Firing patterns and synaptic potentials of identified giant aspiny interneurons in the rat neostriatum

Intracellular recordings were made in vivo from 9 giant aspiny neurons in the neostriatum of urethane-anesthetized rats. The cells were identified by intracellular staining with HRP or biocytin. The neurons exhibited morphological features typical of neostriatal cholinergic interneurons. Six of the cells were obtained from intact animals, while 3 were recorded from rats with ipsilateral hemidecortications. Giant aspiny neurons were characterized by their slow irregular but tonic (3–10/sec) spontaneous activity and long-duration action potentials. Examination of the underlying membrane potential trajectories during spontaneous firing revealed that individual action potentials were triggered from spontaneous small (1–5 mV) depolarizing potentials. These spontaneous potentials exhibited the voltage sensitivity of ordinary EPSPs. They were much less frequent during the 80–200 msec pause in tonic afferent input that follows the excitation evoked by cortical or thalamic stimulation, and were decreased in frequency in decorticate animals. Their rise times and half-widths matched those expected for unitary synaptic potentials placed proximally on the surface of the neurons. Low-intensity stimulation of neostriatal afferents produced small short-latency EPSPs that appeared to be composed of responses identical to the spontaneous depolarizing potentials. The latencies of the EPSPs evoked from the cerebral cortex and thalamus were consistent with a monosynaptic input from both structures, but the maximal size of the EPSPs was much smaller than that evoked in spiny neurons, suggesting that a smaller number of afferent inputs make synapses with each of the aspiny cells. Giant aspiny neurons exhibited much larger input resistances and longer time constants than spiny neostriatal neurons. They also exhibited relatively linear steady-state current-voltage relationship compared to spiny projection cells. Input resistances ranged from 71–105 M omega, and time constants ranged from 17.8–28.5 msec. Analysis of the charging transients in response to current pulses yielded estimates of dendritic length of approximately 1 length constant. Repetitive firing of the neurons was limited by a powerful spike afterhyperpolarization and by a strong spike frequency adaptation. The sensitivity of the giant aspiny interneuron to a relatively small number of proximal afferent synaptic contacts, its tonic firing, and its widespread dendritic and axonal fields place it in an excellent position to act as a modulator of the excitability of neostriatal projection neurons in advance of the onset of movement-related neostriatal activity.

[1]  C. Wilson,et al.  Cellular mechanisms controlling the strength of synapses. , 1988, Journal of electron microscopy technique.

[2]  M. Difiglia Synaptic organization of cholinergic neurons in the monkey neostriatum , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  T. Pasik,et al.  A Golgi study of neuronal types in the neostriatum of monkeys , 1976, Brain Research.

[4]  W. Rall Time constants and electrotonic length of membrane cylinders and neurons. , 1969, Biophysical journal.

[5]  M. Kawato Cable properties of a neuron model with non-uniform membrane resistivity. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  J. Deniau,et al.  Morphology of the substantia nigra pars reticulata projection neurons intracellularly labeled with HRP , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  C. Gerfen Synaptic organization of the striatum. , 1988, Journal of electron microscopy technique.

[8]  J. E. Vaughn,et al.  Immunocytochemical localization of choline acetyltransferase within the rat neostriatum: A correlated light and electron microscopic study of cholinergic neurons and synapses , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  A. D. Smith,et al.  Characterization of cholinergic neurons in the rat neostriatum. A combination of choline acetyltransferase immunocytochemistry, Golgi-impregnation and electron microscopy , 1984, Neuroscience.

[10]  T. Powell,et al.  The structure of the caudate nucleus of the cat: light and electron microscopy. , 1971, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  J. Rajkowski,et al.  Tonically discharging putamen neurons exhibit set-dependent responses. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  S. L. Liles Single-unit responses of caudate neurons to stimulation of frontal cortex, substantia nigra and entopeduncular nucleus in cats. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  N. A. Buchwald,et al.  Intracellular responses of caudate output neurons to orthodromic stimulation , 1975, Brain Research.

[14]  P. Groves A theory of the functional organization of the neostriatum and the neostriatal control of voluntary movement , 1983, Brain Research Reviews.

[15]  W Rall,et al.  Dendritic location of synapses and possible mechanisms for the monosynaptic EPSP in motoneurons. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Charles J. Wilson,et al.  Spontaneous firing patterns of identified spiny neurons in the rat neostriatum , 1981, Brain Research.

[17]  S. T. Kitai,et al.  A Golgi study of rat neostriatal neurons: Light microscopic analysis , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  H. Dodt,et al.  Muscarinic slow excitation and muscarinic inhibition of synaptic transmission in the rat neostriatum. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  D. Reis,et al.  Immunocytochemical localization of enkephalin in the neostriatum of rat brain: A light and electron microscopic study , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  G. Graveland,et al.  The frequency and distribution of medium-sized neurons with indented nuclei in the primate and rodent neostriatum , 1985, Brain Research.

[21]  M. Kimura The role of primate putamen neurons in the association of sensory stimuli with movement , 1986, Neuroscience Research.

[22]  M. Delong,et al.  Putamen: Activity of Single Units during Slow and Rapid Arm Movements , 1973, Science.

[23]  P. Somogyi,et al.  A second type of striatonigral neuron: a comparison between retrogradely labelled and golgi-stained neurons at the light and electron microscopic levels , 1981, Neuroscience.

[24]  T. Kita,et al.  Passive electrical membrane properties of rat neostriatal neurons in an in vitro slice preparation , 1984, Brain Research.

[25]  S. T. Kitai,et al.  Morphological and physiological properties of neostriatal neurons: An intracellular horseradish peroxidase study in the rat , 1982, Neuroscience.

[26]  K. Horikawa,et al.  A versatile means of intracellular labeling: injection of biocytin and its detection with avidin conjugates , 1988, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  A Akaike,et al.  Muscarinic inhibition as a dominant role in cholinergic regulation of transmission in the caudate nucleus. , 1988, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[28]  S. T. Kitai,et al.  Medium spiny neuron projection from the rat striatum: An intracellular horseradish peroxidase study , 1980, Brain Research.