Opening the sources of accountability

This paper scrutinizes the concept of accountability in light of free and open source software. On the view that increasing accountability grants value to society by motivating those most likely and able to prevent risk and harm to do so, I argue that while developing software collaboratively, licensing it openly, and distributing its source code freely are promising first steps in the long journey to rehabilitate accountability in our highly computerized society, our very understanding of what accountability is changes too. This paper analyzes the concept of accountability in an open environment and explores the implications in two mission–critical application fields in which software plays a significant role — electronic voting, and electronic medical records. It further considers the potential remedies to accountability’s erosion that free and open source software offer, and the ways in which accountability can be generalized to collective action if we understand it less as punishability and more as a culture that encourages the prevention of risk and harm. With such reconceptualized accountability in mind, I find that code visibility, a self–imposed standard of care and sensible licensing arrangements, are a potent, practical, and effective alternative to the strict liability standards offered as a solution to the accountability problem by earlier scholars.

[1]  Leon J. Osterweil,et al.  Strategic directions in software quality , 1996, CSUR.

[2]  B. Latour Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[3]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Safeware: System Safety and Computers , 1995 .

[4]  Brian Cantwell Smith,et al.  The limits of correctness , 1985, CSOC.

[5]  Richard E. Zultner,et al.  TQM for technical teams , 1993, CACM.

[6]  Jeffrey S. Norris,et al.  Mission-critical development with open source software: lessons learned , 2004, IEEE Software.

[7]  David Lorge Parnas,et al.  Evaluation of safety-critical software , 1990, CACM.

[8]  Joel Feinberg,et al.  Sua Culpa , 1985 .

[9]  John M. Mulvey,et al.  Accountability and computer decision systems , 1995, CACM.

[10]  Nancy G. Leveson Safety as a system property , 1995, CACM.

[11]  J. Moor What Is Computer Ethics?* , 1985, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[12]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[13]  Anton Vedder Accountability of Internet access and service providers – strict liability entering ethics? , 2004, Ethics and Information Technology.

[14]  Jonathon E. Mote,et al.  The laws of the markets , 2000 .

[15]  Peter G. Neumann Risks to the public in computers and related systems , 2004, SOEN.

[16]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Professional Ethics in Information Systems: A Personal Perspective , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Steven Weber,et al.  The Success of Open Source , 2004 .

[18]  Peter Laslett,et al.  Two Treatises of Government , 1948 .

[19]  Warren Sack,et al.  The reproduction of open source software programming communities , 2003 .

[20]  H. Nissenbaum Accountability in a computerized society , 1997 .