on an optical overlay tool. In the second part of the paper we apply this metrology technique to evaluate the pattern placement errors across the field of a step and scan exposure tool for different illumination modes. This is then compared to that obtained using the more traditional optical overlay metrology technique. Finally we discuss how these differences can be handled in a production environment in order to obtain optimum overlay performance.
[1]
Harry J. Levinson,et al.
Overlay accuracy in 0.18-μm copper dual-damascene process
,
2002,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[2]
Alberto Luci,et al.
Optimization of overlay markers to limit the measurement error induced during exposure by lens aberration effects
,
2002,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[3]
Richard J. F. van Haren,et al.
Advances in process overlay: ATHENA alignment system performance on critical process layers
,
2002,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[4]
Timothy A. Brunner,et al.
Impact of lens aberrations on optical lithography
,
1997,
IBM J. Res. Dev..