Impacts of International Wheat Breeding Research in the Developing World, 1988-2002

The third in a series of global studies, this report (covering 1988-2002) documents the adoption and diffusion of modern wheat varieties in the developing world and assesses the benefi ts generated by international wheat breeding efforts. It updates the fi ndings and confi rms the three major conclusions of the two earlier studies, and extends the coverage to include many countries in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. In the postGreen Revolution era, CIMMYT’s improved germplasm continues to be used extensively by breeding programs in developing countries, and public investment in international wheat breeding research continues to generate high rates of return. Measured in terms of varietal releases, wheat breeding programs in developing countries continue to be very productive. Between 1988 and 2002, public national research organizations and private seed companies in the developing world released nearly 1,700 wheat varieties. The international wheat breeding system continues to be dominated by public breeding programs, but private companies also engage in wheat breeding in a number of developing countries. More than 75% of protected cultivars (those with plant breeding rights) in South America have CIMMYT ancestry. Of the area planted to wheat in the surveyed countries, 64% was sown to varieties containing CIMMYT-related germplasm, and 24% of varieties in those countries were derived from CIMMYT crosses. A simple economic surplus model was used to estimate the value of additional grain production attributable to the adoption of modern wheat varieties in developing countries. Depending on the stringency of the method used, the value of additional grain ranges from US$ 2.0 to 6.1 billion per year (2002 dollars). The extensive use of CIMMYT germplasm by public and private breeding programs, combined with the widespread adoption of CIMMYT-derived varieties, generates signifi cant benefi ts. Using the most conservative rule for attributing credit to CIMMYT (CIMMYT cross), the annual benefi ts associated with the use of CIMMYT-derived germplasm range from US$ 0.5 to 1.5 billion (2002 dollars), a huge return on CIMMYT’s annual investment (US$ 9-11 million in 2002 dollars) in wheat improvement research.

[1]  Michael L. Morris,et al.  Impacts of international maize breeding research in developing countries, 1966-98 , 2002 .

[2]  M. Rosegrant,et al.  The economic consequences of crop genetic improvement programmes. , 2003 .

[3]  R. Sears,et al.  Genetic Improvement in Agronomic Traits of Hard Red Winter Wheat Cultivars 1919 to 1987 , 1988 .

[4]  C. Thirtle,et al.  PUBLIC SECTOR PLANT BREEDING IN A PRIVATIZING WORLD , 2001 .

[5]  J. Crossa,et al.  Relationships among Bread Wheat International Yield Testing Locations in Dry Areas , 2001 .

[6]  R. Evenson,et al.  Assessing the Impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000 , 2003, Science.

[7]  J. Ransom,et al.  Improvement in the Yield Potential of Bread Wheat Adapted to Northwest Mexico 1 , 1986 .

[8]  P. Heisey,et al.  International wheat breeding research in Eastern and Southern Africa, 1966-97 , 2000 .

[9]  P. Pingali.  CIMMYT 1998-99 World wheat facts and trends. Global wheat research in a changing World: Challenges and Achievements , 1999 .

[10]  T. Payne,et al.  Associations among Twenty Years of International Bread Wheat Yield Evaluation Environments , 2003 .

[11]  M. Morris,et al.  Estimating the benefits of plant breeding research: methodological issues and practical challenges , 2003 .

[12]  M. Smale,et al.  Sources of Productivity Growth in Wheat: A Review of Recent Performance and Medium- to Long-Term Prospects , 1999 .

[13]  M. Morris,et al.  Returns to wheat research in Nepal , 1992 .

[14]  D. Lill,et al.  Directions in breeding for winter wheat yield and quality in South Africa from 1930 to 1990 , 2004, Euphytica.

[15]  David Hoisington,et al.  SSR and pedigree analyses of genetic diversity among CIMMYT wheat lines targeted to different megaenvironments , 2004 .

[16]  S. Dreisigacker,et al.  Bringing wild relatives back into the family: recovering genetic diversity in CIMMYT improved wheat germplasm , 2006, Euphytica.

[17]  Derek Byerlee,et al.  Economic efficiency of small farmers in a changing world: A survey of recent evidence , 1991 .

[18]  P. Döll,et al.  A Digital Global Map of Irrigated Areas An Update for Latin America and Europe , 2001 .

[19]  Mywish K. Maredia,et al.  The global wheat improvement system : prospects for enhancing efficiency in the presence of spillovers , 1999 .

[20]  J. Reif,et al.  Wheat genetic diversity trends during domestication and breeding , 2005, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[21]  P. Heisey.  Accelerating the transfer of wheat breeding gains to farmers : a study of the dynamics of varietal replacement in Pakistan , 1990 .

[22]  M. L. Morris,et al.  Impacts of international maize breeding research in the developing world, 1966-1990 , 1994 .

[23]  H. K. Jain,et al.  Eighty years of wheat breeding in India: past selection pressures and future prospects , 1982 .

[24]  J. Chavas,et al.  A Nonparametric Analysis of the Influence of Research on Agricultural Productivity , 1992 .

[25]  R. B. Austin,et al.  Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes , 1980, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[26]  R. Tomasini.  Impact of Mexican germplasm on Brazilian wheat cropping: an ex-post economic analysis , 2002 .

[27]  P. Wall,et al.  Wheat breeding in Mexico and yield increases , 1976 .

[28]  Prabhu Pingali,et al.  Is research on marginal lands catching up? The case of unfavourable wheat growing environments* , 2003 .

[29]  D. Byerlee.  Technical change and returns to wheat breeding research in Pakistan's Punjab in the post-green revolution period , 1993 .

[30]  Maximina A. Lantican,et al.  Impacts of international wheat breeding research in developing countries, 1966-97 , 2002 .

[31]  M. Perry,et al.  Yield improvement and associated characteristics of some Australian spring wheat cultivars introduced between 1860 and 1982 , 1989 .

[32]  P. Pardey,et al.  Causal Relationships between Public Sector Agricultural Research Expenditures and Output , 1989 .

[33]  J. Ledent,et al.  Yield of Winter-wheat, a Comparison of Genotypes From 1910 To 1976 , 1988 .

[34]  Derek Byerlee,et al.  Technical change, productivity and sustainability in irrigated cropping systems of South Asia: Emerging issues in the post-green revolution era , 1992 .

[35]  D. Byerlee,et al.  National and International Wheat Improvement Research in the Post-Green Revolution Period: Evolution and Impacts , 1995 .

[36]  W. Pfeiffer,et al.  Environments for selecting widely adapted spring wheat , 1992 .

[37]  J. Crossa,et al.  Relationships among international testing sites of spring durum wheat , 1996 .

[38]  John W. Schmidt.  Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains in Wheat , 2015 .

[39]  M. Ginkel,et al.  CIMMYT's approach to breeding for wide adaptation , 1996 .

[40]  G. Slafer,et al.  Genetic improvement in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield in Argentina , 1989 .

[41]  G. M. Paulsen,et al.  Contribution of Genetic Improvement to Recent Wheat Yield Increases in the USA1 , 1984 .

[42]  Scott C. Chapman,et al.  Using simulation models and spatial databases to improve the efficiency of plant breeding programs. , 1996 .

[43]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  Attribution and other problems in assessing the returns to agricultural R&D , 2001 .

[44]  R. A. Fischer,et al.  Yield potential progress in short bread wheats in Northwest Mexico , 1997 .

[45]  M. Ginkel,et al.  Progress in breeding wheat for yield and adaptation in global drought affected environments , 2002 .

[46]  Prabhu Pingali,et al.  Cereal Crop Productivity in Developing Countries: Past Trends and Future Prospects , 1999 .

[47]  G. Marshall,et al.  Issues in benefit-cost analysis of agricultural research projects , 2001 .