Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socioscientific issues education

An important distinction can be made between the science, technology, and society (STS) movement of past years and the domain of socioscientific issues (SSI). STS education as typically practiced does not seem embedded in a coherent developmental or sociological framework that explicitly considers the psychological and epistemological growth of the child, nor the development of character or virtue. In contrast, the SSI movement focuses on empowering students to consider how science-based issues reflect, in part, moral principles and elements of virtue that encompass their own lives, as well as the physical and social world around them. The focus of this paper is to describe a research-based framework of current research and practice that identifies factors associated with reasoning about socioscientific issues and provide a working model that illustrates theoretical and conceptual links among key psychological, sociological, and developmental factors central to SSI and science education. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed, 89:357–377, 2005

[1]  Lawrence B. Flick,et al.  Scientific inquiry and nature of science : implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education , 2004 .

[2]  G. Aikenhead,et al.  Toward a First Nations Cross-Cultural Science and Technology Curriculum. , 1997 .

[3]  Erminia Pedretti.  Septic tank crisis: a case study of science, technology and society education in an elementary school , 1997 .

[4]  D. Krebs,et al.  Gender and Dilemma Differences in Real-Life Moral Judgment. , 1996 .

[5]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  The effects of STS-oriented instruction on female tenth graders' cognitive structure outcomes and the role of student scientific epistemological beliefs , 2000 .

[6]  Dana L. Zeidler,et al.  Moral issues and social policy in science education: Closing the literacy gap , 1984 .

[7]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue , 2004 .

[8]  M. Berkowitz,et al.  Integrating Science Education and Character Education , 2003 .

[9]  Cathleen C. Loving,et al.  Defining "Science" in a Multicultural World: Implications for Science Education. , 1998 .

[10]  D. Zeidler,et al.  Identifying mediating factors of moral reasoning in science education , 1984 .

[11]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  The Practice of constructivism in science education , 1993 .

[12]  M. Shamos,et al.  The Myth of Scientific Literacy , 1995 .

[13]  Thomas R. Koballa,et al.  Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools: Developing Fundamental Knowledge and Skills , 2005 .

[14]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Developing and Acting Upon One's Conception of the Nature of Science: A Follow-Up Study. , 2000 .

[15]  J. Parker.  To trust or not to trust. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  E. Turiel.  The Development of Morality , 2007 .

[17]  D. Zeidler,et al.  Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas , 2002 .

[18]  Larry Nucci,et al.  Education in the Moral Domain: References , 2001 .

[19]  G. Aikenhead,et al.  Collective Decision Making in the Social Context of Science. , 1985 .

[20]  Dana L. Zeidler,et al.  The Role of Moral Reasoning and the Status of Socioscientific Issues in Science Education , 2003 .

[21]  Stein Dankert Kolstø,et al.  'To trust or not to trust,…'-pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue , 2001 .

[22]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning , 2001 .

[23]  Jeffrey Bisanz,et al.  Assessing literacy in science: evaluation of scientific news briefs , 1997 .

[24]  Jim Ryder,et al.  Identifying Science Understanding for Functional Scientific Literacy , 2001 .

[25]  D. Zeidler,et al.  Beliefs in the Nature of Science and Responses to Socioscientific Issues , 2003 .

[26]  Lars Fuglsang,et al.  Three perspectives in science, technology and society studies (STS) in the policy context , 2000 .

[27]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research , 2004 .

[28]  J. Carpendale,et al.  Situational variation in moral judgment: In a stage or on a stage? , 1992, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[29]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[30]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[31]  Kathleen Hogan,et al.  Small Groups' Ecological Reasoning While Making an Environmental Management Decision. , 2002 .

[32]  D. Zeidler.  The central role of fallacious thinking in science education , 1997 .

[33]  J. Osborne,et al.  The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science , 1999 .

[34]  Edgar W. Jenkins,et al.  Benchmarks for Science Literacy: a review symposium∗ , 1995 .

[35]  S. D. Kolstø.  Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues , 2001 .

[36]  Anne Colby,et al.  The measurement of moral judgment, Vol. 1: Theoretical foundations and research validation; Vol. 2: Standard issue scoring manual. , 1987 .

[37]  Donna Y. Ford,et al.  The Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education , 1996 .

[38]  Angela Calabrese Barton,et al.  Feminist Science Education , 1998 .

[39]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[40]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Seeking Directions for Change: the personalisation and politicisation of science education , 1994 .

[41]  Matthew W. Keefer,et al.  Judging the Quality of Peer-Led Student Dialogues , 2000 .

[42]  E. Settelmaier.  Dilemmas with Dilemmas… Exploring the suitability of dilemma stories as a way of addressing ethical issues in science education , 2003 .

[43]  Cathleen C. Loving,et al.  Investigation of preservice elementary teachers' thinking about science , 2002 .

[44]  D. Hodson.  Time for action: Science education for an alternative future , 2003 .

[45]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach , 1999 .

[46]  F. Rutherford.  Science for all Americans / F. James Rutherford , 1990 .

[47]  Anne Colby,et al.  The Measurement Of Moral Judgment , 1987 .

[48]  Gloria J. Ladson-Billings,et al.  The Dreamkeepers: Successful Teachers of African American Children , 1994 .

[49]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[50]  Matthew W. Keefer.  Designing Reflections on Practice: Helping Teachers Apply Cognitive Learning Principles in an SFT — Inquiry-Based Learning Program , 2002 .

[51]  S. Harding.  Is Science Multicultural?: Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies , 1998 .

[52]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues , 2003 .

[53]  Laurence Simonneaux.  Role-play or debate to promote students' argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis , 2001 .

[54]  J. Snarey.  Cross-cultural universality of social-moral development: a critical review of Kohlbergian research. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[55]  D. Kuhn.  Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking , 1993 .

[56]  Cathleen C. Loving,et al.  Recognizing and Solving Ethical Dilemmas in Diverse Science Classrooms , 2003 .

[57]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[58]  Etta R. Hollins,et al.  Pathways to success in school : culturally responsive teaching , 1999 .

[59]  Gwyneth Hughes,et al.  Marginalization of Socioscientific Material in Science–Technology–Society Science Curricula: Some Implications for Gender Inclusivity and Curriculum Reform , 2000 .

[60]  Stein DankerT. Kolstoe.  Consensus projects: teaching science for citizenship , 2000 .

[61]  D. Hodson,et al.  From rhetoric to action: Implementing sts education through action research , 1995 .

[62]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Science for Students With Disabilities , 1992 .

[63]  Implications of Cultural Diversity for the Universality Claims of Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Reasoning , 1988 .

[64]  D. Kuhn.  THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[65]  Blythe McVicker Clinchy,et al.  Women s ways of knowing: The development of self , 1988 .

[66]  R. C. Laugksch.  Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview , 2000 .

[67]  E. D. H. join,et al.  Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know , 1987 .

[68]  Mary Ratcliffe,et al.  Pupil decision‐making about socio‐scientific issues within the science curriculum , 1997 .

[69]  M. Belenky,et al.  Women's ways of knowing : the development of self, voice, and mind , 1988 .

[70]  Etta R. Hollins,et al.  Preparing Teachers for Cultural Diversity , 1997 .

[71]  R. Levinson.  Teaching Bioethics in Science: Crossing a Bridge Too Far , 2004 .

[72]  R. Bell.  Perusing Padora's Box: Exploring The What, When, And How Of Nature Of Science Instruction , 2006 .

[73]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Embedding Nature of Science Instruction in Preservice Elementary Science Courses: Abandoning Scientism, But... , 2001 .

[74]  Carol Gilligan,et al.  Moral orientation and moral development , 1987 .

[75]  Marvin W. Berkowitz,et al.  Moral Education : Theory and Application , 1985 .

[76]  Matthew W. Keefer.  Moral Reasoning and Case-Based Approaches to Ethical Instruction in Science , 2003 .

[77]  The role of argument during discourse about socioscientific issues , 2003 .

[78]  Catherine Lewis,et al.  A Deeper Look at Lesson Study. , 2004 .

[79]  Dana L. Zeidler,et al.  Students' Understanding of the Nature of Science and Their Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues: A Web-based Learning Inquiry , 2003 .

[80]  Joan Solomon,et al.  STS education : international perspectives on reform , 1994 .

[81]  Edgar W. Jenkins,et al.  Scientific Literacy and School Science Education. , 1990 .

[82]  D. Zeidler,et al.  The Morality of Socioscientific Issues: Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas. , 2004 .

[83]  Eleanor Dantzler Siebert,et al.  College Pathways to the Science Education Standards , 2001 .

[84]  R. Yager.  Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education. , 1996 .

[85]  Anne Colby.  Standard issue scoring manual , 1987 .

[86]  Dana L. Zeidler,et al.  The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education , 2003 .

[87]  L. Hoffman,et al.  Gender differences in moral development , 1988 .

[88]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[89]  A. Collins.  National Science Education Standards: A Political Document. , 1998 .

[90]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Fallacies and Student Discourse: Conceptualizing the Role of Critical Thinking in Science Education. , 1992 .

[91]  Marvin W. Berkowitz.  The Development of Sociomoral Discourse. , 1986 .

[92]  P. James Gaskell,et al.  Scientific literacy for decisionmaking and the social construction of scientific knowledge , 1994 .

[93]  Margery D. Osborne,et al.  Finding Meaning in Science: Lifeworld, Identity,and Self , 2004 .

[94]  Leslie W. Trowbridge,et al.  Teaching Secondary School Science: Strategies for Developing Scientific Literacy , 1995 .

[95]  J. Lemke.  Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education , 2001 .

[96]  R. Tong,et al.  Feminist Approaches to Bioethics , 2004 .

[97]  Anat Zohar,et al.  Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics , 2002 .

[98]  J. Andre,et al.  Caring; A Feminine Approach To Ethics and Moral Education , 1986 .

[99]  William W. Cobern,et al.  Contextual Constructivism: The Impact of Culture on the Learning and Teaching of Science. , 1993 .

[100]  Erminia Pedretti,et al.  Teaching Science, Technology, Society and Environment (STSE) Education , 2003 .

[101]  Angela Calabrese Barton,et al.  Teaching Science with Homeless Children: Pedagogy, Representation, and Identity. , 1998 .

[102]  W. Tate.  Returning to the Root: A Culturally Relevant Approach to Mathematics Pedagogy. , 1995 .

[103]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Science education as/for sociopolitical action , 2002 .

[104]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Improving science education : the contribution of research , 2000 .

[105]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science , 2000 .

[106]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Patterns of Informal Reasoning in the Context of Socioscientific Decision Making. , 2005 .

[107]  G. Seiler,et al.  Reversing the standard direction: Science emerging from the lives of African American students , 2001 .

[108]  R. Hackett.  Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[109]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Reasoning about data in middle school science , 1999 .

[110]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  The Significance of Content Knowledge for Informal Reasoning regarding Socioscientific Issues: Applying Genetics Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues. , 2005 .