on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation , 2013 Thinking Styles and Product Development Project Types : How to Match Them ?

Abstract Focusing on the characteristics of different thinking styles and different product development project types, we suggest that people should adapt their thinking strategies according to the challenge they face and choose a thinking style that is a best match for the type of project they are working on. Even though people can perform well in more than one thinking style, they can be more successful if they adequately choose the most appropriate one for solving the problem in front of them. Considering that different thinking styles have different ideas and conclusions as results, we propose how to match them to a specific product development project type that has a certain degree of change in the product as a deliverable. For further research, these findings open the possibility to define the most appropriate creative problem solving methods and techniques that spur and support a specific style of thinking.

[1]  P. Trott Innovation Management And New Product Development , 2004 .

[2]  Mauro Maldonato,et al.  The creative brain , 2014, 2014 5th IEEE Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom).

[3]  John Preston,et al.  Winning at New Products , 1988 .

[4]  Terence Hines,et al.  Left Brain/Right Brain Mythology and Implications for Management and Training , 1987 .

[5]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .

[6]  Zaleha Ismail,et al.  Supporting Engineering Students’ Thinking and Creative Problem Solving through Blended Learning , 2012 .

[7]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  Intuition in Management Research: A Historical Review , 2012 .

[8]  J. Baron,et al.  Outcome bias in decision evaluation. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  K. Clark,et al.  Creating project plans to focus product development. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[10]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Strategic Focus: Why We Do Projects , 2007, PICMET '07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[11]  P. Robinson,et al.  A Comparison of Four Scales Predicting Entrepreneurship , 1996 .

[12]  S. Handley,et al.  Rational and experimental thinking: a study of the Rei , 2000 .

[13]  Jean B. Gasen,et al.  Hemispheric Lateralization and Programming Ability , 1990 .

[14]  S. Epstein,et al.  Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Joe Amadi-Echendu Thinking styles of technical knowledge workers in the systems of innovation paradigm , 2007 .

[16]  Junfeng Zhang,et al.  Product Development Strategy, Product Innovation Performance, and the Mediating Role of Knowledge Utilization: Evidence from Subsidiaries in China , 2009 .

[17]  R. Cooper,et al.  The Impact of Product Innovativeness on Performance , 1991 .

[18]  I. Amzat Brain hemisphere characteristics of some Malaysian university managers in relation to their decision styles: A measurement model , 2011 .

[19]  M. Lumsdaine,et al.  Thinking Preferences of Engineering Students: Implications for Curriculum Restructuring , 1995 .

[20]  J. Turner The Handbook of Project-based Management: Leading Strategic Change in Organizations , 2008 .

[21]  Bruce T. Barkley Project Management in New Product Development , 2007 .

[22]  K. Seltman Marketing for management. , 2004, Marketing health services.

[23]  S. Newstead Are there two different types of thinking? , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .