Study plans, a pre-tested questionnaire, a sample design evaluation tool, a community publicity monitoring plan, and a theoretical framework have been developed to support combined social/acoustical surveys of residents' reactions to an abrupt change in environmental noise, Secondary analyses of more than 20 previous surveys provide estimates of three parameters of a study simulation model; within individual variability, between study wave variability, and between neighborhood variability in response to community noise. The simulation model predicts the precision of the results from social surveys of reactions to noise, including changes in noise. When the study simulation model analyzed the population distribution, noise exposure environments and feasible noise measurement program at a proposed noise change survey site, it was concluded that the site could not yield sufficient precise estimates of human reaction model to justify conducting a survey. Additional secondary analyses determined that noise reactions are affected by the season of the social survey.
[1]
H. Vos,et al.
Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise
,
1999
.
[2]
J. M. Fields,et al.
A community survey of helicopter noise annoyance conducted under controlled noise exposure conditions
,
1985
.
[3]
J. M. Fields,et al.
THE RESPONSE TO RAILWAY NOISE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN GREAT BRITAIN
,
1982
.
[4]
W K Connor,et al.
COMMUNITY REACTION TO AIRCRAFT NOISE AROUND SMALLER CITY AIRPORTS
,
1972
.
[5]
J. Fields.
Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas
,
1993
.
[6]
F. J. Langdon,et al.
Subjective effects of traffic noise exposure: reliability and seasonal effects
,
1980
.
[7]
Karl S. Pearsons,et al.
Community sensitivity to changes in aircraft noise exposure
,
1981
.
[8]
G. J. Raw,et al.
Adaptation to changes in traffic noise exposure
,
1989
.