Graft survival and risk factors of penetrating keratoplasty for microbial keratitis.

PURPOSE To evaluate graft survival rates and prognostic factors in relation to penetrating keratoplasty for microbial keratitis. METHODS The records of 95 patients treated with penetrating keratoplasty for microbial keratitis during a twenty-year period were reviewed. Data were analysed by construction of survival curves using the Kaplan-Meier non parametric method. RESULTS The overall survival of a clear cornea was 72% after one year, 71% after two years and 52% after five years. A significantly lower survival rate (p<0.05) was found in the presence of preoperative local risk factors such as wear of contact lenses and trauma and in inflamed eyes. In contrast, systemic diseases like diabetes, cancer or rheumatoid arthritis did not affect survival and neither did recipient age nor the degree of vascularization of the eye. Male donor buttons showed superior survival compared to female ones (p < 0.05), while females seemed to constitute the best recipients. Recurrence rates of microbial keratitis postoperatively were 11%, 16% and 24% after one, two and five years, respectively. Corresponding graft rejection rates were 9%, 15% and 27%. CONCLUSIONS Patients suffering from microbial keratitis have a relatively high risk of graft failure. To improve the prognosis care should be taken to minimize local risk factors. Surgery should whenever possible be performed on quiet eyes. The unexpected finding of a better prognosis for male donor buttons might suggest the preferred use of male donors in patients suffering from microbial keratitis, but the observation needs further documentation.

[1]  N. Ehlers,et al.  Recurrence and rejection rates following corneal transplantation for herpes simplex keratitis. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[2]  A. Pavie,et al.  Donor factors influencing organ transplant prognosis. , 1995, Transplantation proceedings.

[3]  G. Stern,et al.  Results of therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[4]  A. Steele,et al.  The role of penetrating keratoplasty in the management of microbial keratitis , 1991, Eye.

[5]  R. E. Smith,et al.  Results of penetrating keratoplasty for the treatment of corneal perforations. , 1990, Archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  A. Steele,et al.  Microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty , 1990, Eye.

[7]  P. Laughrea,et al.  Effect of factors unrelated to tissue matching on corneal transplant endothelial rejection. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  N. Ehlers,et al.  Exogenous, ocular, and systemic factors associated with keratitic ulceration , 1989, Acta ophthalmologica.

[9]  C. Foster,et al.  Microbial keratitis complicating penetrating keratoplasty. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[10]  H. Völker‐Dieben,et al.  Hierarchy of prognostic factors for corneal allograft survival. , 1987, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  J. Hill Use of penetrating keratoplasty in acute bacterial keratitis. , 1986, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  N. Ehlers,et al.  Corneal transplantation using long‐term cultured donor material , 1986, Acta ophthalmologica.

[13]  T. Olsen,et al.  FRESH AND CULTURED CORNEAL GRAFTS COMPARED BY POST‐OPERATIVE THICKNESS AND ENDOTHELIAL CELL DENSITY , 1981, Acta ophthalmologica.

[14]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .