Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Moore,et al. Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] S. Bacon,et al. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[4] IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.
[5] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] G. Studebaker. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[10] M R Leek,et al. FO processing and the separation of competing speech signals by listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[11] S. Soli,et al. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] C W Turner,et al. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] John H Grose,et al. Age Effects in Temporal Envelope Processing: Speech Unmasking and Auditory Steady State Responses , 2009, Ear and hearing.
[14] Andrew J Oxenham,et al. Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] M. Schroeder. Reference Signal for Signal Quality Studies , 1968 .
[16] Kostas Kokkinakis,et al. A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[18] B C Moore,et al. Comparisons of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] A. Boothroyd,et al. Voice Fundamental Frequency as an Auditory Supplement to the Speechreading of Sentences , 1988, Ear and hearing.
[20] R. H. Wilson,et al. Influence of pulsed masking on the threshold for spondees. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] Bomjun J. Kwon,et al. AUX: A scripting language for auditory signal processing and software packages for psychoacoustic experiments and education , 2011, Behavior research methods.
[23] René H Gifford,et al. An examination of speech recognition in a modulated background and of forward masking in younger and older listeners. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[24] B J Kwon,et al. Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] D D Dirks,et al. Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[26] S P Bacon,et al. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[27] Oldooz Hazrati,et al. Tackling the combined effects of reverberation and masking noise using ideal channel selection. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[28] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] B. Shinn-Cunningham. Object-based auditory and visual attention , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[31] Joshua G. W. Bernstein,et al. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] B. Kwon,et al. Spatial and Temporal Effects of Interleaved Masking in Cochlear Implants , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[33] G S Donaldson,et al. Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearing. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] Yi Hu,et al. Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.