On the augmented reproducibility in measurements on 3D orthodontic digital dental models and the definition of feature points.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore digital measurement methodology on 3-dimensional (3D) dental models. Standardised manipulation and practices have lead to reliable measurements on plaster casts. Identifying landmarks on digital models or digitised plaster casts is fundamentally different from actual measurements. Three-dimensional models are represented on flat screens and landmarks are individually indentified. A procedure is proposed that resolves the deficiencies associated with a 2-dimensional (2D) display through an appropriate model representation and through local optimisation. METHODS Fifteen models (OrthoProof) were exported to a locally developed 3D point indication software package, in which two measurement approaches were implemented involving standard projection with and without local search. Nine linear measurements were obtained from plaster casts and digital models. Statistical analysis included correlation and Friedman s nonparametric analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS For five out of nine linear measurements, digital indications yielded results significantly different from manual measurements (p = 0.05). Local search considerably improved measurement accuracy and reliability. CONCLUSIONS Measurements on plaster casts can differ significantly from those obtained through digital identification methods. These differences prove to be clinically relevant. Standardisation and optimisation resulted in improved and extremely reliable digital measurements.

[1]  Allen R Firestone,et al.  The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[2]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods , 1973 .

[3]  W. Wiltshire,et al.  Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  Filip Schutyser,et al.  Integration of digital dental casts in 3-dimensional facial photographs. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  A. Johal,et al.  Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. , 2011, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[6]  Paul W Major,et al.  Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  A. Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Integration of Digital Dental Casts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans , 2012, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[8]  Markus H. Gross,et al.  Feature Preserving Point Set Surfaces based on Non‐Linear Kernel Regression , 2009, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[9]  Taiji Sohmura,et al.  Complete 3-D reconstruction of dental cast shape using perceptual grouping , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Birte Melsen,et al.  From Alginate Impressions to Digital Virtual Models: Accuracy and Reproducibility , 2009, Journal of orthodontics.

[11]  W J Houston,et al.  The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[12]  A. Jacobson,et al.  An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[13]  A F Ayoub,et al.  Assessment of the Accuracy of a Three-Dimensional Imaging System for Archiving Dental Study Models , 2003, Journal of orthodontics.