Can response preparation begin before stimulus recognition finishes?

The present experiments were designed to determine whether information obtained early in the process of recognizing a stimulus can be used to begin preparing keypress responses before recognition of the stimulus has completely finished. This question is relevant to the recent debate between discrete (e.g., Sternberg, 1969a) and continuous (e.g., McClelland, 1979) models of human information processing. Stimulus sets were chosen so that recognition processes could extract incomplete preliminary information about a stimulus much faster than they could extract secondary information needed for unique stimulus identification. Discriminability of the secondary information was manipulated to vary the opportunity for response preparation based on preliminary information, with difficult secondary discriminations providing more time for response preparation than easy ones. Precues were given on some trials to allow response preparation to occur before the stimulus was presented, thereby reducing any difference in response preparation as a function of discriminability. Continuous models predict that precues should facilitate response preparation less when the secondary discrimination is difficult than when it is easy, and discrete models predict equal facilitation regardless of secondary discrimination difficulty. Evidence of response preparation was obtained with some but not all stimulus sets. The results were interpreted as support for the asynchronous discrete coding model (Miller, 1982a), in which response preparation can begin only after recognition processes have completely activated a code used in categorizing the stimulus.

[1]  J Miller,et al.  Effects of noise letters on decisions: Discrete or continuous flow of information? , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. Miller Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: in search of partial output. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[4]  A. Hartley Mental measurement of line length: the role of the standard. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Visual similarity and discrimination demands. , 1981 .

[6]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  R G Pachella,et al.  The manipulation of stimulus quality and the definition of stimulus encoding operations in memory scanning experiments , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  J. Miller Cognitive influences on perceptual processing. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  James L. McClelland On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[12]  C. Bundesen,et al.  Size scaling in visual pattern recognition. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind , 1978 .

[14]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Encoding, stimulus-response compatibility, and stages of processing , 1977 .

[15]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[16]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[17]  D A Taylor,et al.  Stage analysis of reaction time. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  C. Bundesen,et al.  Visual transformation of size. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  S. Sternberg Memory Scanning: New Findings and Current Controversies , 1975 .

[20]  S. Link The relative judgment theory of two choice response time , 1975 .

[21]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Chapter 2 – ATTENTION: THE PROCESSING OF MULTIPLE SOURCES OF INFORMATION* , 1974 .

[23]  R. Shepard,et al.  CHRONOMETRIC STUDIES OF THE ROTATION OF MENTAL IMAGES , 1973 .

[24]  M. Turvey On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. , 1973, Psychological review.

[25]  J. Jonides,et al.  A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as letter or as digit , 1972 .

[26]  G. Lockhead Processing dimensional stimuli: a note. , 1972, Psychological review.

[27]  Donald Bamber,et al.  Reaction times and error rates for judging nominal identity of letter strings , 1972 .

[28]  J R Simon,et al.  Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[30]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[31]  F. Donders On the speed of mental processes. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[32]  S. Sternberg Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.

[33]  E. Smith,et al.  Choice reaction time: an analysis of the major theoretical positions. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  M I Posner,et al.  Chronometric analysis of classification. , 1967, Psychological review.

[35]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[36]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Operationism and the concept of perception. , 1956, Psychological review.

[37]  P. Fitts,et al.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.