Real Experiences of uHTS: A Prototypic 1536-Well Fluorescence Anisotropy-Based uHTS Screen and Application of Well-Level Quality Control Procedures

This paper describes, for the first time, a true ultra-high throughput screen (uHTS) based upon fluorescence anisotropy and performed entirely in 1536-well assay plates. The assay is based upon binding and displacement of a BODIPY-FL-labeled antibiotic to a specific binding site on 70S ribosomes from Escherichia coli (Kd 15 nM). The screen was performed at uHTS rates (i.e., >100,000 assay wells/24 h) using entirely commercially available equipment. In order to examine the reproducibility of detection of test compound effects, assays were performed in duplicate. Both overall assay statistics and reproducibility for individual compound results were excellent, at least equivalent to conventional HTS assays. Interference artifacts occurred mainly as a result of autofluorescence from test compounds. Well-level quality control procedures were developed to detect, eliminate, or even correct for such effects. Moreover, development of a brighter, longer wavelength probe (based upon Cy3B) markedly reduced such interferences. Overall, the data demonstrate that fluorescence anisotropy-based uHTS is now a practical reality.

[1]  U. Haupts,et al.  Single-Molecule Detection Technologies in Miniaturized High Throughput Screening: Binding Assays for G Protein-Coupled Receptors Using Fluorescence Intensity Distribution Analysis and Fluorescence Anisotropy , 2001, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[2]  J. Owicki,et al.  Fluorescence Polarization and Anisotropy in High Throughput Screening: Perspectives and Primer , 2000, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[3]  P. Banks,et al.  Impact of a Red-Shifted Dye Label for High Throughput Fluorescence Polarization Assays of G Protein-Coupled Receptors , 2000, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[4]  R. Hertzberg,et al.  High-throughput screening: new technology for the 21st century. , 2000, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[5]  J. Sportsman,et al.  Miniaturization of homogeneous assays using fluorescence polarization , 2000 .

[6]  U. Haupts,et al.  Macroscopic versus microscopic fluorescence techniques in (ultra)-high-throughput screening , 2000 .

[7]  Daniel Chelsky,et al.  Miniaturizing screening: how low can we go today? , 2000 .

[8]  Stephen Ashman,et al.  Single Molecule Detection Technologies in Miniaturized High Throughput Screening: Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy , 1999, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[9]  D. Earnshaw,et al.  Time-Resolved Fluorescence Energy Transfer DNA Helicase Assays for High Throughput Screening , 1999, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[10]  Peter J. Coassin,et al.  Miniaturized FRET assays and microfluidics: key components for ultra-high-throughput screening. , 1999, Drug discovery today.

[11]  A. Pope,et al.  A Homogenous 384-Well High Throughput Screen for Novel Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor: Ligand Interactions Using Time Resolved Energy Transfer , 1999, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[12]  U. Haupts,et al.  Homogeneous fluorescence readouts for miniaturized high-throughput screening: theory and practice. , 1999, Drug discovery today.

[13]  Thomas D. Y. Chung,et al.  A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays , 1999, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[14]  J J Burbaum,et al.  New technologies for high-throughput screening. , 1997, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[15]  John P. Devlin,et al.  High Throughput Screening: The Discovery of Bioactive Substances , 1997 .

[16]  E. S. Pearson Biometrika tables for statisticians , 1967 .