[Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].

The use of acellular dermal matrices and synthetic meshes is gaining popularity in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction, allowing the complete coverage of the prosthesis with greater pocket control and improved cosmesis. In this concise review, we present the advantages of acellular dermal matrices and resorbable or nonresorbable synthetic meshes in implant-based breast reconstruction, we discuss the risk of postoperative complications, and we raise their contribution in the growing interest of prepectoral breast reconstruction.

[1]  L. Angelini,et al.  Use of mesh to repair the submuscolar pocket in breast reconstruction: a new possible technique. , 1998, Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery.

[2]  Horacio F. Mayer,et al.  Immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction: the ensured subpectoral pocket (ESP). , 2007, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[3]  K. Lee,et al.  Updated Evidence of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[4]  J. Lind,et al.  The Use of Synthetic Mesh in Reconstructive, Revision, and Cosmetic Breast Surgery , 2013, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[5]  F. Boriani,et al.  Aesthetic role of the surgically rebuilt inframammary fold for implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy. , 2007, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[6]  A. Colwell,et al.  Retrospective Review of 331 Consecutive Immediate Single-Stage Implant Reconstructions with Acellular Dermal Matrix: Indications, Complications, Trends, and Costs , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  J. Blohmer,et al.  Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP Bra): A Multicenter Study of 231 Cases , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  Seth Tebockhorst,et al.  Current Trends in Breast Reconstruction: Survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010 , 2013, Annals of plastic surgery.

[9]  J. Lind,et al.  Immediate Implant-based Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Using a Vertical Incision , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[10]  M. Hanasono,et al.  Implant Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Radiation Therapy , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  A. Fausto,et al.  Subcutaneous Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Surgical, Functional, and Aesthetic Results after Long-Term Follow-Up , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[12]  R. Downs,et al.  An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction—A Case Series , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[13]  G. Ferrante,et al.  The Use of TIGR Matrix in Breast Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery: Is a Resorbable Synthetic Mesh a Viable Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices? , 2018, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[14]  R. Simmons,et al.  Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: a critical analysis of local recurrence. , 2000, Cancer journal.

[15]  S. Warren,et al.  Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction With Implants and Inferolateral AlloDerm Slings , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[16]  H. Lippert,et al.  Influence of Titanium Coating on the Biocompatibility of a Heavyweight Polypropylene Mesh , 2004, European Surgical Research.

[17]  M. Gadd,et al.  Avoiding Breast Animation Deformity with Pectoralis-Sparing Subcutaneous Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[18]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  Use of the serratus anterior fascia flap for expander coverage in breast reconstruction. , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  B. Toth,et al.  Modified Skin Incisions for Mastectomy: The Need for Plastic Surgical Input in Preoperative Planning , 1991, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  R. Simmons,et al.  Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: Can the areola be preserved? , 2002, Annals of surgical oncology.

[21]  B. Sarfati,et al.  Inframammary fold reconstruction: the "hammock" technique. , 2015, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[22]  P. Parikh,et al.  Acellular Dermis-Assisted Breast Reconstruction , 2008, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[23]  M. Hicks,et al.  Further evidence that human acellular dermal matrix decreases inflammatory markers of capsule formation in implant-based breast reconstruction. , 2015, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[24]  K. Junge,et al.  Capsular contracture in implant based breast reconstruction-the effect of porcine acellular dermal matrix. , 2017, Gland surgery.

[25]  R. Simmons,et al.  Areola-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction , 2003, Annals of plastic surgery.

[26]  S. Jacobson,et al.  Revisiting an Old Place: Single‐Surgeon Experience on Post‐Mastectomy Subcutaneous Implant‐Based Breast Reconstruction , 2017, The breast journal.

[27]  E. Cigna,et al.  Skin-Reduction Breast Reconstructions with Prepectoral Implant , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[28]  W. Wood,et al.  Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations. , 1997, Annals of surgery.

[29]  S. Bianchi,et al.  Subcutaneous Tissue Expander Placement with Synthetic Titanium-Coated Mesh in Breast Reconstruction: Long-term Results , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[30]  R. Bosc,et al.  Impact of adjuvant anti-estrogen therapies (tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors) on perioperative outcomes of breast reconstruction. , 2017, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[31]  F. Peintinger,et al.  Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. , 2015, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[32]  E. Hansson,et al.  Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery.

[33]  T. Reimer,et al.  Using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra) for implant-based breast reconstruction: case report and histological analysis , 2012, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[34]  F. Kolb,et al.  Utilisation du vert d’indocyanine en chirurgie sénologique et reconstruction mammaire , 2017 .

[35]  P. Quattrone,et al.  Focus on the Breast Fascial System: A New Approach for Inframammary Fold Reconstruction , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[36]  H. Langstein,et al.  Acellular Dermis–Assisted Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction versus Complete Submuscular Coverage: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Outcomes , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[37]  L. Lostumbo,et al.  Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. , 2010, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

[38]  G. Santori,et al.  Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Polyester Mesh (Surgimesh-PET): A Retrospective Single-Center Study , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[39]  S. Cawthorn,et al.  Subcutaneous implant breast reconstruction: Time to reconsider? , 2017, European Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[40]  M Dieterich,et al.  Biological Matrices and Synthetic Meshes Used in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction - a Review of Products Available in Germany. , 2013, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[41]  M. Scheflan,et al.  Tissue Reinforcement in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[42]  G. Clermont,et al.  Three-year results from a preclinical implantation study of a long-term resorbable surgical mesh with time-dependent mechanical characteristics , 2011, Hernia.

[43]  Á. Atallah,et al.  Nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[44]  M. Alperovich,et al.  “Breast in a Day”: Examining Single-Stage Immediate, Permanent Implant Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[45]  Chrisovalantis X Lakhiani,et al.  Treatment of Capsular Contracture Using Complete Implant Coverage by Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Novel Technique , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[46]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  The pedicled subpectoral fascia flap for expander coverage in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a novel technique. , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[47]  E. Wang,et al.  Human Acellular Dermis versus Submuscular Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Multivariate Analysis of Short-Term Complications , 2013, Archives of plastic surgery.

[48]  R. Israeli Complications of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast Surgery , 2012, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[49]  R. Kolter,et al.  High-Throughput Assay for Bacterial Adhesion on Acellular Dermal Matrices and Synthetic Surgical Materials , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[50]  T. Perneger,et al.  Risks and Benefits of Using an Absorbable Mesh in One-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[51]  S. Cawthorn,et al.  Evaluation of a novel breast reconstruction technique using the Braxon® acellular dermal matrix: a new muscle‐sparing breast reconstruction , 2017, ANZ journal of surgery.

[52]  J. Lipa,et al.  Comparison of Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[53]  M. Meek,et al.  Nonexpansive Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Human Acellular Tissue Matrix Graft (AlloDerm) , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[54]  R. Banfi,et al.  TiLoop® Bra mesh used for immediate breast reconstruction: comparison of retropectoral and subcutaneous implant placement in a prospective single-institution series , 2014, European Journal of Plastic Surgery.

[55]  J. Farhadi,et al.  Immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: factors affecting outcome. , 2014, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[56]  G. Robb,et al.  Delayed-Immediate Breast Reconstruction , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[57]  S. Cawthorn,et al.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of the prepectoral breast reconstruction with Braxon dermal matrix: First multicenter European report on 100 cases , 2017, The breast journal.

[58]  A. Gabriel,et al.  Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Rationale, Indications, and Preliminary Results , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[59]  Jad M. Abdelsattar,et al.  Comparison of subcutaneous versus submuscular expander placement in the first stage of immediate breast reconstruction. , 2016, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[60]  M. Hicks,et al.  Acellular Cadaveric Dermis Decreases the Inflammatory Response in Capsule Formation in Reconstructive Breast Surgery , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[61]  Kerri A. Rossmeier,et al.  Complication Rates With Human Acellular Dermal Matrices: Retrospective Review of 211 Consecutive Breast Reconstructions , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[62]  A. Ashikari,et al.  Acellular Dermal Matrix–Assisted Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction and Capsular Contracture: A 13-Year Experience , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[63]  E. Vandeweyer,et al.  Radiation Therapy after Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Implants , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[64]  Donald S. Mowlds,et al.  Staged Suprapectoral Expander/Implant Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[65]  A. Colwell,et al.  Inferolateral AlloDerm Hammock for Implant Coverage in Breast Reconstruction , 2007, Annals of plastic surgery.

[66]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Beyond Biologics: Absorbable Mesh as a Low-Cost, Low-Complication Sling for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.