Prediction of conifer natural regeneration in a 'data-poor' environment

greater interest in natural regeneration. This paper describes a project that designed and tested a model to predict the likelihood of natural regeneration in an environment where long-term datasets were not available. A spreadsheet based model known as REGGIE (REGeneration GuIdancE) was designed based on first principles and silvicultural experience. It was tested on 129 sites of four conifer species on a wide range of sites throughout Britain; at each site an expert judged the likelihood of regeneration in the next 5 years in one of five classes: 0-20%, 21-40%, 41-60%, 61-80% and 81-100%. The REGGIE model agreed with the expert prediction on 63 of the 129 sites (48.8%). The validation data were then analyzed using an ordinal logistic regression. The minimal adequate model included fewer terms compared with REGGIE and, not surprisingly, was more accurate with respect to the expert prediction on 113 of the 129 sites (87.6%). An advantage of the ordinal logistic model is that we have devised a simple score based method of application which is easy to apply in the field. Informal validation of this model has suggested that it has potential to be used by forest managers as part of a strategy to raise understanding of how to use natural regeneration when transforming conifer stands to continuous cover in Britain.

[1]  J. D. Stewart,et al.  Predicting natural regeneration of white spruce in boreal mixedwood understories , 2001 .

[2]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Simulation model for natural regeneration of Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula and Betula pubescens. , 1987 .

[3]  D. O. Tegelmark Site factors as multivariate predictors of the success of natural regeneration in Scots pine forests , 1998 .

[4]  R. Harmer Natural Regeneration of Broadleaved Trees in Britain: I. Historical Aspects , 1994 .

[5]  A. G. Gordon Seed Manual for Forest Trees , 1992 .

[6]  R. Gill,et al.  The effects of varying deer density on natural regeneration in woodlands in lowland Britain , 2010 .

[7]  D. A. Marquis Quantitative silviculture for hardwood forests of the Alleghenies , 1994 .

[8]  S. Hale,et al.  Survival and early seedling growth of conifers with different shade tolerance in a Sitka spruce spacing trial and relationship to understorey light climate , 2004 .

[9]  J. Vanclay Modelling regeneration and recruitment in a tropical rain forest , 1992 .

[10]  J. Suárez,et al.  An Ecological Site Classification for Forestry in Great Britain with Special Reference to Grampian, Scotland , 1997 .

[11]  J. Zasada,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of white spruce regeneration after logging in interior Alaska , 1984 .

[12]  Dafydd Gibbon,et al.  1 User’s guide , 1998 .

[13]  H. Sterba,et al.  A model describing natural regeneration recruitment of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in Austria , 1997 .

[14]  Albert R. Stage,et al.  Predicting Regeneration in the Grand Fir-Cedar-Hemlock Ecosystem of the Northern Rocky Mountains , 1986, Forest Science.

[15]  W. L. Mason,et al.  The transformation of conifer forests in Britain — regeneration, gap size and silvicultural systems , 2001 .

[16]  W. Mason Changes in the management of British forests between 1945 and 2000 and possible future trends: Changes in British forest management , 2007 .

[17]  M. Shelton,et al.  Regenerating uneven-aged stands of loblolly and shortleaf pines: the current state of knowledge , 2000 .

[18]  T. Rooney Deer impacts on forest ecosystems: a North American perspective , 2001 .