A Photovoltaic System Investment Game for Assessing Network Hosting Capacity Allocations

The rapid rise of PV installations in low-voltage (LV) distribution networks means that they are likely to exceed network hosting capacity. For this reason, distribution network service providers (DNSP) have begun to mandate connection codes, such as inverter Volt/Var control and/or PV active power curtailment, to mitigate the resulting network problems. This approach manages the network state, but may cause an existing PV system to become inefficient as it is curtailed more often. This paper investigates the effects on overall economic efficiency and individual customer welfare of natural uncoordinated rooftop PV investment processes that arise when customers invest in PV systems independently to maximize their individual welfare. We develop a novel game-theoretic framework that computes the annual payoffs to customers for different PV investment sizes, given the installations of other customers. This calculation is based on an optimal AC power flow model that includes inverter connection standards that link customers' annual payoffs via their effects on AC network voltages and consequent PV curtailment responses. We show that the interaction of PV investments produces a concave potential game with continuous action sets, which has a pure Nash equilibrium that can be found using an adaptive learning process. Then, to evaluate the efficiency of the investments under the game model, we compute an centrally-coordinated PV investment profile, found by solving an optimal PV sizing problem that maximizes social welfare across all customers. Comparing the value of investment patterns for the game and the centrally-coordinated optimization shows: (i) the inefficiency of the Nash equilibrium is 1.4, which indicates the efficiency loss resulting from uncoordinated PV investments, and (ii) the inequity of a skewed distribution of benefits, penalising customers closer to the distribution transformer and benefiting those towards the end of the feeder. This model provides a quantitative tool for evaluating policies and regulations that improved coordination and allocation of PV hosting capacity (and that of other energy distributed energy resources) between customers on LV feeders.

[1]  L. Shapley,et al.  Fictitious Play Property for Games with Identical Interests , 1996 .

[2]  Fainan Hassan,et al.  Integration of Distributed Generation in the Power System: Bollen/Integration of Distributed Generation , 2011 .

[3]  Hao Jan Liu,et al.  Fast Local Voltage Control Under Limited Reactive Power: Optimality and Stability Analysis , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Archie C. Chapman,et al.  Learning in Unknown Reward Games: Application to Sensor Networks , 2014, Comput. J..

[5]  Jason R. Marden,et al.  A Model-Free Approach to Wind Farm Control Using Game Theoretic Methods , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[6]  J. Goodman Note on Existence and Uniqueness of Equilibrium Points for Concave N-Person Games , 1965 .

[7]  Yusun Chang,et al.  Reinforcement Learning for Repeated Power Control Game in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  Math Bollen,et al.  Integration of Distributed Generation in the Power System , 2008 .

[9]  F. Alvarado,et al.  Designing cost effective demand management contracts using game theory , 1999, IEEE Power Engineering Society. 1999 Winter Meeting (Cat. No.99CH36233).

[10]  Zhengyuan Zhou,et al.  Learning in games with continuous action sets and unknown payoff functions , 2019, Math. Program..

[11]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Optimal inverter VAR control in distribution systems with high PV penetration , 2011, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[12]  William H. Sandholm,et al.  Learning in Games via Reinforcement and Regularization , 2014, Math. Oper. Res..

[13]  Gregor Verbic,et al.  A novel probabilistic framework to study the impact of photovoltaic-battery systems on low-voltage distribution networks , 2019, Applied Energy.

[14]  A. Bose,et al.  Mixed-integer second-order cone programing model for VAR optimisation and network reconfiguration in active distribution networks , 2016 .

[15]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[16]  Jason R. Marden,et al.  Revisiting log-linear learning: Asynchrony, completeness and payoff-based implementation , 2010, 2010 48th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[17]  Christian Ibars,et al.  Distributed Demand Management in Smart Grid with a Congestion Game , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[18]  Ulrich Berger,et al.  Fictitious play in 2×n games , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[19]  David J. Hill,et al.  Multi-Timescale Coordinated Voltage/Var Control of High Renewable-Penetrated Distribution Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  P.T. Krein,et al.  Game-Theoretic Control of Small-Scale Power Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[21]  Archie C. Chapman,et al.  Convergent Learning Algorithms for Unknown Reward Games , 2013, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[22]  P. Rodriguez,et al.  Local Reactive Power Control Methods for Overvoltage Prevention of Distributed Solar Inverters in Low-Voltage Grids , 2011, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[23]  Liu Feng A Game Theory Based Planning Model and Analysis for Hybrid Power System with Wind Generators-Photovoltaic Panels-Storage Batteries , 2011 .