The role of triage liaison physicians on mitigating overcrowding in emergency departments: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES The objective was to examine the effectiveness of triage liaison physicians (TLPs) on mitigating the effects of emergency department (ED) overcrowding. METHODS Electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, HealthSTAR, Dissertation Abstracts, and ABI/INFORM Global), controlled trial registry websites, conference proceedings, study references, contact with experts in the field, and correspondence with authors were used to identify potentially relevant TLP studies. Intervention studies in which a TLP was used to influence ED overcrowding metrics (length of stay [LOS] in minutes, physician initial assessment [PIA], and left without being seen [LWBS]) were included in the review. Two reviewers independently conducted data extraction and assessed the citation relevance, inclusion, and study quality. For continuous outcomes, weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated and reported with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For dichotomous variables, individual and pooled statistics were calculated as relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. RESULTS From 14,446 potentially relevant studies, 28 were included in the systematic review. Thirteen were journal publications, 12 were abstracts, and three were Web-based articles. Most studies employed before-after designs; 23 of the 28 studies were considered of weak quality. Based on the statistical pooling of data from two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), TLP resulted in shorter ED LOS compared to nurse-led triage (WMD = -36.85 min; 95% CI = -51.11 to -22.58). One of these RCTs showed a significant reduction in the PIA associated to TLP presence (WMD = -30.00 min; 95% CI = -56.91 to -3.09); the other RCT showed no change in LWBS due to a CI that included unity (RR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.00). CONCLUSIONS While the evidence summarized here suggests that to have a TLP is an effective intervention to mitigate the effects of ED overcrowding, due to the weak research methods identified, more research is required before its widespread implementation.

[1]  B. Nelson,et al.  Faculty triage shortens emergency department length of stay. , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[2]  F. Song,et al.  Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. , 2003, Health technology assessment.

[3]  Karin V Rhodes,et al.  A conceptual model of emergency department crowding. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  K. Kelly,et al.  Publication bias of randomized controlled trials in emergency medicine. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[5]  The effects of an accelerated triage and treatment protocol on left without being seen rates and wait times of urgent patients at a military emergency department. , 2008, Military medicine.

[6]  Brian H Rowe,et al.  Predictive validity of a computerized emergency triage tool. , 2007, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[7]  J. Terris,et al.  Making an IMPACT on emergency department flow: improving patient processing assisted by consultant at triage , 2004, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[8]  Elena Parmelli,et al.  Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  Dominik Aronsky,et al.  The effect of physician triage on emergency department length of stay. , 2010, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[10]  Marisa Shrimpling,et al.  Redesigning triage to reduce waiting times. , 2002, Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association.

[11]  Jeremy M. Grimshaw,et al.  Do printed educational materials have any effect on professional practice and health care outcomes , 2009 .

[12]  Rhonda J Rosychuk,et al.  Characteristics of patients who leave emergency departments without being seen. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[13]  Michael J. Schull,et al.  Frequency, determinants and impact of overcrowding in emergency departments in Canada: a national survey. , 2007 .

[14]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[15]  C C Lau,et al.  Triage rapid initial assessment by doctor (TRIAD) improves waiting time and processing time of the emergency department , 2006, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[16]  Daniel M Fatovich,et al.  Emergency medicine , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  B. H. Thomas,et al.  A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. , 2004, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[18]  Nicola J. Ross,et al.  Evaluation of a 'See and Treat' pilot study introduced to an emergency department. , 2004, Accident and emergency nursing.

[19]  B. Mcnicholl,et al.  Team triage improves emergency department efficiency , 2004, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[20]  G. Braitberg,et al.  Multidisciplinary assessment at triage: a new way forward. , 2004, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[21]  J. Richards,et al.  Overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments: complex causes and disturbing effects. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[22]  Geoff M. Anderson,et al.  Development of a minimization instrument for allocation of a hospital-level performance improvement intervention to reduce waiting times in Ontario emergency departments , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[23]  J. P. Travers,et al.  Avoiding prolonged waiting time during busy periods in the emergency department: is there a role for the senior emergency physician in triage? , 2006, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[24]  Brian H Rowe,et al.  Impact of a triage liaison physician on emergency department overcrowding and throughput: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[25]  D. Green,et al.  Rapid assessment team reduces waiting time , 1999 .

[26]  Jane M. Young,et al.  Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[27]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[28]  A D Oxman,et al.  The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials , 1998, BMJ.

[29]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  Donna Kelly,et al.  Impact of rapid entry and accelerated care at triage on reducing emergency department patient wait times, lengths of stay, and rate of left without being seen. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[31]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[32]  Ben Vandermeer,et al.  A systematic review identifies a lack of standardization in methods for handling missing variance data. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.