A polygon-based modeling approach to assess exposure of resources and assets to wildfire

Spatially explicit burn probability modeling is increasingly applied to assess wildfire risk and inform mitigation strategy development. Burn probabilities are typically expressed on a per-pixel basis, calculated as the number of times a pixel burns divided by the number of simulation iterations. Spatial intersection of highly valued resources and assets (HVRAs) with pixel-based burn probability estimates enables quantification of HVRA exposure to wildfire in terms of expected area burned. However, statistical expectations can mask variability in HVRA area burned across all simulated fires. We present an alternative, polygon-based formulation for deriving estimates of HVRA area burned. This effort enhances investigations into spatial patterns of fire occurrence and behavior by overlaying simulated fire perimeters with mapped HVRA polygons to estimate conditional distributions of HVRA area burned. This information can be especially useful for assessing risks where cumulative effects and the spatial pattern and extent of area burned influence HVRA response to fire. We illustrate our modeling approach and demonstrate application across real-world landscapes for two case studies: first, a comparative analysis of exposure and area burned across ten municipal watersheds on the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest in Montana, USA, and second, fireshed delineation and exposure analysis of a geographically isolated and limited area of critical wildlife habitat on the Pike and San Isabel National Forests in Colorado, USA. We highlight how this information can be used to inform prioritization and mitigation decisions and can be used complementarily with more traditional pixel-based burn probability and fire intensity metrics in an expanded exposure analysis framework.

[1]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of wildfire hazard and municipal watershed exposure , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[2]  C. E. Van Wagner,et al.  Prediction of crown fire behavior in two stands of jack pine , 1993 .

[3]  Charles C. Rhoades,et al.  The influence of wildfire extent and severity on streamwater chemistry, sediment and temperature following the Hayman Fire, Colorado , 2011 .

[4]  Russell T. Graham,et al.  Hayman Fire Case Study , 2003 .

[5]  Marc Hanewinkel,et al.  Assessing natural hazards in forestry for risk management: a review , 2011, European Journal of Forest Research.

[6]  Joe H. Scott,et al.  Standard Fire Behavior Fuel Models: A Comprehensive Set for Use with Rothermel?s Surface Fire Spread Model , 2015 .

[7]  Alan A. Ager,et al.  Assessing exposure of human and ecological values to wildfire in Sardinia, Italy , 2013 .

[8]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Integrated wildfire risk assessment: Framework development and application on the Lewis and Clark National Forest in Montana, USA , 2013, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[9]  Carol Miller,et al.  Contributions of Ignitions, Fuels, and Weather to the Spatial Patterns of Burn Probability of a Boreal Landscape , 2011, Ecosystems.

[10]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Integrated national-scale assessment of wildfire risk to human and ecological values , 2011 .

[11]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Uncertainty and risk in wildland fire management: a review. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Modeling Containment of Large Wildfires Using Generalized Linear Mixed-Model Analysis , 2009, Forest Science.

[13]  Patricia L. Andrews,et al.  Fuels Management-How to Measure Success: Conference Proceedings , 2006 .

[14]  C. E. Van Wagner,et al.  Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire , 1977 .

[15]  Alan A. Ager,et al.  Evaluating spatially explicit burn probabilities for strategic fire management planning , 2008 .

[16]  Klaus H. Barber,et al.  Stewardship and fireshed assessment: a process for designing a landscape fuel treatment strategy. , 2007 .

[17]  M. Parisien,et al.  Considerations for modeling burn probability across landscapes with steep environmental gradients: an example from the Columbia Mountains, Canada , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[18]  Jack D. Cohen,et al.  The national fire-danger rating system: basic equations , 1985 .

[19]  M. Finney,et al.  Using ArcObjects for Automating Fireshed Assessments and Analyzing Wildfire Risk , 2006 .

[20]  Alexandra D. Syphard,et al.  Effects of ignition location models on the burn patterns of simulated wildfires , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[21]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group 10-2011 A simulation of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the continental United States , 2017 .

[22]  Joe H. Scott,et al.  Quantifying the Threat of Unsuppressed Wildfires Reaching the Adjacent Wildland-Urban Interface on the Bridger-Teton National Forest, Wyoming, USA , 2012 .

[23]  M. Finney Fire growth using minimum travel time methods , 2002 .

[24]  M. Bergtold,et al.  Biomass or growth rate endpoint for algae and aquatic plants: Relevance for the aquatic risk assessment of herbicides , 2011, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[25]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  A real-time risk assessment tool supporting wildland fire decisionmaking , 2011 .

[26]  M. Finney An Overview of FlamMap Fire Modeling Capabilities , 2006 .

[27]  H. Preisler,et al.  Analyzing wildfire exposure and source–sink relationships on a fire prone forest landscape , 2012 .

[28]  Yohay Carmel,et al.  Assessing fire risk using Monte Carlo simulations of fire spread , 2009 .

[29]  M. Finney,et al.  Wildfire Exposure Analysis on the National Forests in the Pacific Northwest, USA , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[30]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Challenges and Approaches in Planning Fuel Treatments across Fire-Excluded Forested Landscapes , 2010, Journal of Forestry.

[31]  Joe H. Scott,et al.  Assessing Crown Fire Potential by Linking Models of Surface and Crown Fire Behavior , 2003 .

[32]  Volker C. Radeloff,et al.  Wildfire risk in the wildland―urban interface: A simulation study in northwestern Wisconsin , 2009 .

[33]  Carol Miller,et al.  Spatial bottom-up controls on fire likelihood vary across western North America , 2012 .

[34]  Alan A. Ager,et al.  A review of recent advances in risk analysis for wildfire management , 2013 .

[35]  Mark A. Finney,et al.  The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire , 2005 .