Electrically enhanced crossflow membrane filtration of oily waste water using the membrane as a cathode

Abstract The effect of an external electric field on the flux in crossflow membrane filtration of a model oily waste water was studied using a carbon fibre – carbon composite membrane as a cathode. Limiting fluxes for low flow rate increased significantly under the conditions studied, from 75 l/m 2  h without an electric field to more than 350 l/m 2  h using an electric field. The experimentally determined increase in the limiting flux showed good agreement with the theoretical value of 430 l/m 2  h calculated using a simple model. The limiting flux increase was affected by the electrophoretic mobility of the oil droplets and the applied electric field strength. When there were no cakes without an electric field due to the high flow rate, the flux increase when using an electric field under at the same conditions was minor. The critical electric field strength was determined, and experimentally obtained values were corresponded with calculated values. Decreasing the crossflow velocity above the critical electric field strength increased the flux, or had no effect, depending on the size of the particles. Permeate quality was also improved to some extent when using the electric field, and a membrane with a large pore size could be used when an electric field was applied. The main disadvantage in using the membrane as a cathode was foaming at the membrane surface causing decrease in the flux enhancement as the conductivity of the feed increased. It was not possible to restore the flux to the original value by applying an electric field after filtration of the oil emulsion without an electric field. An intermittent electric field was thus not efficient enough for keeping the flux at high level.

[1]  C. Trägårdh,et al.  Design of a crossflow microfiltration unit for studies of flux and particle transport , 1997 .

[2]  G. Rios,et al.  Basic transport mechanisms of ultrafiltration in the presence of an electric field , 1988 .

[3]  G. Trägårdh,et al.  Water permeability in ultrafiltration and microfiltration: Viscous and electroviscous effects , 1997 .

[4]  J. D. Henry,et al.  A solid/liquid separation process based on cross flow and electrofiltration , 1977 .

[5]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration , 1994 .

[6]  W. Bowen,et al.  Electrically enhanced separation processes: the basis of in situ intermittent electrolytic membrane cleaning (IIEMC) and in situ electrolytic membrane restoration (IEMR) , 1989 .

[7]  Gun Trägårdh,et al.  Determining the zeta-potential of ceramic microfiltration membranes using the electroviscous effect , 1998 .

[8]  Richard J. Wakeman,et al.  Membrane fouling prevention in crossflow microfiltration by the use of electric fields , 1987 .

[9]  W. Bowen Electrochemical Aspects of Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration , 1993 .

[10]  W. Bowen,et al.  Pulsed electrokinetic cleaning of cellulose nitrate microfiltration membranes , 1992 .

[11]  C. Guizard,et al.  Electronically conductive mineral membranes designed for electro-ultrafiltration , 1989 .

[12]  A. Jönsson,et al.  Cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes after treatment of oily waste water , 1994 .

[13]  C. Mullon,et al.  Steady-State Modeling of Electroultrafiltration at Constant Concentration , 1985 .