Mathematical optimization of elastic properties: application to cementless hip stem design.

The designer of a cementless hip stem in total hip replacement must find a balance between two conflicting demands. On the one hand, a stiff stem shields the surrounding bone from mechanical loading (stress shielding), which may lead to bone loss, particularly around the proximal part of the stem. Reducing the stem stiffness decreases the amount of stress shielding and hence the amount of bone loss. However, this measure inevitably promotes higher proximal interface stresses and thereby increases the risk of proximal interface failure. The designer's task therefore is to optimize the stem stiffness in order to find the best compromise in the conflict. Yet, a better compromise might be found when the stem material was nonhomogeneous, in other words when an arbitrary distribution of the elastic properties inside the stem was allowed. The number of conceivable designs would increase enormously, making the designer's task almost impossible. In the present paper, we develop a numerical design optimization method to determine the optimal stiffness characteristics for a hip stem. A finite element program is coupled with a numerical optimization method, thus producing a design optimization scheme. The scheme minimizes the probability for interface failure while limiting the amount of bone loss, by adapting the parameters describing the nonhomogeneous elastic modulus distribution. As an example, a simplified model of a hip stem is made, whose modulus distribution is optimized. Assuming equal long-term bone loss, the maximum interface stress can be reduced by over 50 percent when compared to a homogeneous flexible stem, thus demonstrating the value of the new approach.

[1]  Klaus Schittkowski,et al.  NLPQL: A fortran subroutine solving constrained nonlinear programming problems , 1986 .

[2]  J. Chae,et al.  Macroscopic and microscopic evidence of prosthetic fixation with porous-coated materials. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[4]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Friction and stem stiffness affect dynamic interface motion in total hip replacement , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The predictive value of stress shielding for quantification of adaptive bone resorption around hip replacements. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  D R Sumner,et al.  Adaptive bone remodeling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: A comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  S D Cook,et al.  An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. , 1985, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  Robert D. Adams,et al.  Strength Predictions for Lap Joints, Especially with Composite Adherends. A Review , 1989 .

[9]  Ashok Dhondu Belegundu,et al.  A Study of Mathematical Programming Methods for Structural Optimization , 1985 .

[10]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  R Huiskes,et al.  Some fundamental aspects of human joint replacement. Analyses of stresses and heat conduction in bone-prosthesis structures. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[13]  J. Arora,et al.  A study of mathematical programmingmethods for structural optimization. Part II: Numerical results , 1985 .

[14]  J. Arora,et al.  Performance of some SQP algorithms on structural design problems , 1986 .

[15]  George I. N. Rozvany,et al.  Structural Design via Optimality Criteria: The Prager Approach to Structural Optimization , 1989 .

[16]  R. Morrell,et al.  Design with non-ductile materials , 1982 .

[17]  A M Weinstein,et al.  Interface mechanics of porous titanium implants. , 1981, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  J. E. Gordon,et al.  Structures: Or Why Things Don't Fall Down , 1978 .

[19]  J. H. Kuiper,et al.  Numerical optimization of artificial hip joint designs , 1993 .

[20]  R A Brand,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis: a new method for implant design and a comparison with parametric finite element analysis. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  R. Huiskes The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  H Weinans,et al.  Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. , 1989, Orthopedics.

[23]  S D Cook,et al.  Histologic Analysis of Retrieved Human Porous‐Coated Total Joint Components , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  W H Harris,et al.  A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  H. Tensi,et al.  Non-Linear Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of a Cementless Hip Endoprosthesis , 1989, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[26]  R Huiskes,et al.  Mathematical shape optimization of hip prosthesis design. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems , 1986 .