Future perspectives in intrapartum fetal surveillance.

Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) has aided intrapartum fetal surveillance for more than four decades. In spite of numerous trials comparing EFM with standard fetal heart rate (FHR) auscultation, it remains unclear that this modality has led to improved perinatal outcomes, especially lower rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A variety of ancillary methods have been developed to improve the accuracy of EFM for predicting fetal compromise. At present, a limited number of studies have shown that the addition of fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis to visual interpretation of FHR patterns resulted in better fetal outcomes. However, the shortcomings of visual interpretation of FHR patterns persist. Although automated systems for FHR analysis have been developed, they have not been widely used or proven to enhance the value of intrapartum fetal surveillance. This article discusses future directions for novel intrapartum fetal surveillance systems that leverage the long experience gained from EFM to enhance the level of risk assessment and prognosis.

[1]  J Adam The future of fetal monitoring. , 2012 .

[2]  Doina Precup,et al.  Classification of Normal and Hypoxic Fetuses From Systems Modeling of Intrapartum Cardiotocography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  George A. Macones,et al.  Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles , 2009 .

[5]  Sandy Weininger,et al.  Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Objective computerized fetal heart rate analysis , 1998, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[7]  H. Norén,et al.  Reduced prevalence of metabolic acidosis at birth: an analysis of established STAN usage in the total population of deliveries in a Swedish district hospital. , 2010, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  E P Richards The Supreme Court rules on medical device liability--or does it? , 1997, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[9]  Philip A Warrick,et al.  New perspectives in electronic fetal surveillance , 2013, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[10]  Enrico Bertino,et al.  WAPM Working Group on Nutrition: Potential chronobiotic role of human milk in sleep regulation , 2012, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[11]  L. Devoe,et al.  Prognostic components of computerized fetal biophysical testing. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  J. Waller,et al.  A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  I. Amer-Wåhlin,et al.  Foetal ECG and STAN technology—a review , 2005 .

[14]  L D Devoe Computerized fetal heart rate analysis and neural networks in antepartum fetal surveillance. , 1996, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.